Beiqun Zhao1, Griffin A Tyree2, Timothy C Lin2, Florin Vaida3, Blake J Stock4, Thomas A Hamelin4, Bryan M Clary5. 1. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. Electronic address: beiqunmzhao@gmail.com. 2. School of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 3. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California. 4. Surgery, Anesthesiology, Musculoskeletal, Neurology, and Imaging Services, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California. 5. Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Surgical supplies occupy a large portion of health care expenditures but is often under the surgeon's control. We sought to assess whether an automated, surgeon-directed, cost feedback system can decrease supply expenditures for five common general surgery procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated "surgical receipt" detailing intraoperative supply costs was generated and emailed to surgeons after each case. We compared the median cost per case for 18 mo before and after implementation of the surgical receipt. We controlled for price fluctuations by applying common per-unit prices in both periods. We also compared the incision time, case length booking accuracy, length of stay, and postoperative occurrences. RESULTS: Median costs decreased significantly for open inguinal hernia ($433.45 to $385.49, P < 0.001), laparoscopic cholecystectomy ($886.77 to $816.13, P = 0.002), and thyroidectomy ($861.21 to $825.90, P = 0.034). Median costs were unchanged for laparoscopic appendectomy and increased significantly for lumpectomy ($325.67 to $420.53, P < 0.001). There was an increase in incision-to-closure minutes for open inguinal hernia (71 to 75 min, P < 0.001) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (75 to 96 min, P < 0.001), but a decrease in thyroidectomy (79 to 73 min, P < 0.001). There was an increase in booking accuracy for laparoscopic appendectomy (38.6% to 55.0%, P = 0.001) and thyroidectomy (32.5% to 48.1%, P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative occurrence rates and length of stay duration. CONCLUSIONS: An automated surgeon-directed surgical receipt may be a useful tool to decrease supply costs for certain procedures. However, curtailing surgical supply costs with surgeon-directed cost feedback alone is challenging and a multimodal approach may be necessary. Published by Elsevier Inc.
BACKGROUND: Surgical supplies occupy a large portion of health care expenditures but is often under the surgeon's control. We sought to assess whether an automated, surgeon-directed, cost feedback system can decrease supply expenditures for five common general surgery procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An automated "surgical receipt" detailing intraoperative supply costs was generated and emailed to surgeons after each case. We compared the median cost per case for 18 mo before and after implementation of the surgical receipt. We controlled for price fluctuations by applying common per-unit prices in both periods. We also compared the incision time, case length booking accuracy, length of stay, and postoperative occurrences. RESULTS: Median costs decreased significantly for open inguinal hernia ($433.45 to $385.49, P < 0.001), laparoscopic cholecystectomy ($886.77 to $816.13, P = 0.002), and thyroidectomy ($861.21 to $825.90, P = 0.034). Median costs were unchanged for laparoscopic appendectomy and increased significantly for lumpectomy ($325.67 to $420.53, P < 0.001). There was an increase in incision-to-closure minutes for open inguinal hernia (71 to 75 min, P < 0.001) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (75 to 96 min, P < 0.001), but a decrease in thyroidectomy (79 to 73 min, P < 0.001). There was an increase in booking accuracy for laparoscopic appendectomy (38.6% to 55.0%, P = 0.001) and thyroidectomy (32.5% to 48.1%, P = 0.001). There were no differences in postoperative occurrence rates and length of stay duration. CONCLUSIONS: An automated surgeon-directed surgical receipt may be a useful tool to decrease supply costs for certain procedures. However, curtailing surgical supply costs with surgeon-directed cost feedback alone is challenging and a multimodal approach may be necessary. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Authors: Matthew Gitelis; Yalini Vigneswaran; Michael B Ujiki; Woody Denham; Mark Talamonti; Joseph P Muldoon; John G Linn Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Corinna C Zygourakis; Victoria Valencia; Christopher Moriates; Christy K Boscardin; Sereina Catschegn; Alvin Rajkomar; Kevin J Bozic; Kent Soo Hoo; Andrew N Goldberg; Lawrence Pitts; Michael T Lawton; R Adams Dudley; Ralph Gonzales Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Kyle H Cichos; Paul L Linsky; Benjamin Wei; Douglas J Minnich; Robert J Cerfolio Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Christian H Tabib; Clinton D Bahler; Thomas J Hardacker; Kevin M Ball; Chandru P Sundaram Journal: J Endourol Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Marinus J C Eijkemans; Mark van Houdenhoven; Tien Nguyen; Eric Boersma; Ewout W Steyerberg; Geert Kazemier Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Michael J Guzman; Matthew E Gitelis; John G Linn; Michael B Ujiki; Matthew Waskerwitz; Konstantin Umanskiy; Joseph P Muldoon Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 4.585