Carla L DeSisto1, Charlan D Kroelinger2, Cameron Estrich3, Alisa Velonis3, Keriann Uesugi1, David A Goodman4, Ellen Pliska5, Sanaa Akbarali5, Kristin M Rankin1. 1. 1 Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 2. 2 Division of Reproductive Health, Field Support Branch, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA. 3. 3 Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. 4. 4 Division of Reproductive Health, Maternal Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Chamblee, GA, USA. 5. 5 Association of State and Territorial Health Officials, Arlington, VA, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Implementation science provides useful tools for guiding and evaluating the integration of evidence-based interventions with standard practice. The objective of our study was to demonstrate the usefulness of applying an implementation science framework-the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-to increase understanding of implementation of complex statewide public health initiatives, using the example of Medicaid immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) policies. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with the 13 state teams participating in the Immediate Postpartum LARC Learning Community. We asked teams to describe the implementation facilitators, barriers, and strategies in 8 focus areas of the Learning Community. We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews and then coded each interview according to the domains and constructs (ie, theoretical concepts) of the CFIR. RESULTS: Cosmopolitanism (ie, networking with external organizations) was the most frequently coded construct of the framework. A related construct was networks and communications (ie, the nature and quality of social networks and formal and informal communications in an organization). Within the construct of cost, state teams identified barriers that were often unable to be overcome. Trialability (ie, ability to test the intervention on a small scale) and engaging champions (ie, attracting and involving persons who dedicate themselves to supporting the intervention in an organization) were among the most salient constructs of the framework and were the sources of many implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: State leaders and program staff members may benefit from considering the CFIR domains and constructs in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of complex statewide public health initiatives.
OBJECTIVES: Implementation science provides useful tools for guiding and evaluating the integration of evidence-based interventions with standard practice. The objective of our study was to demonstrate the usefulness of applying an implementation science framework-the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR)-to increase understanding of implementation of complex statewide public health initiatives, using the example of Medicaid immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) policies. METHODS: We conducted semistructured telephone interviews with the 13 state teams participating in the Immediate Postpartum LARC Learning Community. We asked teams to describe the implementation facilitators, barriers, and strategies in 8 focus areas of the Learning Community. We audio-recorded and transcribed interviews and then coded each interview according to the domains and constructs (ie, theoretical concepts) of the CFIR. RESULTS: Cosmopolitanism (ie, networking with external organizations) was the most frequently coded construct of the framework. A related construct was networks and communications (ie, the nature and quality of social networks and formal and informal communications in an organization). Within the construct of cost, state teams identified barriers that were often unable to be overcome. Trialability (ie, ability to test the intervention on a small scale) and engaging champions (ie, attracting and involving persons who dedicate themselves to supporting the intervention in an organization) were among the most salient constructs of the framework and were the sources of many implementation strategies. CONCLUSIONS: State leaders and program staff members may benefit from considering the CFIR domains and constructs in the planning, implementation, and evaluation of complex statewide public health initiatives.
Authors: Lisa M Goldthwaite; Lindsey Duca; Randi K Johnson; Danielle Ostendorf; Jeanelle Sheeder Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Katherine S Kellom; Meredith Matone; Aderinola Adejare; Frances K Barg; David M Rubin; Peter F Cronholm Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2018-06
Authors: Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Debra J Kane; Rebekah E Gee; Lyn Kieltyka; Brittni N Frederiksen; Katharyn M Baca; Kristin M Rankin; David A Goodman; Charlan D Kroelinger; Wanda D Barfield Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2018-03-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Laura J Damschroder; David C Aron; Rosalind E Keith; Susan R Kirsh; Jeffery A Alexander; Julie C Lowery Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2009-08-07 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Mary Kate Weber; Emmy L Tran; Charlan D Kroelinger; Celeste Ellison; Trisha Mueller; Lisa Romero; Kecia L Ellick; Marion E Rice; Gabriela Garcia; Ellen Pliska; Sanaa Akbarali; Ramya Dronamraju; Katrin Patterson; S Nicole Fehrenbach; Wanda D Barfield Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2022-02 Impact factor: 3.017
Authors: Kristine Hopkins; Courtney Remington; Michelle A Eilers; Saul D Rivas; Cristina Wallace Huff; Lee David Moore; Raymond Moss Hampton; Tony Ogburn Journal: Contraception Date: 2021-11-05 Impact factor: 3.051
Authors: Charlan D Kroelinger; Donna Addison; Mirelys Rodriguez; Marion E Rice; Meghan T Frey; Hadley R Hickner; Mary Kate Weber; Trish Mueller; Alisa Velonis; Keriann Uesugi; Lisa Romero; Sanaa Akbarali; Natalie Foster; Jean Y Ko; Ellen Pliska; Christine Mackie; Shanna Cox; S Nicole Fehrenbach; Wanda D Barfield Journal: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Date: 2020-03-13 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Charlan D Kroelinger; Ekwutosi M Okoroh; Keriann Uesugi; Lisa Romero; Olivia R Sappenfield; Julia F Howland; Shanna Cox Journal: Womens Health Issues Date: 2021-10-01