| Literature DB >> 30692232 |
Christopher Chan1, Gill Combes2, Simon Davies3, Fred Finkelstein4, Catherine Firanek5, Rafael Gomez6, Kitty J Jager7, Vivek Jha George8, David W Johnson9, Mark Lambie3, Magdalena Madero10, Ikuto Masakane11, Stephen McDonald12, Madhukar Misra13, Sandip Mitra14, Thyago Moraes15, Annie-Claire Nadeau-Fredette16, Purna Mukhopadhyay17, Jeff Perl1, Ronald Pisoni17, Bruce Robinson17, Dong-Ryeol Ryu18, Rajiv Saran19, James Sloand5, Nidhi Sukul20, Allison Tong21, Cheuk-Chun Szeto22, Wim Van Biesen23.
Abstract
Patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have different options to replace the function of their failing kidneys. The "integrated care" model considers treatment pathways rather than individual renal replacement therapy (RRT) techniques. In such a paradigm, the optimal strategy to plan and enact transitions between the different modalities is very relevant, but so far, only limited data on transitions have been published. Perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health professionals on the process of transitioning are even less well documented. Available literature suggests that poor coordination causes significant morbidity and mortality.This review briefly provides the background, development, and scope of the INTErnational Group Research Assessing Transition Effects in Dialysis (INTEGRATED) initiative. We summarize the literature on the transition between different RRT modalities. Further, we present an international research plan to quantify the epidemiology and to assess the qualitative aspects of transition between different modalities.Entities:
Keywords: Integrated care; barriers; collaboration; international; patient beliefs; planned/unplanned transitions
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30692232 PMCID: PMC6593157 DOI: 10.3747/pdi.2017.00242
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Perit Dial Int ISSN: 0896-8608 Impact factor: 1.756