Literature DB >> 30698793

How scientists can take the lead in establishing ethical practices for social media research.

Sherry Pagoto1, Camille Nebeker2.   

Abstract

Social media use has become ubiquitous in the United States, providing unprecedented opportunities for research. However, the rapidly evolving research landscape has far outpaced federal regulations for the protection of human subjects. Recent highly publicized scandals have raised legitimate concerns in the media about how social media data are being used. These circumstances combined with the absence of ethical standards puts even the best intentioned scientists at risk of possible research misconduct. The scientific community may need to lead the charge in insuring the ethical use of social media data in scientific research. We propose 6 steps the scientific community can take to lead this charge. We underscore the important role of funding agencies and universities to create the necessary ethics infrastructure to allow social media research to flourish in a way that is pro-technology, pro-science, and most importantly, pro-humanity. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Facebook; Twitter; ethics; social media

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30698793      PMCID: PMC7587151          DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocy174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  5 in total

1.  Health Apps and Health Policy: What Is Needed?

Authors:  David W Bates; Adam Landman; David M Levine
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Ethical and regulatory challenges of research using pervasive sensing and other emerging technologies: IRB perspectives.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker; John Harlow; Rebeca Espinoza Giacinto; Rubi Orozco-Linares; Cinnamon S Bloss; Nadir Weibel
Journal:  AJOB Empir Bioeth       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

3.  Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks.

Authors:  Adam D I Kramer; Jamie E Guillory; Jeffrey T Hancock
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Privacy Policies for Apps Targeted Toward Youth: Descriptive Analysis of Readability.

Authors:  Gitanjali Das; Cynthia Cheung; Camille Nebeker; Matthew Bietz; Cinnamon Bloss
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2018-01-04       Impact factor: 4.773

5.  Navigating Ethics in the Digital Age: Introducing Connected and Open Research Ethics (CORE), a Tool for Researchers and Institutional Review Boards.

Authors:  John Torous; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total
  10 in total

1.  Re-evaluating standards of human subjects protection for sensitive health data in social media networks.

Authors:  Kar-Hai Chu; Jason Colditz; Jaime Sidani; Michael Zimmer; Brian Primack
Journal:  Soc Networks       Date:  2019-11-20

2.  Opportunities and challenges of using social media big data to assess mental health consequences of the COVID-19 crisis and future major events.

Authors:  Martin Tušl; Anja Thelen; Kailing Marcus; Alexandra Peters; Evgeniya Shalaeva; Benjamin Scheckel; Martin Sykora; Suzanne Elayan; John A Naslund; Ketan Shankardass; Stephen J Mooney; Marta Fadda; Oliver Gruebner
Journal:  Discov Ment Health       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  Using digital technologies in clinical trials: Current and future applications.

Authors:  Carmen Rosa; Lisa A Marsch; Erin L Winstanley; Meg Brunner; Aimee N C Campbell
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 2.226

Review 4.  Building the case for actionable ethics in digital health research supported by artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Camille Nebeker; John Torous; Rebecca J Bartlett Ellis
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.775

5.  A Call for a Public Health Agenda for Social Media Research.

Authors:  Sherry Pagoto; Molly E Waring; Ran Xu
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 5.428

6.  Innovative methods for observing and changing complex health behaviors: four propositions.

Authors:  Guillaume Chevance; Olga Perski; Eric B Hekler
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Social Network Analysis of the Effects of a Social Media-Based Weight Loss Intervention Targeting Adults of Low Socioeconomic Status: Single-Arm Intervention Trial.

Authors:  Ran Xu; David Cavallo
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-04-09       Impact factor: 5.428

8.  A theory-based video intervention to enhance communication and engagement in online health communities: two experiments.

Authors:  Michael Kilb; Oliver Dickhäuser; Jutta Mata
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2022-02-09

9.  Ethics review of big data research: What should stay and what should be reformed?

Authors:  Agata Ferretti; Marcello Ienca; Mark Sheehan; Alessandro Blasimme; Edward S Dove; Bobbie Farsides; Phoebe Friesen; Jeff Kahn; Walter Karlen; Peter Kleist; S Matthew Liao; Camille Nebeker; Gabrielle Samuel; Mahsa Shabani; Minerva Rivas Velarde; Effy Vayena
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 2.652

10.  Lessons Learned: Beta-Testing the Digital Health Checklist for Researchers Prompts a Call to Action by Behavioral Scientists.

Authors:  Rebecca Bartlett Ellis; Julie Wright; Lisa Soederberg Miller; Danielle Jake-Schoffman; Eric B Hekler; Carly M Goldstein; Danielle Arigo; Camille Nebeker
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.