| Literature DB >> 30698307 |
Werner Hettwer1, Peter F Horstmann1, Sabine Bischoff2, Daniel Güllmar3, Jürgen R Reichenbach3, Patrina S P Poh4, Martijn van Griensven4, Florian Gras5, Michael Diefenbeck6,7.
Abstract
Assessment of bone graft material efficacy is difficult in humans, since invasive methods like staged CT scans or biopsies are ethically unjustifiable. Therefore, we developed a novel large animal model for the verification of a potential transformation of synthetic bone graft substitutes into vital bone. The model combines multiple imaging methods with corresponding histology in standardized critical sized cancellous bone defect. Cylindrical bone voids (10 ml) were created in the medial femoral condyles of both hind legs (first surgery at right hind leg, second surgery 3 months later at left hind leg) in three merino-wool sheep and either (i) left empty, filled with (ii) cancellous allograft bone or (iii) a synthetic, gentamicin eluting bone graft substitute. All samples were analysed with radiographs, MRI, μCT, DEXA and histology after sacrifice at 6 months. Unfilled defects only showed ingrowth of fibrous tissue, whereas good integration of the cancellous graft was seen in the allograft group. The bone graft substitute showed centripetal biodegradation and new trabecular bone formation in the periphery of the void as early as 3 months. μCT gave excellent insight into the structural changes within the defects, particularly progressive allograft incorporation and the bone graft substitute biodegradation process. MRI completed the picture by clearly visualizing soft tissue ingrowth into unfilled bone voids and presence of fluid collections. Histology was essential for verification of trabecular bone and osteoid formation. Conventional radiographs and DEXA could not differentiate details of the ongoing transformation process. This model appears well suited for detailed in vivo and ex vivo evaluation of bone graft substitute behaviour within large bone defects.Entities:
Keywords: Animal model; bone graft substitute; calcium sulphate; critical bone defect; hydroxyapatite
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30698307 PMCID: PMC6850422 DOI: 10.1111/apm.12918
Source DB: PubMed Journal: APMIS ISSN: 0903-4641 Impact factor: 3.205
Details of surgery and BV/TV results of μCT evaluation
| Sheep | Side | Graft (in ml) | Sacrifice (in months) | BV (in cm³) | TV (in cm³) | BV/TV (×100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Right | Empty 10 | 6 | 3.45 | 9.83 | 35.10 |
| 1 | Left | Allograft 11 | 3 | 4.86 | 11.48 | 42.33 |
| 2 | Right | CERAMENT®|G 10 | 6 | 5.55 | 9.19 | 60.39 |
| 2 | Left | CERAMENT®|G 11 | 3 | 6.01 | 14.71 | 40.86 |
| 3 | Right | Allograft 10 | 6 | 3.22 | 10.32 | 31.20 |
| 3 | Left | Empty 10 | 3 | 0.06 | 11.73 | 0.51 |
Details of MRI settings
| TE in ms | TR in ms | Slices | Slices thickness in mm | FOV in mm | In‐plane resolution in mm² | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T1w‐TSE | 12 | 684 | 25 | 3 | 160 | 0.4 × 0.4 |
| T2w‐TSE | 103 | 6310 | 25 | 3 | 160 | 0.4 × 0.4 |
| TIRM | 30 | 3060 (TI 200) | 25 | 3 | 160 | 0.5 × 0.5 |
Figure 1Radiographs of the distal femur in anterior–posterior and lateral view post‐operative and at the final follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. (A) Unfilled (empty): post‐operative. (B) Unfilled: follow‐up at 3 months. (C) Unfilled (empty): post‐operative. (D) Unfilled: follow‐up at 6 months. (e) Allograft: post‐operative. (F) Allograft: follow‐up at 3 months. (g) Allograft: post‐operative. (H) Allograft: follow‐up at 6 months. (I) BGS: post‐operative. (J) BGS: follow‐up at 3 months. (K) BGS: post‐operative. (L) BGS: follow‐up at 6 months.
Figure 2μCT images of the distal femur in coronar and axial view at the final follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. 3D reconstruction of μCT scans, colour‐coded according to grey scales, Histology in HE stain, DXA scans of the distal femur at the final follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. (A) Unfilled (empty): follow‐up at 3 months. (B) Unfilled (empty): follow‐up at 6 months. (C) allograft: follow‐up at 3 months. (D) Allograft: follow‐up at 6 months. (E) BGS: follow‐up at 3 months. (F) Bone Graft Substitute: follow‐up at 6 months.
Figure 3MRI images of the distal femur in coronar and transversal view (T1 and T2 weighting at the final follow‐up at 3 or 6 months. (A) unfilled (empty): follow‐up at 3 months. (B) unfilled (empty): follow‐up at 6 months. (C) Allograft: follow‐up at 3 months. (D) allograft: follow‐up at 6 months. (E) BGS: follow‐up at 3 months. (F) BGS: follow‐up at 6 months.