| Literature DB >> 15241715 |
D W Hill1.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate three critical power (P (critical)) models. Ten university students performed tests that elicited fatigue in > 2 min to approximately 10 min. Power and time data were fit to a 2-parameter hyperbolic model, a 3-parameter hyperbolic model, and a 3-parameter exponential model. Models described the power-time relationship well (R (2) > or = 0.995). However, P (critical) (209 +/- 51 W; SEE: 20 +/- 47 W) and the time constant (198 +/- 87 s; SEE: 103 +/- 246 W) from the exponential model have no obvious meaning. The 2-parameter model produced P (critical) (187 +/- 38 W) and anaerobic work capacity (20.4 +/- 9.0 kJ) that have known physiological meaning, with excellent confidence (SEE: 2 +/- 2 W and 1.0 +/- 1.0 kJ, respectively). Addition of a maximal power parameter to the 2-parameter model did not improve description of the relationship, and the third parameter was superfluous. The 2-parameter model was preferred because, for the range of exercise durations used in this study, it describes the power-relationship adequately and in a most parsimonious fashion.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15241715 DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-815838
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Sports Med ISSN: 0172-4622 Impact factor: 3.118