Literature DB >> 30694386

Experimental validation of the 3-parameter critical power model in cycling.

Giovanni Vinetti1, Anna Taboni2, Paolo Bruseghini2, Stefano Camelio3, Matteo D'Elia3, Nazzareno Fagoni2, Christian Moia4, Guido Ferretti2,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The three-parameter model of critical power (3-p) implies that in the severe exercise intensity domain time to exhaustion (Tlim) decreases hyperbolically with power output starting from the power asymptote (critical power, ẇcr) and reaching 0 s at a finite power limit (ẇ0) thanks to a negative time asymptote (k). We aimed to validate 3-p for short Tlim and to test the hypothesis that ẇ0 represents the maximal instantaneous muscular power.
METHODS: Ten subjects performed an incremental test and nine constant-power trials to exhaustion on an electronically braked cycle ergometer. All trials were fitted to 3-p by means of non-linear regression, and those with Tlim greater than 2 min also to the 2-parameter model (2-p), obtained constraining k to 0 s. Five vertical squat jumps on a force platform were also performed to determine the single-leg (i.e., halved) maximal instantaneous power.
RESULTS: Tlim ranged from 26 ± 4 s to 15.7 ± 4.9 min. In 3-p, with respect to 2-p, ẇcr was identical (177 ± 26 W), while curvature constant W' was higher (17.0 ± 4.3 vs 15.9 ± 4.2 kJ, p < 0.01). 3-p-derived ẇ0 was lower than single-leg maximal instantaneous power (1184 ± 265 vs 1554 ± 235 W, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: 3-p is a good descriptor of the work capacity above ẇcr up to Tlim as short as 20 s. However, since there is a discrepancy between estimated ẇ0 and measured maximal instantaneous power, a modification of the model has been proposed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anaerobic alactic metabolism; Endurance; Hyperbolic model; Non-linear model; Physical work capacity; Power–time relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694386     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-019-04083-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  34 in total

1.  Effect of mathematical modeling on the estimation of critical power.

Authors:  A J Bull; T J Housh; G O Johnson; S R Perry
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The relationship between power and the time to achieve .VO(2max).

Authors:  David W Hill; David C Poole; Jimmy C Smith
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  The relationship between power and time to fatigue in cycle ergometer exercise.

Authors:  D W Hill
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.118

4.  Supra-maximal cycling efficiency assessed in humans by using a new protocol.

Authors:  Laurent Mourot; Frédérique Hintzy; Laurent Messonier; Karim Zameziati; Alain Belli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Maximal instantaneous muscular power after prolonged bed rest in humans.

Authors:  G Ferretti; H E Berg; A E Minetti; C Moia; S Rampichini; M V Narici
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-02

6.  Effects of temperature on the maximal instantaneous muscle power of humans.

Authors:  G Ferretti; M Ishii; C Moia; P Cerretelli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1992

7.  Comparison between maximal power in the power-endurance relationship and maximal instantaneous power.

Authors:  Michel Chatagnon; Jean-Pierre Pouilly; Vincent Thomas; Thierry Busso
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Physiological responses at five estimates of critical velocity.

Authors:  Anthony J Bull; Terry J Housh; Glen O Johnson; Sharon R Rana
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-12-19       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Effect of recovery duration from prior exhaustive exercise on the parameters of the power-duration relationship.

Authors:  C Ferguson; H B Rossiter; B J Whipp; A J Cathcart; S R Murgatroyd; S A Ward
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-01-21

Review 10.  Critical power: implications for determination of V˙O2max and exercise tolerance.

Authors:  Andrew M Jones; Anni Vanhatalo; Mark Burnley; R Hugh Morton; David C Poole
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Novel insights on caffeine supplementation, CYP1A2 genotype, physiological responses and exercise performance.

Authors:  Gabriel Barreto; Beatriz Grecco; Pietro Merola; Caio Eduardo Gonçalves Reis; Bruno Gualano; Bryan Saunders
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A regression method for the power-duration relationship when both variables are subject to error.

Authors:  Giovanni Vinetti; Anna Taboni; Guido Ferretti
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Is a verification phase needed to determine [Formula: see text]O2max across fitness levels?

Authors:  Seth F McCarthy; Jarryd M P Leung; Tom J Hazell
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Anaerobic work capacity in cycling: the effect of computational method.

Authors:  Erik P Andersson; Philipp Bachl; Anna Schmuttermair; Craig A Staunton; Thomas L Stöggl
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-09-17       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  A century of exercise physiology: key concepts on coupling respiratory oxygen flow to muscle energy demand during exercise.

Authors:  Guido Ferretti; Nazzareno Fagoni; Anna Taboni; Giovanni Vinetti; Pietro Enrico di Prampero
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-02-26       Impact factor: 3.346

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.