| Literature DB >> 30697270 |
Ayşegül Uğur Kurtoğllu1, Belkıs Koçtekin2, Erdal Kurtoğlu3, Mustafa Yildiz4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Hemolysis due to ineffective erythropoiesis is a serious problem β-thalassemia major (β-TM) patients. The role of complement system in the etiopathogenesis of hemolysis observed in β-TM were released. Hemolysis induced by activation of complement system is prevented by complement regulatory proteins. Decay accelerating factor (CD55), membrane inhibitor of reactive lysis (CD59), and complement reception 1 (CR1, CD35) are among these proteins. The absence of these proteins thus accounts for the increased susceptibility of erythrocytes to complement lysis. Splenomegaly and hypersplenism are common complications among thalassemia major patients necessitating splenectomy.Entities:
Keywords: complement regulatory proteins; splenectomy; β-thalassemia
Year: 2018 PMID: 30697270 PMCID: PMC6348341 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2018.81036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Hematological parameters of group 1 and 2 compared to group 3
| Parameter | Group 1 Mean ± SD | Group 2 Mean ± SD | Group 3Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC count [× 1012/l] | 3.27 ±0.28 | 3.18 ±0.45 | 4.83 ±0.4 |
| Hb [g/dl] | 8.92 ±0.79 | 8.57 ±0.81 | 14.3 ±1.35 |
| MCV [fl] | 82.92 ±2.65 | 80.46 ±4.76 | 87.36 ±2.62 |
| MCH [pg] | 27.38 ±1.68 | 27.29 ±1.88 | 29.65 ±1.23 |
| MCHC [g/dl] | 33.02 ±1.52 | 33.92 ±0.99 | 33.97 ±0.86 |
| RDW (%) | 18.28 ±5.17 | 18.28 ±6.72 | 13.32 ±0.69 |
p < 0.05.
Levels of CD55, CD59, and CD35 expression for group 1 compared to group 2
| CD | Group 1 | Group 2 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SD | Median (range) | Mean ± SD | Median (range) | ||
| CD55 | 50.72 ±18.67 | 54.85 (7.4–76.8) | 64.36 ±13.98 | 99.25 (51.4–97.4) | < 0.05 |
| CD59 | 92.3 ±13.65 | 97.4 (54–99.4) | 96.85 ±4.18 | 96.8 (89.6–100) | > 0.05 |
| CD35 | 1.32 ±1.74 | 0.7 (0–7.3) | 5.75 ±6.09 | 2.3 (0–24.6) | < 0.05 |
p < 0.05.
Figure 1Erythrocyte CD55 levels in groups 1, 2 and 3
Values are represented as mean ± SD; ap < 0.05 group 1 compared to group 2, bp < 0.05 group 1 compared to group 3, cp < 0.05 group 2 compared to group 3.
Figure 2Erythrocyte CD59 levels in groups 1, 2 and 3
Values are represented as mean ± SD.
Figure 3Erythrocyte CD35 levels in groups 1, 2 and 3
Values are represented as mean ± SD; ap < 0.05 group 1 compared to group 2, bp < 0.05 group 1 compared to group 3, cp < 0.05 group 2 compared to group 3.