| Literature DB >> 30693069 |
Sendar Daniel Nery-Flores1, María Luisa Mendoza-Magaña1, Mario Alberto Ramírez-Herrera1, José de Jesús Ramírez-Vázquez1, Marina María de Jesús Romero-Prado1, César Ricardo Cortez-Álvarez2, Abraham Alberto Ramírez-Mendoza1.
Abstract
Ozone is a harmful tropospheric pollutant, causing the formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species that lead to oxidative damage in living beings. NF-κB can be activated in response to oxidative damage, inducing an inflammatory response. Nowadays, there are no reliable results that consolidate the use of antioxidants to protect from damage caused by ozone, particularly in highly polluted cities. Curcumin has a strong antioxidant activity and is a potent inhibitor of NF-κB activation with no side effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of curcumin in preventive and therapeutic approaches against oxidative damage, NF-κB activation, and the rise in serum levels of IL-1β and TNF-α induced by acute and chronic exposure to ozone in rat hippocampus. One hundred male Wistar rats were distributed into five groups; the intact control, curcumin-fed control, the ozone-exposed group, and the preventive and therapeutic groups. These last two groups were exposed to ozone and received food supplemented with curcumin. Lipid peroxidation was determined by spectrophotometry, and protein oxidation was evaluated by immunodetection of carbonylated proteins and densitometry analysis. Activation of NF-κB was assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA), and inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and TNF-α) were determined by ELISA. Curcumin decreased NF-κB activation and serum levels of inflammatory cytokines as well as protein and lipid oxidation, in both therapeutic and preventive approaches. Curcumin has proven to be a phytodrug against the damage caused by the environmental exposure to ozone.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30693069 PMCID: PMC6332875 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9620684
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oxid Med Cell Longev ISSN: 1942-0994 Impact factor: 6.543
Figure 1(a) Acute lipid peroxidation profile. AOC: acute O3 control; AIC: acute intact control; ACC: acute CUR control; AT: acute therapeutic; AP: acute preventive. ∗Statistical difference between the AOC vs AIC and ACC groups. +Statistical difference between the AOC vs AT and AP groups. (b) Chronic lipid peroxidation profile. COC: chronic O3 control; CIC: chronic intact control; CCC: chronic CUR control; CT: chronic therapeutic; CP: chronic preventive. ∗Statistical difference between the COC vs CIC and CCC groups. +Statistical difference between the COC vs CT and CP groups. Bars represent the concentration of MDA+4-HNE. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2(a) Protein oxidation profile. Representative example of the control and experimental groups. Lanes are numbered for each sample used (n = 5). (b) Densitometry analysis of the protein oxidation profile in the acute phase. ∗Statistical difference between the AOC vs AIC and ACC groups. +Statistical difference between the AOC vs AT and AP groups. (c) Densitometry analysis of the protein oxidation profile in the chronic phase. ∗Statistical difference between COC vs CIC and CCC groups. +Statistical difference between the COC vs CT and CP groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3(a) Representative image of NF-κB activation. AOC showed a strong binding to NF-κB and remained activated at a lower level in the COC group. CUR showed an inhibitory effect against NF-κB activation in the therapeutic and preventive approaches; ns: nonspecific binding. (b) Densitometry analysis of the NF-κB activation profile in the acute exposure to O3. ∗Statistical difference between the AOC vs AIC and ACC groups. +Statistical difference between AOC vs AT and AP groups. #Statistical difference between the AT and AP groups. (c) Densitometry analysis of the NF-κB activation profile in the chronic phase. ∗Statistical difference between the COC vs CIC and CCC groups. +Statistical difference between the COC vs CT and CP groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 4(a) Serum concentration of IL-1β in the acute exposure to O3. ∗Statistical difference between the AOC vs AIC and ACC groups. +Statistical difference between the AOC vs AT and AP groups. #Statistical difference between the AT and AP groups. (b) Serum concentration of IL-1β in the chronic exposure to O3. ∗Statistical difference between the COC and CIC and CCC groups. +Statistical difference between the COC vs CT and CP groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.
Figure 5(a) Serum concentration of TNF-α in the acute exposure to O3. ∗Statistical difference between the AOC vs AIC and ACC groups. +Statistical difference between the AOC vs AT and AP groups. (b) Serum concentration of TNF-α in the chronic exposure to O3. +Statistical difference between the COC and CT groups. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM.