Literature DB >> 30699072

The Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry: development of a digital chronic pain registry and baseline data from 1,712 patients.

Lars-Petter Granan1,2,3, Silje Endresen Reme2,4,5, Henrik Børsting Jacobsen2,4,6, Audun Stubhaug2,4,7, Tone Marte Ljoså2,4,8.   

Abstract

Background and aims Chronic pain is a leading cause to years lived with disability worldwide. However, few of the interventions used in pain medicine have proven efficacy, and evidence from the existing studies may not be valid for the general pain population. Therefore, it is of utmost need that we describe chronic pain conditions in their most relevant aspects, their various guises, as well as the real world outcomes of our clinical interventions. The most obvious and crude way to make these assessments are through large registries where patient characteristics, treatment characteristics (including but not limited to what, when, how often and by whom), treatment outcomes and patient outcomes are scrutinized and recorded. Methods and results This article describes in detail the design and baseline data of the comprehensive Oslo University Hospital Pain Registry (OPR). OPR is the local registry of the largest university and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinic in Norway. Data registration started in October 2015, and approximately 1,000 patients are assessed and treated at the clinic each year. During the first 2 years of running the OPR (through September 2017), a total of 1,712 patient baseline reports were recorded from 2,001 patients. Clinicians enter data about relevant treatments and interventions, while patients provide self-reported data on aspects related to pain and pain management. The patients complete an electronic registration immediately before their first consultation at the outpatient pain clinic. The baseline questions of the OPR cover: Basic demographics; The Modified Oswestry Disability Index to assess general function; A pain drawing to assess pain location; Questions regarding the temporal aspects of pain; Six 0-10 Numeric Rating Scales to assess pain intensity and bothersomeness; The EQ-5D-5L to measure health-related quality of life; The Hopkins Symptom Check List-25 to assess psychological distress; A single question about self-rated health; The general self-efficacy scale to assess the patient's perceived self-efficacy; The Bodily Distress Syndrome checklist to assess functional disorders; The Injustice Experience Questionnaire to assess whether the patients experience injustice; Chalder Fatigue Questionnaire to assess fatigue; The Insomnia Severity Index to assesses the levels of insomnia symptoms; The Pain Catastrophizing Scale to measure pain catastrophizing and exaggerated negative orientation toward pain stimuli and pain experience; And the SF36v2 to assess patients' self-report of generic health and wellbeing. The baseline data show that chronic pain patients have a high degree of negative impact in all aspects of their lives. Conclusions and implications The OPR is the most comprehensive pain registry for multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary outpatient pain clinics in Norway. Detailed design of the registry and key baseline data are presented. Registries are of great value in that they enable real world effectiveness outcomes for patients with chronic pain conditions. The OPR can thus serve as a model for similar initiatives elsewhere. The OPR cohort may also serve as a historical control in future studies, both with experimental and observational design.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic pain; effectiveness; epidemiology; patient reported outcome measures; registry

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30699072     DOI: 10.1515/sjpain-2017-0160

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Pain        ISSN: 1877-8860


  6 in total

1.  Early response to JAK inhibitors on central sensitization and pain catastrophizing in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Marina Carotti; Sonia Farah; Luca Ceccarelli; Andrea Giovagnoni; Marco Di Carlo
Journal:  Inflammopharmacology       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 5.093

2.  Comparing objective cognitive impairments in patients with peripheral neuropathic pain or fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Henrik Børsting Jacobsen; Tore C Stiles; Audun Stubhaug; Nils Inge Landrø; Per Hansson
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Self-efficacy and Emotional Distress in a Cohort With Patellofemoral Pain.

Authors:  Alexandra Hott; Are Hugo Pripp; Niels Gunnar Juel; Sigurd Liavaag; Jens Ivar Brox
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-08

4.  The Individual Placement and Support (IPS) in Pain Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial of IPS for Patients with Chronic Pain Conditions.

Authors:  Vigdis Sveinsdottir; Henrik Børsting Jacobsen; Tone Marte Ljosaa; Lene Therese Bergerud Linnemørken; Thomas Knutzen; Reza Ghiasvand; Silje Endresen Reme
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 3.637

5.  Coping expectancies and disability across the new ICD-11 chronic pain categories: A large-scale registry study.

Authors:  Alice Munk; Henrik Børsting Jacobsen; Silje Endresen Reme
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 3.651

6.  A User-Centered Approach to an Evidence-Based Electronic Health Pain Management Intervention for People With Chronic Pain: Design and Development of EPIO.

Authors:  Ingrid Konstanse Ledel Solem; Cecilie Varsi; Hilde Eide; Olöf Birna Kristjansdottir; Elin Børøsund; Karlein M G Schreurs; Lori B Waxenberg; Karen E Weiss; Eleshia J Morrison; Mette Haaland-Øverby; Katherine Bevan; Heidi Andersen Zangi; Audun Stubhaug; Lise Solberg Nes
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-01-21       Impact factor: 5.428

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.