Literature DB >> 30694605

Cancer core length from targeted biopsy: an index of prostate cancer volume and pathological stage.

Demetrios N Simopoulos1, Anthony E Sisk2, Alan Priester1, Ely R Felker3, Lorna Kwan1, Merdie K Delfin1, Robert E Reiter1, Leonard S Marks1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To study the relationship of maximum cancer core length (MCCL), on targeted biopsy (TB) of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-visible index lesions, to volume of that tumour found at radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In all, 205 men undergoing fusion biopsy and RP were divided into two groups: 136 in whom the MCCL came from an index MRI-visible lesion (TB) and 69 in whom MCCL came from a non-targeted lesion (non-targeted biopsy [NTB]). MRI was 3-T multi-parametric and biopsy was via MRI-ultrasonography fusion.
RESULTS: In the TB group, MCCL correlated with volume of clinically significant index tumours (ρ = 0.44-0.60, P < 0.01). The correlation was similar for first and repeat biopsy and for transition and peripheral zone lesions (ρ = 0.42-0.49, P < 0.01). No correlations were found in the NTB group. TB MCCL (6-10 and >10 mm) and MRI lesion diameter (>20 mm) were independently associated with tumour volume. TB MCCLs >10 mm and Gleason scores >7 were each associated with pathological T3 disease (odds ratios 5.73 and 5.04, respectively), but MRI lesion diameter lesion was not.
CONCLUSIONS: MCCL on a TB from an MRI-visible lesion is an independent predictor of both cancer volume and pathological stage. This relationship does not exist for MCCL from a NTB core. Quantifying CCL on MRI-TBs may have a value, not previously described, to risk-stratify patients with prostate cancer before treatment.
© 2019 The Authors BJU International © 2019 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990magnetic resonance imagingzzm321990; #PCSM; #ProstateCancer; tumour volume

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694605      PMCID: PMC6641990          DOI: 10.1111/bju.14691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.969


  30 in total

1.  The index lesion and the origin of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Maisa M Q Quintal; Luciana R Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J E McNeal; A A Villers; E A Redwine; F S Freiha; T A Stamey
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Preoperative prediction of small volume cancer (less than 0.5 ml) in radical prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Liang Cheng; Christopher K Poulos; Chong-Xian Pan; Timothy D Jones; Joanne K Daggy; John N Eble; Michael O Koch
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 2: T2 substaging and prostate cancer volume.

Authors:  Theo H van der Kwast; Mahul B Amin; Athanase Billis; Jonathan I Epstein; David Griffiths; Peter A Humphrey; Rodolfo Montironi; Thomas M Wheeler; John R Srigley; Lars Egevad; Brett Delahunt
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 7.842

6.  Predicting tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens from patients with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lori E Eichelberger; Michael O Koch; Joanne K Daggy; Thomas M Ulbright; John N Eble; Liang Cheng
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.493

7.  The maximum tumour length in biopsy cores as a predictor of outcome after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Norihiro Hayashi; Mitsuyoshi Urashima; Hidetoshi Kuruma; Yoichi Arai; Sadahito Kuwao; Masatsugu Iwamura; Shin Egawa
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 5.588

8.  Prediction of pathological stages before prostatectomy in prostate cancer patients: analysis of 12 systematic prostate needle biopsy specimens.

Authors:  Eun-Ah Park; Hak Jong Lee; Kwang Gi Kim; Seung Hyup Kim; Sang Eun Lee; Ghee Young Choe
Journal:  Int J Urol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.369

9.  Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue.

Authors:  F Brimo; R T Vollmer; J Corcos; K Kotar; L R Bégin; P A Humphrey; T A Bismar
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.087

10.  Characterizing clinically significant prostate cancer using template prostate mapping biopsy.

Authors:  Hashim Uddin Ahmed; Yipeng Hu; Tim Carter; Nimalan Arumainayagam; Emilie Lecornet; Alex Freeman; David Hawkes; Dean C Barratt; Mark Emberton
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Techniques and Outcomes of MRI-TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Masatomo Kaneko; Dordaneh Sugano; Amir H Lebastchi; Vinay Duddalwar; Jamal Nabhani; Christopher Haiman; Inderbir S Gill; Giovanni E Cacciamani; Andre Luis Abreu
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Risk Estimation of Metastatic Recurrence After Prostatectomy: A Model Using Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy.

Authors:  Thomas Bommelaere; Arnauld Villers; Philippe Puech; Guillaume Ploussard; Julien Labreuche; Elodie Drumez; Xavier Leroy; Jonathan Olivier
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-19

3.  Active surveillance inclusion criteria under scrutiny in magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy: a multicenter cohort study.

Authors:  Kira Kornienko; Fabian Siegel; Angelika Borkowetz; Manuela A Hoffmann; Martin Drerup; Verena Lieb; Johannes Bruendl; Thomas Höfner; Hannes Cash; Jost von Hardenberg; Niklas Westhoff
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.455

4.  Combined Systematic and MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy Has the Highest Grading Accuracy When Compared to Final Pathology.

Authors:  Iulia Andras; Emanuel Darius Cata; Andreea Serban; Pierre Kadula; Teodora Telecan; Maximilian Buzoianu; Maria Bungardean; Dan Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-05-22       Impact factor: 2.430

5.  Adverse pathology after radical prostatectomy: the prognostic role of cumulative cancer length >6-mm threshold in prostate cancer-positive biopsies.

Authors:  Simone Morselli; Arcangelo Sebastianelli; Riccardo Campi; Andrea Liaci; Linda Gabellini; Giovanni Tasso; Riccardo Fantechi; Stefano Venturini; Pietro Spatafora; Gianmartin Cito; Graziano Vignolini; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Mauro Gacci; Sergio Serni
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2019-09-30

6.  A critical evaluation of visual proportion of Gleason 4 and maximum cancer core length quantified by histopathologists.

Authors:  Lina Maria Carmona Echeverria; Aiman Haider; Alex Freeman; Urszula Stopka-Farooqui; Avi Rosenfeld; Benjamin S Simpson; Yipeng Hu; David Hawkes; Hayley Pye; Susan Heavey; Vasilis Stavrinides; Joseph M Norris; Ahmed El-Shater Bosaily; Cristina Cardona Barrena; Simon Bott; Louise Brown; Nick Burns-Cox; Tim Dudderidge; Alastair Henderson; Richard Hindley; Richard Kaplan; Alex Kirkham; Robert Oldroyd; Maneesh Ghei; Raj Persad; Shonit Punwani; Derek Rosario; Iqbal Shergill; Mathias Winkler; Hashim U Ahmed; Mark Emberton; Hayley C Whitaker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.