Literature DB >> 18752501

Prognostic value of various morphometric measurements of tumour extent in prostate needle core tissue.

F Brimo1, R T Vollmer, J Corcos, K Kotar, L R Bégin, P A Humphrey, T A Bismar.   

Abstract

AIMS: Predicting prostatic cancer patients' outcome is a major objective for clinicians and patients. Several nomograms are currently implemented prior to treatment to help predict clinical and pathological outcome. The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of morphometric measurements of cancer on the needle biopsy specimen in relation to the final pathological stage or the biochemical failure status following radical prostatectomy, and to determine which measurement of tumour length in cases with discontinuous foci of cancer (DFC) is most reliably reflective of the pathological stage. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Of the 100 patients included in this study, 34% had high-stage disease (pT >or= 3 and/or pN1) and 16% experienced biochemical recurrence. The analysis showed that fraction of positive cores, total percentage of cancer and both total and greatest millimetric cancer lengths were the variables most closely associated with pathological stage and biochemical failure status.
CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the prognostic value of recording tumour extent in prostatic needle biopsy reporting. However, the results are inconclusive in determining the best method to record tumour length in cores with DFC and larger studies are needed to answer this question fully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18752501     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2008.03087.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histopathology        ISSN: 0309-0167            Impact factor:   5.087


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of two commonly used methods in measurement of cancer volume in prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Viharkumar Patel; Samuel Hubbard; Wei Huang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2020-04-01

Review 2.  What is the pathologist saying? Interpretation of the prostate pathology report.

Authors:  Omar Hameed
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Initial experience with electronic tracking of specific tumor sites in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Christopher P Filson; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.498

4.  Various morphometric measurements of cancer extent on needle prostatic biopsies: which is predictive of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  Maisa M Q Quintal; Luciana R Meirelles; Leandro L L Freitas; Luis A Magna; Ubirajara Ferreira; Athanase Billis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Standardization of reporting discontinuous tumor involvement in prostatic needle biopsy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Min Lu; Shulin Wu; Chin-Lee Wu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.064

6.  Consensus statement with recommendations on active surveillance inclusion criteria and definition of progression in men with localized prostate cancer: the critical role of the pathologist.

Authors:  Rodolfo Montironi; Elizabeth H Hammond; Daniel W Lin; John L Gore; John R Srigley; Hema Samaratunga; Lars Egevad; Mark A Rubin; John Nacey; Laurence Klotz; Howard Sandler; Anthony L Zietman; Stuart Holden; Peter A Humphrey; Andrew J Evans; Brett Delahunt; Jesse K McKenney; Daniel Berney; Thomas M Wheeler; Arul Chinnaiyan; Lawrence True; Beatrice Knudsen; Jonathan I Epstein; Mahul B Amin
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 4.064

7.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients.

Authors:  Chinonyerem Okoro; Arvin K George; M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Nabeel A Shakir; Jason T Rothwax; Dima Raskolnikov; Lambros Stamatakis; Daniel Su; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Maria J Merino; Howard L Parnes; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 2.942

8.  Synoptic Versus Narrative Reporting of Prostate Biopsies at a Tertiary Healthcare Institution: Challenges, successes and expectations.

Authors:  Nnamdi O Orah; Charles C Anunobi; Rufus W Ojewola
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2017-10-10

9.  The impact of core biopsy fragmentation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Leonardo Oliveira Reis; José Alberto Salvo Reinato; Daniel Carlos Silva; Wagner Eduardo Matheus; Fernandes Denardi; Ubirajara Ferreira
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 2.370

10.  Variation in reporting of cancer extent and benign histology in prostate biopsies among European pathologists.

Authors:  D M Berney; F Algaba; P Camparo; E Compérat; D Griffiths; G Kristiansen; A Lopez-Beltran; R Montironi; M Varma; L Egevad
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 4.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.