Literature DB >> 30703938

Efficacy of Fungicide Applications During and After Anthesis Against Fusarium Head Blight and Deoxynivalenol in Soft Red Winter Wheat.

D L D'Angelo1, C A Bradley2, K A Ames2, K T Willyerd1, L V Madden1, P A Paul1.   

Abstract

Seven field experiments were conducted in Ohio and Illinois between 2011 and 2013 to evaluate postanthesis applications of prothioconazole + tebuconazole and metconazole for Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol (DON) control in soft red winter wheat. Treatments consisted of an untreated check and fungicide applications made at early anthesis (A), 2 (A+2), 4 (A+4), 5 (A+5), or 6 (A+6) days after anthesis. Six of the seven experiments were augmented with artificial Fusarium graminearum inoculum, and the other was naturally infected. FHB index (IND), Fusarium damaged kernels (FDK), and DON concentration of grain were quantified. All application timings led to significantly lower mean arcsine-square-root-transformed IND and FDK (arcIND and arcFDK) and log-transformed (logDON) than in the untreated check; however, arcIND, arcFDK, and logDON for the postanthesis applications were generally not significantly different from those for the anthesis applications. Relative to the check, A+2 resulted in the highest percent control for both IND and DON, 69 and 54%, respectively, followed by A+4 (62 and 52%), A+6 (62 and 48%), and A (56 and 50%). A+2 and A+6 significantly reduced IND by 30 and 14%, respectively, relative to the anthesis application. Postanthesis applications did not, however, reduce DON relative to the anthesis application. These results suggest that applications made up to 6 days following anthesis may be just as effective as, and sometimes more effective than, anthesis applications at reducing FHB and DON.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 30703938     DOI: 10.1094/PDIS-01-14-0091-RE

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Dis        ISSN: 0191-2917            Impact factor:   4.438


  6 in total

Review 1.  Fungicide Resistance in Fusarium graminearum Species Complex.

Authors:  Magda Antunes de Chaves; Paula Reginatto; Bárbara Souza da Costa; Ricardo Itiki de Paschoal; Mário Lettieri Teixeira; Alexandre Meneghello Fuentefria
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid Disodium Salt Acts as an Antifungal Candidate Molecule against Fusariumzzm321990 graminearum by Inhibiting DON Biosynthesis and Chitin Synthase Activity.

Authors:  Xiu-Shi Song; Kai-Xin Gu; Jing Gao; Jian-Xin Wang; Shao-Chen Ding; Mingguo Zhou
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-27       Impact factor: 4.546

3.  Compatible interaction of Brachypodium distachyon and endophytic fungus Microdochium bolleyi.

Authors:  Pavel Matušinsky; Božena Sedláková; Dominik Bleša
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Modelling the Effects of Weather Conditions on Cereal Grain Contamination with Deoxynivalenol in the Baltic Sea Region.

Authors:  Katarzyna Marzec-Schmidt; Thomas Börjesson; Skaidre Suproniene; Małgorzata Jędryczka; Sigita Janavičienė; Tomasz Góral; Ida Karlsson; Yuliia Kochiieru; Piotr Ochodzki; Audronė Mankevičienė; Kristin Piikki
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 4.546

5.  Lactic Acid Bacteria as Potential Biocontrol Agents for Fusarium Head Blight Disease of Spring Barley.

Authors:  Micheal B Byrne; Ganesh Thapa; FIona M Doohan; James I Burke
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 6.064

6.  Transcriptional analysis of wheat seedlings inoculated with Fusarium culmorum under continual exposure to disease defence inductors.

Authors:  Zuzana Antalová; Dominik Bleša; Petr Martinek; Pavel Matušinsky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.