Literature DB >> 30694321

Implementation of a Health Plan Program for Switching From Analogue to Human Insulin and Glycemic Control Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Type 2 Diabetes.

Jing Luo1, Nazleen F Khan1, Thomas Manetti2,3, Jim Rose3, Ani Kaloghlian3, Balu Gadhe3, Sachin H Jain3, Joshua J Gagne1, Aaron S Kesselheim1.   

Abstract

Importance: Prices for newer analogue insulin products have increased. Lower-cost human insulin may be effective for many patients with type 2 diabetes. Objective: To evaluate the association between implementation of a health plan-based intervention of switching patients from analogue to human insulin and glycemic control. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort study using population-level interrupted times series analysis of members participating in a Medicare Advantage and prescription drug plan operating in 4 US states. Participants were prescribed insulin between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016 (median follow-up, 729 days). The intervention began in February 2015 and was expanded to the entire health plan system by June 2015. Exposures: Implementation of a health plan program to switch patients from analogue to human insulin. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the change in mean hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels estimated over three 12-month periods: preintervention (baseline) in 2014, intervention in 2015, and postintervention in 2016. Secondary outcomes included rates of serious hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia using ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM diagnostic codes.
Results: Over 3 years, 14 635 members (mean [SD] age: 72.5 [9.8] years; 51% women; 93% with type 2 diabetes) filled 221 866 insulin prescriptions. The mean HbA1c was 8.46% (95% CI, 8.40%-8.52%) at baseline and decreased at a rate of -0.02% (95% CI, -0.03% to -0.01%; P <.001) per month before the intervention. There was an association between the start of the intervention and an overall HbA1c level increase of 0.14% (95% CI, 0.05%-0.23%; P = .003) and slope change of 0.02% (95% CI, 0.01%-0.03%; P < .001). After the completion of the intervention, there were no significant differences in changes in the level (0.08% [95% CI, -0.01% to 0.17%]) or slope (<0.001% [95% CI, -0.008% to 0.010%]) of mean HbA1c compared with the intervention period (P = .09 and P = 0.81, respectively). For serious hypoglycemic events, there was no significant association between the start of the intervention and a level (2.66/1000 person-years [95% CI, -3.82 to 9.13]; P = .41) or slope change (-0.66/1000 person-years [95% CI, -1.59 to 0.27]; P = .16). The level (1.64/1000 person-years [95% CI, -4.83 to 8.11]; P = .61) and slope (-0.23/1000 person-years [95% CI, -1.17 to 0.70]; P = .61) changes in the postintervention period were not significantly different compared with the intervention period. The baseline rate of serious hyperglycemia was 22.33 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 12.70-31.97). For the rate of serious hyperglycemic events, there was no significant association between the start of the intervention and a level (4.23/1000 person-years [95% CI, -8.62 to 17.08]; P = .51) or slope (-0.51/1000 person-years [95% CI, -2.37 to 1.34]; P = .58) change. Conclusions and Relevance: Among Medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes, implementation of a health plan program that involved switching patients from analogue to human insulin was associated with a small increase in population-level HbA1c.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30694321      PMCID: PMC6439763          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.21364

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study.

Authors:  I M Stratton; A I Adler; H A Neil; D R Matthews; S E Manley; C A Cull; D Hadden; R C Turner; R R Holman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

2.  Consequences of bias and imprecision in measurements of glucose and hba1c for the diagnosis and prognosis of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Per Hyltoft Petersen; Lone G M Jørgensen; Ivan Brandslund; Niels De Fine Olivarius; Marta Stahl
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl       Date:  2005

3.  Intensive blood glucose control and vascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Anushka Patel; Stephen MacMahon; John Chalmers; Bruce Neal; Laurent Billot; Mark Woodward; Michel Marre; Mark Cooper; Paul Glasziou; Diederick Grobbee; Pavel Hamet; Stephen Harrap; Simon Heller; Lisheng Liu; Giuseppe Mancia; Carl Erik Mogensen; Changyu Pan; Neil Poulter; Anthony Rodgers; Bryan Williams; Severine Bompoint; Bastiaan E de Galan; Rohina Joshi; Florence Travert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  American medical home runs.

Authors:  Arnold Milstein; Elizabeth Gilbertson
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

5.  International Expert Committee report on the role of the A1C assay in the diagnosis of diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 17.152

6.  Intensive glycemic control and the prevention of cardiovascular events: implications of the ACCORD, ADVANCE, and VA diabetes trials: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and a scientific statement of the American College of Cardiology Foundation and the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Jay S Skyler; Richard Bergenstal; Robert O Bonow; John Buse; Prakash Deedwania; Edwin A M Gale; Barbara V Howard; M Sue Kirkman; Mikhail Kosiborod; Peter Reaven; Robert S Sherwin
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients.

Authors:  Matthew C Riddle; Julio Rosenstock; John Gerich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Hertzel C Gerstein; Michael E Miller; Robert P Byington; David C Goff; J Thomas Bigger; John B Buse; William C Cushman; Saul Genuth; Faramarz Ismail-Beigi; Richard H Grimm; Jeffrey L Probstfield; Denise G Simons-Morton; William T Friedewald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-06-06       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 9.  Long-acting insulin analogues versus NPH insulin (human isophane insulin) for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  K Horvath; K Jeitler; A Berghold; S H Ebrahim; T W Gratzer; J Plank; T Kaiser; T R Pieber; A Siebenhofer
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-04-18

10.  Validation of ICD-9-CM coding algorithm for improved identification of hypoglycemia visits.

Authors:  Adit A Ginde; Phillip G Blanc; Rebecca M Lieberman; Carlos A Camargo
Journal:  BMC Endocr Disord       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 2.763

View more
  16 in total

1.  Factors Contributing to the Rising National Cost of Glucose-Lowering Medicines for Diabetes During 2005-2007 and 2015-2017.

Authors:  Xilin Zhou; Sundar S Shrestha; Hui Shao; Ping Zhang
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The Use of Long-Acting Insulin Analogs and the Risk of Colorectal Cancer Among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Richeek Pradhan; Hui Yin; Oriana H Y Yu; Laurent Azoulay
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  Let's Care for Those in Need-Today: Collaborating to Solve the Uninsured Crisis in America.

Authors:  Lee Jacobs
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2020-03-13

4.  Correlates of analog vs human basal insulin use among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Sara J Cromer; Deborah J Wexler; Pooyan Kazemian
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2021-04-20       Impact factor: 5.602

5.  The Cost and Safety of Insulin in Older Adults.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Kasia J Lipska
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 21.873

6.  DIVE/DPV registries: benefits and risks of analog insulin use in individuals 75 years and older with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Gesine van Mark; Sascha R Tittel; Reinhard Welp; Jörg Gloyer; Stefan Sziegoleit; Ralf Barion; Peter M Jehle; Dieter Erath; Peter Bramlage; Stefanie Lanzinger
Journal:  BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care       Date:  2021-06

Review 7.  Origins of the Crisis in Insulin Affordability and Practical Advice for Clinicians on Using Human Insulin.

Authors:  Jing Luo; Walid F Gellad
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 5.430

8.  Low-cost insulin for socially at-risk patients: evidence for effectiveness.

Authors:  Alexandra M Mapp; LeRoi S Hicks; Jennifer N Goldstein
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 9.  The importance of the initial period of basal insulin titration in people with diabetes.

Authors:  Kamlesh Khunti; Francesco Giorgino; Lori Berard; Didac Mauricio; Stewart B Harris
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2020-01-19       Impact factor: 6.577

10.  Comparison of Mortality and Major Cardiovascular Events Among Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Using Human vs Analogue Insulins.

Authors:  Romain Neugebauer; Emily B Schroeder; Kristi Reynolds; Julie A Schmittdiel; Linda Loes; Wendy Dyer; Jay R Desai; Gabriela Vazquez-Benitez; P Michael Ho; Jeff P Anderson; Noel Pimentel; Patrick J O'Connor
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2020-01-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.