Franklin Dexter1, Richard H Epstein. 1. Division of Management Consulting, Department of Anesthesia, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. franklin-dexter@uiowa.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review focuses on six papers published in 2004 that pertain to operating room (OR) efficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: When to release OR time was much less important than was having the correct OR allocations in the first place. If OR time must be released, then this decision should be based on the historical scheduled workload. Several interventions combined can reduce average turnover times by 7 min per case, probably reducing labor costs by approximately 1.5%. Use of a block room for patients undergoing brachial plexus anesthesia for upper extremity surgery reduces overall OR time by 4 min per upper extremity case. Improving prediction of case duration can reduce over-utilized OR time by just 5.4 min per OR per workday. SUMMARY: Interventions studied included changing when OR time was released, reducing surgical times, reducing turnover times, reducing OR times with block rooms, and improving prediction of case duration. The incremental improvements in OR efficiency and reductions in labor costs were small as compared with allocating OR time and scheduling cases appropriately.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The review focuses on six papers published in 2004 that pertain to operating room (OR) efficiency. RECENT FINDINGS: When to release OR time was much less important than was having the correct OR allocations in the first place. If OR time must be released, then this decision should be based on the historical scheduled workload. Several interventions combined can reduce average turnover times by 7 min per case, probably reducing labor costs by approximately 1.5%. Use of a block room for patients undergoing brachial plexus anesthesia for upper extremity surgery reduces overall OR time by 4 min per upper extremity case. Improving prediction of case duration can reduce over-utilized OR time by just 5.4 min per OR per workday. SUMMARY: Interventions studied included changing when OR time was released, reducing surgical times, reducing turnover times, reducing OR times with block rooms, and improving prediction of case duration. The incremental improvements in OR efficiency and reductions in labor costs were small as compared with allocating OR time and scheduling cases appropriately.
Authors: Faisal G Bakaeen; Joseph Huh; Danny Chu; Joseph S Coselli; Scott A LeMaire; Kenneth L Mattox; Matthew J Wall; Xing Li Wang; Salwa A Shenaq; Prasad V Atluri; Samir S Awad; David H Berger Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2008
Authors: Beiqun Zhao; Griffin A Tyree; Timothy C Lin; Florin Vaida; Blake J Stock; Thomas A Hamelin; Bryan M Clary Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2018-12-13 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Patrick J Tighe; Meghan Brennan; Michael Moser; Andre P Boezaart; Azra Bihorac Journal: Reg Anesth Pain Med Date: 2012 May-Jun Impact factor: 6.288
Authors: Patrick J Tighe; Stephen D Lucas; David A Edwards; André P Boezaart; Haldun Aytug; Azra Bihorac Journal: Pain Med Date: 2012-09-07 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Eli M Cahan; Henry C Cousins; Joshua T Steere; Nicole A Segovia; Matthew D Miller; Derek F Amanatullah Journal: Bone Joint J Date: 2021-02 Impact factor: 5.082