Halide perovskites passivated with potassium or rubidium show superior photovoltaic device performance compared to unpassivated samples. However, it is unclear which passivation route is more effective for film stability. Here, we directly compare the optoelectronic properties and stability of thin films when passivating triple-cation perovskite films with potassium or rubidium species. The optoelectronic and chemical studies reveal that the alloyed perovskites are tolerant toward higher loadings of potassium than rubidium. Whereas potassium complexes with bromide from the perovskite precursor solution to form thin surface passivation layers, rubidium additives favor the formation of phase-segregated micron-sized rubidium halide crystals. This tolerance to higher loadings of potassium allows us to achieve superior luminescent properties with potassium passivation. We also find that exposure to a humid atmosphere drives phase segregation and grain coalescence for all compositions, with the rubidium-passivated sample showing the highest sensitivity to nonperovskite phase formation. Our work highlights the benefits but also the limitations of these passivation approaches in maximizing both optoelectronic properties and the stability of perovskite films.
Halide perovskites passivated with potassium or rubidium show superior photovoltaic device performance compared to unpassivated samples. However, it is unclear which passivation route is more effective for film stability. Here, we directly compare the optoelectronic properties and stability of thin films when passivating triple-cation perovskite films with potassium or rubidium species. The optoelectronic and chemical studies reveal that the alloyed perovskites are tolerant toward higher loadings of potassium than rubidium. Whereas potassium complexes with bromide from the perovskite precursor solution to form thin surface passivation layers, rubidium additives favor the formation of phase-segregated micron-sized rubidium halide crystals. This tolerance to higher loadings of potassium allows us to achieve superior luminescent properties with potassium passivation. We also find that exposure to a humid atmosphere drives phase segregation and grain coalescence for all compositions, with the rubidium-passivated sample showing the highest sensitivity to nonperovskite phase formation. Our work highlights the benefits but also the limitations of these passivation approaches in maximizing both optoelectronic properties and the stability of perovskite films.
Metal halide perovskite solar
cells have recently emerged as one of the most promising candidates
for low-cost thin-film photovoltaics (PVs),[1] having now reached power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) close to
23%,[2] making them comparable to commercialized
thin-film counterparts.[3] The favorable
intrinsic properties of these materials, including a strong absorption
coefficient,[4] sharp band edges with low
levels of disorder,[5] photon recycling capability,[6,7] and excellent charge transport characteristics,[8] render them excellent candidates for related optoelectronic
applications such as solar cells,[2] light-emitting
diodes,[9] and transistors.[10] The general formula for this class of materials is ABX3, consisting of at least one monovalent cation at the A-sites,
(e.g., cesium, Cs; methylammonium (MA), CH3NH3; formamidinium (FA), CH3(NH2)2);
a divalentmetal at the B-sites (e.g., Pb, Sn); and a halide at the
X-sites (e.g., Cl, Br, I, or mixtures thereof). There has been intensive
research on the addition of monovalent cations and halides into the
perovskite precursor solutions to enhance the crystallinity,[11] phase stability,[12] and optoelectronic properties of the perovskite materials.[13,14] In particular, an alloyed perovskite such as (Cs0.06MA0.15FA0.79)Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3 (triple cation or TC) shows superior PV performance and moisture
stability compared to a single-cation composition such as MAPbI3 and as a result has become one of the state-of-the-art perovskite
compositions.[15−18] Recently, the addition of rubidium (Rb) halide into the TC perovskite
has led to further enhanced performance and stability of perovskite
solar cells, with an optimal loading for performance at 5% Rb with
respect to the other A-site cations.[19,20] Furthermore,
we and others have recently shown that passivation of TC films with
potassium (K) halides can also significantly enhance the optoelectronic
properties of perovskite device structures, with photoluminescence
quantum efficiencies of ∼15% in complete solar cell stacks
and the inhibition of photoinduced ion migration processes across
a wide range of perovskite bandgaps.[21−24] We found that the optimal loading
of K for achieving both high luminescence yield and excellent charge
carrier transport is 10% K relative to the A-site cation.[25] The precise location of the passivating ions
is still an open question in the community: recent evidence from the
literature and our own work suggests that neither K nor Rb are incorporated
within the perovskite lattice,[25,26] though there is also
evidence that these ions may occupy interstitial sites[24] at the surfaces.[25] Despite the apparent similarities between the passivation routes
of the TC films with Rb or K, a direct comparison between the two
in terms of tolerance to loading fractions, overall effectiveness,
and the viability of these approaches for stable perovskite thin films
has not yet been performed.Here, we directly compare the optoelectronic
properties and chemical
and structural stability of TC films passivated with Rb or K additives.
We find that the TC films can incorporate higher loadings of K than
Rb before undergoing large-scale phase segregation at larger loading
fractions, an observation that correlates with K-passivated films
with optimal loading levels exhibiting superior optoelectronic properties
(such as luminescence efficiency) over Rb-passivated films. We find
that both passivation routes lead to the formation of nonperovskite
phases; for K, these phases selectively decorate the GBs and interfaces
even up to high loadings (∼10%), while for Rb above ∼5%
loading, the majority of the Rb is locked into large micron-sized
nonperovskite crystallites. We track the structural, chemical, and
morphological changes of these perovskites over time under humid conditions.
We find superior moisture stability in ambient conditions for K-passivated
TC films compared to Rb-passivated films, though in both cases over
extended aging times and elevated humidity levels nonperovskite phases
form. Interestingly, we also observe a substantial grain coalescence
concomitant with further enhancement in the luminescence quantum yield
for the TC and K-passivated samples under humid conditions. Our work
reveals critical insight into the behavior and stability of passivation
treatments on perovskite compositions, revealing key benefits and
shortfalls of each approach.We spin-coated a series of perovskite
thin films on glass by diluting
the concentration of the A-site cations in the TC precursor solutions
with KI- and RbI-based solutions in different volume ratios (see the
Methods section in the Supporting Information (SI)).[19,25,27] We denote the resulting passivated samples as x = [K or Rb]/([K or Rb] + [A]), where A = (Cs, FA, MA) and x represents the fraction of K or Rb out of the A-site cations
in the precursor solution. In Figure a, we show the photoluminescence quantum efficiency
(PLQE) of the (Cs0.06MA0.15FA0.79)Pb(I0.85Br0.15)3 perovskite films
with increasing K and Rb content measured at excitation densities
equivalent to 1 sun solar illumination conditions. We observe a large
increase from the initial value of 18% for TC to 41% for K-passivated
TC (x = 0.05), which increases further to 52% for x = 0.20.[25] However, we do not
find an appreciable increase in the PLQE in the Rb-passivated samples
beyond x = 0.05. We find that the loadings of K or
Rb for peak solar cell device performance match those from luminescence,
with the open-circuit voltage Voc (Figure b) and short-circuit
current Jsc(Figure c) maximized at x = 0.05
for Rb-passivated TC devices but at x = 0.10 for
K-passivated TC devices (see Figure S1 and Table S1 for current–voltage (J–V) curves and device parameters,
respectively). The decrease at very high loadings is consistent with
an increasing concentration of nonperovskite precipitates.[18] These results show that we can achieve superior
optoelectronic properties through passivation with K than that with
Rb; the K route offers greater versatility because wider ranges of
loadings are possible before detrimental effects on performance parameters
are observed.
Figure 1
(a) PLQE of passivated perovskite thin films measured
under illumination
with a 532 nm laser at an excitation intensity equivalent to ∼1
sun (∼60 mW·cm–2). (b) Open-circuit
voltage (Voc) and (c) short-circuit current
(Jsc) extracted from current–voltage
characteristics of pristine and passivated TC perovskite devices measured
under full simulated solar illumination conditions (AM1.5, 100 mW·cm–2) (see Figure S1 for J–V curves).
(a) PLQE of passivated perovskite thin films measured
under illumination
with a 532 nm laser at an excitation intensity equivalent to ∼1
sun (∼60 mW·cm–2). (b) Open-circuit
voltage (Voc) and (c) short-circuit current
(Jsc) extracted from current–voltage
characteristics of pristine and passivated TC perovskite devices measured
under full simulated solar illumination conditions (AM1.5, 100 mW·cm–2) (see Figure S1 for J–V curves).To investigate the local chemical and morphological composition
of the passivated TC perovskite thin films, we performed scanning
transmission electron microscopy energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
(STEM-EDX) measurements. We prepared a lamella of the x = 0.10 sample for both K- and Rb-passivated TC perovskite films
with 2,2′,7,7′-tetrakis(N,N-di-p-methoxyphenyl-amine)9,9′-spirobifluorene (Spiro-OMeTAD)
and platinum capping layers to preserve the active layer during specimen
preparation (see Figure a,d and Figure S2 for STEM high-angle
annular dark field (HAADF) cross-sectional images). We used experimental
parameters similar to those in our previous reports for different
perovskite compositions in which we optimized the beam conditions
to minimize any potential beam-induced damage or phase segregation.[28] We used a Non-negative Matrix Factorization
(NMF) algorithm[29] to decompose different
phases in the cross-sectional STEM-EDX of the thin films. This analysis
reveals the presence of two different compositional phases in both
K- and Rb-passivated TC samples, namely, a perovskite phase (identified
from Br Lα, Pb Mα, and I Lα lines) and an additive-rich phase (Figure b,c,e,f; see Figures S3 and S4 for complete NMF decomposition results and Figures S5 and S6 for perovskite phases). In
the K-passivated TC, we found that most of the K-(additive)-rich phase
is composed of K and Br and situated at the grain boundaries (GBs)
and interfaces of the perovskite film (Figure b), as we observed previously at higher loadings.[25] However, in the Rb-passivated TC at the same
loading as the K sample, we observed that the majority of the Rb is
contained in large, micron-sized crystals rich in Rb and I (Figure d–f) with
no evidence for the presence of Rb selectively moving to the surfaces
of the film within our experimental resolution (estimated to be ∼1
atom %). Complementary photoelectron spectroscopy (PES) measurements
on the samples reveal that Rb is more uniformly distributed throughout
the film, with a negligible change when probing the surface (XPS)
and probing deeper into the bulk (via the use of hard X-rays, HAXPES);
on the other hand, the K content is higher on the surface than that
in the bulk (Figures g,h and S7). We note that we also did
not observe any significant changes in binding energy within experimental
resolution of the lead (Pb 4f) or halide (I 3d and Br 3d) core levels,
consistent with these additives not incorporating into the perovskite
lattice[21,30] (Figure S8). These results highlight an important finding: in the K-passivated
samples, the K (even when added as KI) complexes selectively with
the Br present in the TC precursor solution with an almost 1:1 atomic
percent ratio, while the Rb interacts primarily with iodide with an
atomic percent ratio of 1:2, with only smaller fractions of Br (I:Br
≈ 8; see Table S2 for atomic percent
analyses from the STEM-EDX analyses). These results are consistent
with a larger red shift of the PL peaks for K than that for Rb at
the same loading of each due to a lower fraction of Br incorporated
into the final perovskite lattice for K than that for Rb (Figure S9). These differences are also consistent
with the lower formation energies of bonds comprising KBr and RbI
relative to KI and RbBr, respectively.[31,32]
Figure 2
(a) HAADF STEM
cross-sectional image of a TC perovskite thin film
passivated with K (x = 0.10). (b) NMF decomposition
of the K-passivated TC sample showing the KBr phase and (c) the corresponding
EDX spectra (see Figure S5 for the perovskite
phase). (d) HAADF STEM cross-sectional image of a TC perovskite thin
film passivated with Rb (x = 0.10). (e) NMF decomposition
of the Rb-passivated TC sample showing the Rb–I–Br phase
and (f) the corresponding EDX spectra (see Figures S5 and S6 for the perovskite phase). Intensity ratios between
different core levels of the (g) K and (h) Rb additives with respect
to the lead with different probe beam energies from XPS (1486.6 eV)
and HAXPES (4000 eV) measurements. We used Pb 4f, K 2p, Cs 4d, and
Rb 3d core levels for all beam energies (see Figures S7 and S8 for full spectra).
(a) HAADF STEM
cross-sectional image of a TC perovskite thin film
passivated with K (x = 0.10). (b) NMF decomposition
of the K-passivated TC sample showing the KBr phase and (c) the corresponding
EDX spectra (see Figure S5 for the perovskite
phase). (d) HAADF STEM cross-sectional image of a TC perovskite thin
film passivated with Rb (x = 0.10). (e) NMF decomposition
of the Rb-passivated TC sample showing the Rb–I–Br phase
and (f) the corresponding EDX spectra (see Figures S5 and S6 for the perovskite phase). Intensity ratios between
different core levels of the (g) K and (h) Rb additives with respect
to the lead with different probe beam energies from XPS (1486.6 eV)
and HAXPES (4000 eV) measurements. We used Pb 4f, K 2p, Cs 4d, and
Rb 3d core levels for all beam energies (see Figures S7 and S8 for full spectra).In our previous work, we proposed that the K selectively
draws
the Br out from the lattice in the precursor solution. This allows
exploitation of the beneficial effects of Br in the seeding of high-quality
grain growth but then the removal of a fraction of the Br from the
lattice of the final film, which would otherwise negatively impact
optoelectronic properties.[33] By contrast,
the Rb binds the iodide more strongly, but we do not see the same
effects. Furthermore, the inferior solubility of RbI compared to that
of KBr in the dimethylformamide (DMF)/dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) precursor
solution[31,32] means that Rb precipitates into large Rbhalide crystals at a lower loading than KBr, with the K-passivated
samples primarily showing GB and surface decoration with the KBr species.
These results provide an explanation for the superior optoelectronic
properties of the K passivation route over Rb passivation: the greater
solubility of the key nonperovskite phase in the former (KBr) compared
to the latter (Rb–I–Br-based phase) means that the system
is tolerant to a higher loading of beneficial passivating species
of K than Rb, and the specificity of K for Br also contributes to
the particularly large enhancements.We then compared the atmospheric
stability of the passivated films
in each case, with the passivated samples fixed herein at x = 0.05 to ensure reasonable optoelectronic properties
for both Rb and K. In Figure , we show top-view scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images
of perovskite thin films exposed to ambient air (30% relative humidity,
RH) for 1 week in dark conditions. We observe that the TC and K-passivated
TC films remain unchanged, while needle-like crystals, distributed
homogeneously across the sample area, form in the Rb-passivated TC
films. Recent work suggests that these crystals are Rb-rich and that
humidity accelerates their formation;[18] these crystals are likely to be similar species to those that we
observe distributed more sparsely in the films with higher Rb loadings
without humidity exposure (x = 0.10, Figure d–f). The formation
of crystallites in the Rb samples but not in the K (or TC) samples
can be attributed to the higher solubility of RbI at room temperature
in water (1.69 g/mL) compared to KBr (0.681 g/mL).[31,32]
Figure 3
SEM
top-view images at different magnifications of (a) TC, (b)
Rb-passivated TC, and (c) K-passivated TC films prepared on glass/FTO/TiO2, with the images acquired after storage of the films in ambient
laboratory air (30% RH) for 1 week in the dark.
SEM
top-view images at different magnifications of (a) TC, (b)
Rb-passivated TC, and (c) K-passivated TC films prepared on glass/FTO/TiO2, with the images acquired after storage of the films in ambient
laboratory air (30% RH) for 1 week in the dark.In order to further investigate the moisture stability and
the
local chemistry of the passivated TC perovskite thin films, we stored
the films under elevated humidity conditions (50% RH, N2) for a period of 24 h. In Figure , we show the morphology of the TC and Rb- and K-passivated
TC perovskite films before (Figure a–c) and after (Figure d–f) this humidity treatment. We observed
uniformly packed grains each of size ∼200–400 nm for
all of the unexposed perovskite films (Figure a–c). However, following humidity
exposure for 24 h, we observed the formation of material on the surfaces
of all films. We propose that the surface material for the TC specimen
corresponds primarily to PbI2 (cf. X-ray diffraction studies
below), which is particularly abundant at the GBs (Figure d,g). This is similar to degradation
in other polycrystalline materials where GBs are centers for degradation,
often called intergranular degradation.[34] We also found sparsely spaced long needle-like crystals (≥30
μm) that, based on SEM-EDX analyses (Figures S10 and S11), are rich in Cs. Furthermore, we again observed
the formation of Rb-rich crystals in Rb-passivated TCs, which appear
to be primarily rich in I but also smaller fractions of Br (Figure e, h). Finally, we
also observed the formation of KBr-rich surface crystallites in the
K-passivated TC films after the humidity treatment, which have similar
composition as those in our cross-sectional STEM-EDX decomposition
profile but are of larger size and distributed across the surface.
These results suggest that moderate humidity exposure promotes the
formation of nonperovskite material in each of the film compositions,
with the composition of the nonperovskite material being consistent
with that observed at elevated loadings of additives.
Figure 4
Top-view SEM images of
pristine (top row) and humidity-treated
(50% RH, N2 over a course of 24 h; second row) (a,d) TC,
(b,e) Rb-passivated TC, and (c,f) K-passivated TC perovskite thin
films. SEM-EDX elemental maps of the same (g) TC, (h) Rb-passivated
TC, and (i) K-passivated TC perovskite films.
Top-view SEM images of
pristine (top row) and humidity-treated
(50% RH, N2 over a course of 24 h; second row) (a,d) TC,
(b,e) Rb-passivated TC, and (c,f) K-passivated TC perovskite thin
films. SEM-EDX elemental maps of the same (g) TC, (h) Rb-passivated
TC, and (i) K-passivated TC perovskite films.Interestingly, we observe a significant coalescence of small
perovskite
grains into larger “fused” domains in the perovskite
thin films upon 50% RH treatment in the TC and K-passivated TC (Figure a,d and c,f). We
find that the average grain size increases remarkably from ∼200
nm to ∼2 μm in both samples (see Figure S12 for grain size distributions). Curiously, the perovskite
grains in Rb-passivated TCs preserve their original average grain
size distribution (Figure S12), though
we note that under more extreme humidity conditions (i.e., 75% RH),
we also see the coalescence in the Rb-passivated TCs (Figure S13). This suggests that the Rb-passivated
TC perovskite films are more resistant to grain reconstruction.In Table , we show
the PLQE of the perovskite thin films before and after storage in
a moderately humid environment (50% RH, N2). We observe
significant enhancement in the radiative efficiency of the perovskite
films for TC and K-passivated TC, with the PLQE increasing from 18.6
and 39.5%, respectively, to 27.9 and 49.2%, respectively. In contrast,
the PLQE of Rb-passivated TC drops from 22.8 to 12.9% after exposure.
We therefore find that the PLQE trend mirrors the grain fusing phenomena
as the radiative efficiency of the humidity-treated TC and K-passivated
sample with substantial grain coalescence increases substantially.
This observation is consistent with previous reports showing that
crystal (grain) coalescence is observed concomitant with enhanced
optoelectronic properties of MAPbI3 perovskite thin films
and the PV performance of the subsequent devices,[35,36] but to the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that this
has been observed in the alloyed perovskite structures. We note that
the positive impact on the PLQE of the grain coalescence in these
samples must outweigh any negative effects induced by the observed
crystallites on the surface (Figure g(i), which are in any case comprised of large bandgap
material that will not quench luminescence and may in fact also further
passivate (cf. PbI2).[37] We and
others have also previously reported enhancements in MAPbI3 device performance with controlled exposure to humidity but did
not observe grain coalescence in these cases.[38,39] We speculate that the drop in PLQE of the Rb-passivated TC films
can be attributed to degradation of the perovskite to nonperovskiteRb-rich phases but without any beneficial grain coalescence. This
is consistent with the reported drop in performance of the similarly
treated Rb-passivated TC-based perovskite solar cells.[18] We note that the surface crystallites in the
K and TC samples may still negatively influence interfacial charge
collection. Furthermore, it is likely that any residual moisture will
need to be removed, for example, through thermal annealing post-treatments,
to prevent long-term degradation issues for ultimate device utilization.
Thus, future work will be required to implement the samples with coalesced
grains into full, optimized devices.
Table 1
PLQE of
the Perovskite Thin Films
Measured before and after Storage in Humid Nitrogen (50% RH) for 24
ha
PLQE (%)
sample
before
after
TC
18.6
27.9
Rb-passivated TC
22.8
12.9
K-passivated
TC
39.5
49.6
Films
were illuminated with a
532 nm laser at an excitation intensity equivalent to 1 sun (∼60
mW·cm–2).
Films
were illuminated with a
532 nm laser at an excitation intensity equivalent to 1 sun (∼60
mW·cm–2).To further explore the structural stability of the perovskite thin
films and to track the growth of perovskite and nonperovskite crystals
upon humidity exposure, we performed XRD measurements on pristine
films that were aged in humid nitrogen (50% RH) over the course of
1 day (Figures and S14). For the TC film, we observed a PbI2 peak (2θ = 12.7°) that becomes narrower and more
intense with extended aging (Figure a), consistent with the formation of larger PbI2 crystallites at the perovskite surfaces and GBs (cf. Figure d). The humidity
exposure also leads to the emergence of new reflections with peaks
at 2θ = 10.0 and 11.2° that we assign to the yellow δ-phase
of Cs-rich (Cs,FA,MA)(I0.85Br0.15)3[40] and CsPb2I4Br,[18] respectively, in agreement with the segregation
of highly crystalline Cs-rich phases observed in the SEM-EDX analyses (Figures S10 and S11). For the pristine Rb-passivated perovskite (Figure b), we found a diffraction
peak at 2θ = 9.9° that we tentatively ascribe either to
the Rb-based perovskiteRbPb(I0.85Br0.15)3[18] or to the yellow δ-phase
of Cs-rich (Cs,FA,MA)(I0.85Br0.15)3[40] (as for the TC sample). During humidity
exposure, this feature remains stable, but after 24 h, we also see
the emergence of two new peaks at 2θ = 11.4 and 12.3° that
we attribute to a segregated RbPb2I4Br phase.[18] In Figure c, it is evident that similar PbI2 and CsPb2I4Br reflections are present in the XRD data for
the K-passivated TC sample albeit at much weaker intensities compared
to the TC films. The XRD pattern corresponding to the K-passivated
samples exposed for 24 h also contains a weak reflection at 2θ
= 8.9° that may correspond to a hydrated lead-passivated K bromide
compound (e.g., KPbBr3·H20),[41] with the SEM-EDX showing the presence of K-
and Br-rich needle-like crystals on the sample surface (Figure c); a precise chemical identification
is not possible at this stage.[42]
Figure 5
XRD patterns
of (a) TC, (b) Rb-passivated TC, and (c) K-passivated
TC perovskite thin films on glass exposed to humid nitrogen (50% RH)
for the stated times. The features are assigned as stated; we assign
the feature marked * to be the yellow δ-phase of Cs-rich (Cs,FA,MA)(I0.85Br0.15)3. (d) Peak position, (e)
FWHM, and (f) peak area for the perovskite thin films over time.
XRD patterns
of (a) TC, (b) Rb-passivated TC, and (c) K-passivated
TC perovskite thin films on glass exposed to humid nitrogen (50% RH)
for the stated times. The features are assigned as stated; we assign
the feature marked * to be the yellow δ-phase of Cs-rich (Cs,FA,MA)(I0.85Br0.15)3. (d) Peak position, (e)
FWHM, and (f) peak area for the perovskite thin films over time.In Figure d–f,
we analyze the changes in the primary perovskite peak at 2θ
≈ 14.1° (Figure d), the full width at half-maximum (FWHM) (Figure e), and the peak area (Figure f) for the films
at different exposure times. We observe that for both Rb- and K-passivated
TC films, the perovskite peak is shifted toward lower angles relative
to the peak from the TC sample, which indicates expansion of the perovskite
lattice and is in agreement with previous reports.[18,25] This could be due to partial extraction of bromide from the perovskite
lattice by the passivating additives or to the passivating species
occupying interstitial sites. We note that we have not seen any significant
trend on the perovskite peak position upon humidity treatment, suggesting
that these effects are not further affected by humidity exposure.
We find that the FWHM drops significantly and the peak intensity (area)
increases upon humidity treatment for the TC and K-passivated TC perovskite
films, which is in agreement with the grain coalescence that we reported
earlier (Figure ).
By contrast, these parameters remain similar for the Rb-passivated
TC after humidity exposure in which the grain sizes remain similar.In conclusion, we investigated the optoelectronic properties and
chemical stability of state-of-the-art TC perovskite films passivated
with K and Rb halides. We found that the luminescence efficiency increases
to higher levels with K than that with Rb owing to the tolerance of
the TC perovskites for higher loadings of K than Rb. We found that
K selectively binds to bromide and Rb to iodide, and the increased
tolerance of the perovskites to K over Rb is dictated by the enhanced
solubility of KBr over Rb halides in the precursor solvents (i.e.,
DMF/DMSO).[31,32] At loadings above 5% Rb, large
Rbhalide-rich crystals form that negatively impact the performance,
while K-based films retain their optimal performance even at 10% loading.
We also observe that this unwanted crystal formation is exaggerated
when exposed to humidity. At low humidity levels (∼30%), the
Rb-rich phases form while the pristine and K-passivated TC perovskite
films remain unaffected; this is attributed to the greater solubility
of Rb halides in water over KBr and PbI2. Under higher
humidity conditions (∼50%), we detect the appearance of PbI2 at the GBs and Cs-rich crystals for the TC films, segregation
of Rb-rich phases in Rb-passivated TC films, and formation of a K-bromide
phase in the K-passivated TC films. Interestingly, we found significant
grain coalescence in the TC and K-passivated TC samples upon humidity
treatment that further enhances the radiative efficiency of the perovskite
thin films.These results represent an important advance in
understanding the
local chemistry and the structural stability of the state-of-the-art
perovskite thin films to push optoelectronic devices to their efficiency
limits. Our work highlights the benefits but also the deficiencies
of these passivation approaches. We speculate that the primary role
of these additives is to manage halides and vacancies, but the resulting
K- or Rb-rich species that immobilize the unwanted excess halide yet
are redundant after processing (albeit electrically benign) may even
compromise humidity stability. Future efforts should consider facile
post-treatment processes to remove the additives after their role
in film formation and passivation is complete, as well as novel approaches
to exploit the grain coalescence to maximize optoelectronic properties
such as luminescence and charge collection in full device structures.
Authors: Aditya Sadhanala; Felix Deschler; Tudor H Thomas; Siân E Dutton; Karl C Goedel; Fabian C Hanusch; May L Lai; Ullrich Steiner; Thomas Bein; Pablo Docampo; David Cahen; Richard H Friend Journal: J Phys Chem Lett Date: 2014-07-10 Impact factor: 6.475
Authors: Woon Seok Yang; Jun Hong Noh; Nam Joong Jeon; Young Chan Kim; Seungchan Ryu; Jangwon Seo; Sang Il Seok Journal: Science Date: 2015-05-21 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael Saliba; Taisuke Matsui; Konrad Domanski; Ji-Youn Seo; Amita Ummadisingu; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Wolfgang R Tress; Antonio Abate; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel Journal: Science Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Luis M Pazos-Outón; Monika Szumilo; Robin Lamboll; Johannes M Richter; Micaela Crespo-Quesada; Mojtaba Abdi-Jalebi; Harry J Beeson; Milan Vrućinić; Mejd Alsari; Henry J Snaith; Bruno Ehrler; Richard H Friend; Felix Deschler Journal: Science Date: 2016-03-25 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: David P McMeekin; Golnaz Sadoughi; Waqaas Rehman; Giles E Eperon; Michael Saliba; Maximilian T Hörantner; Amir Haghighirad; Nobuya Sakai; Lars Korte; Bernd Rech; Michael B Johnston; Laura M Herz; Henry J Snaith Journal: Science Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Zhi-Kuang Tan; Reza Saberi Moghaddam; May Ling Lai; Pablo Docampo; Ruben Higler; Felix Deschler; Michael Price; Aditya Sadhanala; Luis M Pazos; Dan Credgington; Fabian Hanusch; Thomas Bein; Henry J Snaith; Richard H Friend Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2014-08-03 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Samuel D Stranks; Giles E Eperon; Giulia Grancini; Christopher Menelaou; Marcelo J P Alcocer; Tomas Leijtens; Laura M Herz; Annamaria Petrozza; Henry J Snaith Journal: Science Date: 2013-10-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Michael Saliba; Taisuke Matsui; Ji-Youn Seo; Konrad Domanski; Juan-Pablo Correa-Baena; Mohammad Khaja Nazeeruddin; Shaik M Zakeeruddin; Wolfgang Tress; Antonio Abate; Anders Hagfeldt; Michael Grätzel Journal: Energy Environ Sci Date: 2016-03-29 Impact factor: 38.532
Authors: Adam D Wright; Carla Verdi; Rebecca L Milot; Giles E Eperon; Miguel A Pérez-Osorio; Henry J Snaith; Feliciano Giustino; Michael B Johnston; Laura M Herz Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2016-05-26 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Timo Neumann; Sascha Feldmann; Philipp Moser; Alex Delhomme; Jonathan Zerhoch; Tim van de Goor; Shuli Wang; Mateusz Dyksik; Thomas Winkler; Jonathan J Finley; Paulina Plochocka; Martin S Brandt; Clément Faugeras; Andreas V Stier; Felix Deschler Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-06-09 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Mohammad Rahil; Rashid Malik Ansari; Chandra Prakash; S S Islam; Ambesh Dixit; Shahab Ahmad Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2022-02-09 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Tarek I Alanazi; Onkar S Game; Joel A Smith; Rachel C Kilbride; Claire Greenland; Rahul Jayaprakash; Kyriacos Georgiou; Nicholas J Terrill; David G Lidzey Journal: RSC Adv Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 4.036
Authors: Elizabeth M Tennyson; Kyle Frohna; William K Drake; Florent Sahli; Terry Chien-Jen Yang; Fan Fu; Jérémie Werner; Cullen Chosy; Alan R Bowman; Tiarnan A S Doherty; Quentin Jeangros; Christophe Ballif; Samuel D Stranks Journal: ACS Energy Lett Date: 2021-05-28 Impact factor: 23.101