| Literature DB >> 30696918 |
Ho-Kyung Song1, Yu Shi2, Teng Yang2, Haiyan Chu2, Jin-Sheng He3, Hyoki Kim4, Piotr Jablonski5,6, Jonathan M Adams7.
Abstract
Studying how metagenome composition and diversity varies along environmental gradients may improve understanding of the general principles of community and ecosystem structuring. We studied soil bacterial metagenomes along a precipitation gradient on the eastern Tibetan Plateau, varying between 500 mm and 60 mm mean annual precipitation (MAP). We found that lower MAP was strongly associated with reduced functional diversity of bacterial genes. It appears that extreme environmental conditions associated with aridity constrain the diversity of functional strategies present in soil biota - analogous to broad scale patterns found in plant functional diversity along environmental gradients. In terms of specific functions, more extreme arid conditions were also associated with increased relative abundance of genes related to dormancy and osmoprotectants. Decreased relative abundance of genes related to antibiotic resistance and virulence in more arid conditions suggests reduced intensity of biotic interaction under extreme physiological conditions. These trends parallel those seen in earlier, more preliminary comparisons of metagenomes across biomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30696918 PMCID: PMC6351613 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-37565-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1RDA result (Subsystem Level 3) showing sample distribution based on bacterial functional gene composition along the environmental gradient in Tibet. Vegetation types are indicated, with MAP of alpine meadow > alpine steppe > desert steppe. MAP: mean annual precipitation (mm), SM: soil moisture (g/g dried soil), SOC: soil organic carbon (%), STP: soil total phosphorous (%).
Figure 2Heatmap of Z-score transformed relative abundance of Subsystem Level 1 genes in samples along the gradient of mean annual precipitation (mm).
Figure 3Subsystem Level 3 functional gene richness against bacterial OTU richness. (A) Subsystem Level 3 functional gene Shannon diversity against bacterial OTU Shannon diversity. (B) Linear regression line was applied only when significant. Presented R-squared value is adjusted R-squared value.
Figure 4Subsystem Level 3 functional gene richness against mean annual precipitation. (A) Subsystem Level 3 functional gene Shannon diversity against mean annual precipitation. (B) Linear regression line was applied. Presented R-squared value is adjusted R-squared value.
Figure 5Functional beta diversity of bacterial functional genes, amongst samples from each vegetation type calculated based on Bray-Curtis dissimilarity of Subsystem Level 3 genes from group centroid. Alphabet denotes posthoc test result of Tukey’s HSD.