Literature DB >> 19795978

Establishment of a preclinical ovine model for tibial segmental bone defect repair by applying bone tissue engineering strategies.

Johannes C Reichert1, Devakara R Epari, Martin E Wullschleger, Siamak Saifzadeh, Roland Steck, Jasmin Lienau, Scott Sommerville, Ian C Dickinson, Michael A Schütz, Georg N Duda, Dietmar W Hutmacher.   

Abstract

Currently, well-established clinical therapeutic approaches for bone reconstruction are restricted to the transplantation of autografts and allografts, and the implantation of metal devices or ceramic-based implants to assist bone regeneration. Bone grafts possess osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties; however, they are limited in access and availability and associated with donor-site morbidity, hemorrhage, risk of infection, insufficient transplant integration, graft devitalization, and subsequent resorption resulting in decreased mechanical stability. As a result, recent research focuses on the development of alternative therapeutic concepts. The field of tissue engineering has emerged as an important approach to bone regeneration. However, bench-to-bedside translations are still infrequent as the process toward approval by regulatory bodies is protracted and costly, requiring both comprehensive in vitro and in vivo studies. The subsequent gap between research and clinical translation, hence, commercialization, is referred to as the "Valley of Death" and describes a large number of projects and/or ventures that are ceased due to a lack of funding during the transition from product/technology development to regulatory approval and subsequently commercialization. One of the greatest difficulties in bridging the Valley of Death is to develop good manufacturing processes and scalable designs and to apply these in preclinical studies. In this article, we describe part of the rationale and road map of how our multidisciplinary research team has approached the first steps to translate orthopedic bone engineering from bench to bedside by establishing a preclinical ovine critical-sized tibial segmental bone defect model, and we discuss our preliminary data relating to this decisive step.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19795978     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2009.0455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  22 in total

Review 1.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Ovine model for critical-size tibial segmental defects.

Authors:  Chris Christou; Rema A Oliver; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Delayed minimally invasive injection of allogenic bone marrow stromal cell sheets regenerates large bone defects in an ovine preclinical animal model.

Authors:  Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Maria A Woodruff; Roland Steck; Michael Nerlich; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 4.  Controlled release strategies for bone, cartilage, and osteochondral engineering--Part I: recapitulation of native tissue healing and variables for the design of delivery systems.

Authors:  Vítor E Santo; Manuela E Gomes; João F Mano; Rui L Reis
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  [Bone tissue engineering. Reconstruction of critical sized segmental bone defects in the ovine tibia].

Authors:  J C Reichert; D R Epari; M E Wullschleger; A Berner; S Saifzadeh; U Nöth; I C Dickinson; M A Schuetz; D W Hutmacher
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  Advances in translational orthopaedic research with species-specific multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells derived from the umbilical cord.

Authors:  Melina Ramallo; Irene Carreras-Sánchez; Alba López-Fernández; Roberto Vélez; Màrius Aguirre; Sara Feldman; Joaquim Vives
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.303

7.  A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Siamak Saifzadeh; Flavia Medeiros Savi; Constantin E Dlaska; Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Johannes C Reichert; Martin Wullschleger; Jiongyu Ren; Amaia Cipitria; Jacqui A McGovern; Roland Steck; Michael Wagels; Maria Ann Woodruff; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.491

8.  Evaluation of bone regeneration using the rat critical size calvarial defect.

Authors:  Patrick P Spicer; James D Kretlow; Simon Young; John A Jansen; F Kurtis Kasper; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  [Study on the gelatin methacryloyl composite scaffold with exogenous transforming growth factor β 1 to promote the repair of skull defects].

Authors:  Xiangyu Liu; Zhaodong Wang; Chen Xu; Jianzhong Guan; Bangguo Wei; Yajun Liu
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-07-15

10.  Can bone tissue engineering contribute to therapy concepts after resection of musculoskeletal sarcoma?

Authors:  Boris Michael Holzapfel; Mohit Prashant Chhaya; Ferry Petrus Wilhelmus Melchels; Nina Pauline Holzapfel; Peter Michael Prodinger; Ruediger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Martijn van Griensven; Jan-Thorsten Schantz; Maximilian Rudert; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2013-01-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.