Literature DB >> 30699403

An open source autocorrelation-based method for fetal heart rate estimation from one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound.

Camilo E Valderrama1, Lisa Stroux, Nasim Katebi, Elianna Paljug, Rachel Hall-Clifford, Peter Rohloff, Faezeh Marzbanrad, Gari D Clifford.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Open research on fetal heart rate (FHR) estimation is relatively rare, and evidence for the utility of metrics derived from Doppler ultrasound devices has historically remained hidden in the proprietary documentation of commercial entities, thereby inhibiting its assessment and improvement. Nevertheless, recent studies have attempted to improve FHR estimation; however, these methods were developed and tested using datasets composed of few subjects and are therefore unlikely to be generalizable on a population level. The work presented here introduces a reproducible and generalizable autocorrelation (AC)-based method for FHR estimation from one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound (1D-DUS) signals. APPROACH: Simultaneous fetal electrocardiogram (fECG) and 1D-DUS signals generated by a hand-held Doppler transducer in a fixed position were captured by trained healthcare workers in a European hospital. The fECG QRS complexes were identified using a previously published fECG extraction algorithm and were then over-read to ensure accuracy. An AC-based method to estimate FHR was then developed on this data, using a total of 721 1D-DUS segments, each 3.75 s long, and parameters were tuned with Bayesian optimization. The trained FHR estimator was tested on two additional (independent) hand-annotated Doppler-only datasets recorded with the same device but on different populations: one composed of 3938 segments (from 99 fetuses) acquired in rural Guatemala, and another composed of 894 segments (from 17 fetuses) recorded in a hospital in the UK. MAIN
RESULTS: The proposed AC-based method was able to estimate FHR within 10% of the reference FHR values 96% of the time, with an accuracy of 97% for manually identified good quality segments in both of the independent test sets. SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first work to publish open source code for FHR estimation from 1D-DUS data. The method was shown to satisfy estimations within 10% of the reference FHR values and it therefore defines a minimum accuracy for the field to match or surpass. Our work establishes a basis from which future methods can be developed to more accurately estimate FHR variability for assessing fetal wellbeing from 1D-DUS signals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30699403      PMCID: PMC8325598          DOI: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab033d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Meas        ISSN: 0967-3334            Impact factor:   2.833


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of short term variability indexes in cardiotocographic foetal monitoring.

Authors:  M Cesarelli; M Romano; P Bifulco
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2009-02-03       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Evaluation of the accuracy of a new ultrasonic fetal heart rate monitor.

Authors:  N H Lauersen; H M Hochberg; M E George
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1976-08-15       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Agreement and accuracy using the FIGO, ACOG and NICE cardiotocography interpretation guidelines.

Authors:  Susana Santo; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Cristina Costa-Santos; William Schnettler; Austin Ugwumadu; Luís M Da Graça
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.636

4.  An ECG simulator for generating maternal-foetal activity mixtures on abdominal ECG recordings.

Authors:  Joachim Behar; Fernando Andreotti; Sebastian Zaunseder; Qiao Li; Julien Oster; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2014-07-29       Impact factor: 2.833

5.  The acoustics of normal and nasal vowel production.

Authors:  M F Schwartz
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1968-04

Review 6.  Cardiotocography and beyond: a review of one-dimensional Doppler ultrasound application in fetal monitoring.

Authors:  Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 2.833

7.  Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records.

Authors:  G S Dawes; G H Visser; J D Goodman; C W Redman
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1981-09-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The information content of Doppler ultrasound signals from the fetal heart.

Authors:  S A Shakespeare; J A Crowe; B R Hayes-Gill; K Bhogal; D K James
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  What is the "normal" fetal heart rate?

Authors:  Stephanie Pildner von Steinburg; Anne-Laure Boulesteix; Christian Lederer; Stefani Grunow; Sven Schiermeier; Wolfgang Hatzmann; Karl-Theodor M Schneider; Martin Daumer
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Template-based Quality Assessment of the Doppler Ultrasound Signal for Fetal Monitoring.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 4.566

View more
  3 in total

1.  Unsupervised hidden semi-Markov model for automatic beat onset detection in 1D Doppler ultrasound.

Authors:  Nasim Katebi; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Lisa Stroux; Camilo E Valderrama; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-09-18       Impact factor: 2.688

2.  A Proxy for Detecting IUGR Based on Gestational Age Estimation in a Guatemalan Rural Population.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Rachel Hall-Clifford; Peter Rohloff; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Front Artif Intell       Date:  2020-08-07

Review 3.  A review of fetal cardiac monitoring, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Camilo E Valderrama; Nasim Ketabi; Faezeh Marzbanrad; Peter Rohloff; Gari D Clifford
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 2.688

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.