Literature DB >> 36213148

Improving intelligent dasymetric mapping population density estimates at 30 m resolution for the conterminous United States by excluding uninhabited areas.

Jeremy Baynes1, Anne Neale1, Torrin Hultgren2.   

Abstract

Population change impacts almost every aspect of global change from land use, to greenhouse gas emissions, to biodiversity conservation, to the spread of disease. Data on spatial patterns of population density help us understand patterns and drivers of human settlement and can help us quantify the exposure we face to natural disasters, pollution, and infectious disease. Human populations are typically recorded by national or regional units that can vary in shape and size. Using these irregularly sized units and ancillary data related to population dynamics, we can produce high-resolution gridded estimates of population density through intelligent dasymetric mapping (IDM). The gridded population density provides a more detailed estimate of how the population is distributed within larger units. Furthermore, we can refine our estimates of population density by specifying uninhabited areas which have impacts on the analysis of population density such as our estimates of human exposure. In this study, we used various geospatial datasets to expand the existing specification of uninhabited areas within the United States (US) Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) EnviroAtlas Dasymetric Population Map for the conterminous United States (CONUS). When compared to the existing definition of uninhabited areas for the EnviroAtlas dasymetric population map, we found that IDM's population estimates for the US Census Bureau blocks improved across all states in the CONUS. We found that IDM performed better in states with larger urban areas than in states that are sparsely populated. We also updated the existing EnviroAtlas Intelligent Dasymetric Mapping toolbox and expanded its capabilities to accept uninhabited areas. The updated 30 m population density for the CONUS is available via the EPA's Environmental Dataset Gateway (Baynes et al., 2021, https://doi.org/10.23719/1522948) and the EPA's EnviroAtlas https://www.epa.gov/enviroatlas, last access: 15 June 2022; Pickard et al., 2015).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36213148      PMCID: PMC9534036          DOI: 10.5194/essd-14-2833-2022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Earth Syst Sci Data        ISSN: 1866-3508            Impact factor:   11.815


  22 in total

1.  Housing growth in and near United States protected areas limits their conservation value.

Authors:  Volker C Radeloff; Susan I Stewart; Todd J Hawbaker; Urs Gimmi; Anna M Pidgeon; Curtis H Flather; Roger B Hammer; David P Helmers
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Dasymetric Modeling and Uncertainty.

Authors:  Nicholas N Nagle; Barbara P Buttenfield; Stefan Leyk; Seth Speilman
Journal:  Ann Assoc Am Geogr       Date:  2014-01-01

3.  Thematic accuracy assessment of the 2011 National Land Cover Database (NLCD).

Authors:  James Wickham; Stephen V Stehman; Leila Gass; Jon A Dewitz; Daniel G Sorenson; Brian J Granneman; Richard V Poss; Lori A Baer
Journal:  Remote Sens Environ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 10.164

4.  Improved population mapping for China using remotely sensed and points-of-interest data within a random forests model.

Authors:  Tingting Ye; Naizhuo Zhao; Xuchao Yang; Zutao Ouyang; Xiaoping Liu; Qian Chen; Kejia Hu; Wenze Yue; Jiaguo Qi; Zhansheng Li; Peng Jia
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 7.963

5.  Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation.

Authors:  Oscar Venter; Eric W Sanderson; Ainhoa Magrach; James R Allan; Jutta Beher; Kendall R Jones; Hugh P Possingham; William F Laurance; Peter Wood; Balázs M Fekete; Marc A Levy; James E M Watson
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Census-independent population mapping in northern Nigeria.

Authors:  Eric M Weber; Vincent Y Seaman; Robert N Stewart; Tomas J Bird; Andrew J Tatem; Jacob J McKee; Budhendra L Bhaduri; Jessica J Moehl; Andrew E Reith
Journal:  Remote Sens Environ       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 10.164

7.  High-resolution reconstruction of the United States human population distribution, 1790 to 2010.

Authors:  Yu Fang; James W Jawitz
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 6.444

8.  New estimates of flood exposure in developing countries using high-resolution population data.

Authors:  Andrew Smith; Paul D Bates; Oliver Wing; Christopher Sampson; Niall Quinn; Jeff Neal
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-04-18       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Development and applications of a comprehensive land use classification and map for the US.

Authors:  David M Theobald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The evolution of human population distance to water in the USA from 1790 to 2010.

Authors:  Yu Fang; James W Jawitz
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.