Literature DB >> 30702199

Estimating landslides vulnerability in Rwanda using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system.

Lamek Nahayo1,2,3,4,5, Felix Ndayisaba4,5,6, Fidele Karamage4,5,7, Jean Baptiste Nsengiyumva1,5, Egide Kalisa8, Richard Mind'je1,2,3,4,5, Christophe Mupenzi5, Lanhai Li1,2,3.   

Abstract

Landslides are among hazards that undermine the social, economic, and environmental well-being of the vulnerable community. Assessment of landslides vulnerability reveals the damages that could be recorded, estimates the severity of the impact, and increases the preparedness, response, recovery, and mitigation as well. This study aims to estimate landslides vulnerability for the western province of Rwanda. Field survey and secondary data sources identified 96 landslides used to prepare a landslides inventory map. Ten factors-altitude, slope angles, normalized difference vegetation index (NVDI), land use, distance to roads, soil texture, rainfall, lithology, population density, and possession rate of communication tools-were analyzed. The Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) model was used to weight and rank the vulnerability conditioning factors. Then the Weighted Linear Combination (WLC) in geographic information system (GIS) spatially estimated landslides vulnerability over the study area. The results indicated the altitude (19.7%), slope angles (16.1%), soil texture (14.3%), lithology (13.5%), and rainfall (12.2%) as the major vulnerability conditioning parameters. The produced landslides vulnerability map is divided into 5 classes: very low, low, moderate, high and very high. The proposed method is validated by using the relative landslides density index (R-index) method, which revealed that 35.4%, 25%, and 23.9% of past landslides are observed within moderate, high, and very high vulnerability zones, respectively. The consistency of validation indicates good performance of the methodology used and the vulnerability map prepared. The results can be used by policy makers to recognize hazard vulnerability lessening and future planning needs. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;00:000-000.
© 2019 SETAC. © 2019 SETAC.

Keywords:  Analytical hierarchy process; GIS; Landslides; Vulnerability; Western Rwanda

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30702199     DOI: 10.1002/ieam.4132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag        ISSN: 1551-3777            Impact factor:   2.992


  2 in total

1.  Improving intelligent dasymetric mapping population density estimates at 30 m resolution for the conterminous United States by excluding uninhabited areas.

Authors:  Jeremy Baynes; Anne Neale; Torrin Hultgren
Journal:  Earth Syst Sci Data       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 11.815

2.  Safety Assessment of Casting Workshop by Cloud Model and Cause and Effect-LOPA to Protect Employee Health.

Authors:  Qingwei Xu; Kaili Xu; Fang Zhou
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-04-08       Impact factor: 3.390

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.