Fatma Güntürkün1, Oguz Akbilgic2, Robert L Davis1, Gregory T Armstrong3, Rebecca M Howell4, John L Jefferies5, Kirsten K Ness3, Ibrahim Karabayir2,6, John T Lucas7, Deo Kumar Srivastava8, Melissa M Hudson3,5,9, Leslie L Robison3, Elsayed Z Soliman10, Daniel A Mulrooney3,5,9. 1. Center for Biomedical Informatics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN. 2. Department of Health Informatics and Data Science, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 4. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. The Cardiovascular Institute, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN. 6. Kirklareli University, Kirklareli, Turkey. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 8. Department of Biostatistics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 9. Department of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN. 10. Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Early identification of childhood cancer survivors at high risk for treatment-related cardiomyopathy may improve outcomes by enabling intervention before development of heart failure. We implemented artificial intelligence (AI) methods using the Children's Oncology Group guideline-recommended baseline ECG to predict cardiomyopathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven AI and signal processing methods were applied to 10-second 12-lead ECGs obtained on 1,217 adult survivors of childhood cancer prospectively followed in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) study. Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function was performed at initial and follow-up SJLIFE visits. Cardiomyopathy was defined as an ejection fraction < 50% or an absolute drop from baseline ≥ 10%. Genetic algorithm was used for feature selection, and extreme gradient boosting was applied to predict cardiomyopathy during the follow-up period. Model performance was evaluated by five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The median age at baseline SJLIFE evaluation was 31.7 years (range 18.4-66.4), and the time between baseline and follow-up evaluations was 5.2 years (0.5-9.5). Two thirds (67.1%) of patients were exposed to chest radiation, and 76.6% to anthracycline chemotherapy. One hundred seventeen (9.6%) patients developed cardiomyopathy during follow-up. In the model based solely on ECG features, the cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.90), whereas the model based on clinical features had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.74). In the model based on ECG and clinical features, the cross-validation AUC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.91), with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 81%. CONCLUSION: AI using ECG data may assist in the identification of childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for developing future cardiomyopathy.
PURPOSE: Early identification of childhood cancer survivors at high risk for treatment-related cardiomyopathy may improve outcomes by enabling intervention before development of heart failure. We implemented artificial intelligence (AI) methods using the Children's Oncology Group guideline-recommended baseline ECG to predict cardiomyopathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven AI and signal processing methods were applied to 10-second 12-lead ECGs obtained on 1,217 adult survivors of childhood cancer prospectively followed in the St Jude Lifetime Cohort (SJLIFE) study. Clinical and echocardiographic assessment of cardiac function was performed at initial and follow-up SJLIFE visits. Cardiomyopathy was defined as an ejection fraction < 50% or an absolute drop from baseline ≥ 10%. Genetic algorithm was used for feature selection, and extreme gradient boosting was applied to predict cardiomyopathy during the follow-up period. Model performance was evaluated by five-fold stratified cross-validation. RESULTS: The median age at baseline SJLIFE evaluation was 31.7 years (range 18.4-66.4), and the time between baseline and follow-up evaluations was 5.2 years (0.5-9.5). Two thirds (67.1%) of patients were exposed to chest radiation, and 76.6% to anthracycline chemotherapy. One hundred seventeen (9.6%) patients developed cardiomyopathy during follow-up. In the model based solely on ECG features, the cross-validation area under the curve (AUC) was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83 to 0.90), whereas the model based on clinical features had an AUC of 0.69 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.74). In the model based on ECG and clinical features, the cross-validation AUC was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.86 to 0.91), with a sensitivity of 78% and a specificity of 81%. CONCLUSION: AI using ECG data may assist in the identification of childhood cancer survivors at increased risk for developing future cardiomyopathy.
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Kirsten K Ness; Vikki G Nolan; Gregory T Armstrong; Daniel M Green; E Brannon Morris; Sheri L Spunt; Monika L Metzger; Kevin R Krull; James L Klosky; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Leslie L Robison Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Saro H Armenian; Melissa M Hudson; Renee L Mulder; Ming Hui Chen; Louis S Constine; Mary Dwyer; Paul C Nathan; Wim J E Tissing; Sadhna Shankar; Elske Sieswerda; Rod Skinner; Julia Steinberger; Elvira C van Dalen; Helena van der Pal; W Hamish Wallace; Gill Levitt; Leontien C M Kremer Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Melissa M Hudson; Matthew J Ehrhardt; Nickhill Bhakta; Malek Baassiri; Hesham Eissa; Wassim Chemaitilly; Daniel M Green; Daniel A Mulrooney; Gregory T Armstrong; Tara M Brinkman; James L Klosky; Kevin R Krull; Noah D Sabin; Carmen L Wilson; I-Chan Huang; Johnnie K Bass; Karen Hale; Sue Kaste; Raja B Khan; Deo Kumar Srivastava; Yutaka Yasui; Vijaya M Joshi; Saumini Srinivasan; Dennis Stokes; Mary Ellen Hoehn; Matthew Wilson; Kirsten K Ness; Leslie L Robison Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-12-29 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Eric J Chow; Yan Chen; Melissa M Hudson; Elizabeth A M Feijen; Leontien C Kremer; William L Border; Daniel M Green; Lillian R Meacham; Daniel A Mulrooney; Kirsten K Ness; Kevin C Oeffinger; Cécile M Ronckers; Charles A Sklar; Marilyn Stovall; Helena J van der Pal; Irma W E M van Dijk; Flora E van Leeuwen; Rita E Weathers; Leslie L Robison; Gregory T Armstrong; Yutaka Yasui Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2017-11-02 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Zachi I Attia; Peter A Noseworthy; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Samuel J Asirvatham; Abhishek J Deshmukh; Bernard J Gersh; Rickey E Carter; Xiaoxi Yao; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Brad J Erickson; Suraj Kapa; Paul A Friedman Journal: Lancet Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Zachi I Attia; Suraj Kapa; Francisco Lopez-Jimenez; Paul M McKie; Dorothy J Ladewig; Gaurav Satam; Patricia A Pellikka; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Peter A Noseworthy; Thomas M Munger; Samuel J Asirvatham; Christopher G Scott; Rickey E Carter; Paul A Friedman Journal: Nat Med Date: 2019-01-07 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Daniel Sierra-Lara Martinez; Peter A Noseworthy; Oguz Akbilgic; Joerg Herrmann; Kathryn J Ruddy; Abdulaziz Hamid; Ragasnehith Maddula; Ashima Singh; Robert Davis; Fatma Gunturkun; John L Jefferies; Sherry-Ann Brown Journal: Am Heart J Plus Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Oguz Akbilgic; Liam Butler; Ibrahim Karabayir; Patricia P Chang; Dalane W Kitzman; Alvaro Alonso; Lin Y Chen; Elsayed Z Soliman Journal: Eur Heart J Digit Health Date: 2021-10-09