| Literature DB >> 30691532 |
Aleksei A Korzhenkov1, Stepan V Toshchakov2, Rafael Bargiela3, Huw Gibbard3, Manuel Ferrer4, Alina V Teplyuk1, David L Jones3,5, Ilya V Kublanov6, Peter N Golyshin3,7, Olga V Golyshina8,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: TheEntities:
Keywords: Acid mine drainage (AMD) systems; Acidophilic archaea; Cuniculiplasma; Cuniculiplasmataceae; Mine-impacted environments; Terrestrial miscellaneous Euryarchaeotal group (TMEG); Thermoplasmatales
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30691532 PMCID: PMC6350386 DOI: 10.1186/s40168-019-0623-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microbiome ISSN: 2049-2618 Impact factor: 14.650
Chemical data obtained in the samples of sediment and water of the acidic stream of Parys Mt. Values represent means ± SEM
| Parameter | Unit | Sediment | Water |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electroconductivity | (mS/cm) | 7.41 ± 0.66 | 10.26 ± 0.09 |
| pH | 2.75 ± 0.14 | 1.90 ± 0.05 | |
| Redox | (mV) | 272 ± 38 | 577 |
| Total Al | (mg/kg) | 12,375 ± 2092 | < 1 |
| Total S | (mg/kg) | 1932 ± 543 | 80,754 ± 2260 |
| Total K | (mg/kg) | 8966 ± 1146 | 204 ± 33 |
| Total Ca | (mg/kg) | 574 ± 189 | 1112 ± 38 |
| Total Ti | (mg/kg) | 1642 ± 151 | < 1 |
| Total V | (mg/kg) | 245 ± 34 | < 1 |
| Total Cr | (mg/kg) | 309 ± 71 | 660 ± 74 |
| Total Mn | (mg/kg) | 191 ± 58 | < 1 |
| Total Fe | (g/kg) | 66.7 ± 10.6 | 216.5 ± 5.2 |
| Total Ni | (mg/kg) | 11 ± 1 | < 1 |
| Total Cu | (mg/kg) | 495 ± 108 | 8477 ± 213 |
| Total Zn | (mg/kg) | 632 ± 102 | 10,041 ± 294 |
| Total As | (mg/kg) | 828 ± 51 | 244 ± 23 |
| Total Sr | (mg/kg) | 38 ± 5 | 51 ± 2 |
| Total Pb | (mg/kg) | 4122 ± 1111 | 1491 ± 129 |
| Stone content | (%) | 5.4 ± 2.2 | |
| Dry bulk density | (g/cm3) | 0.87 ± 0.16 | |
| Water filled porosity | (%) | 58.7 ± 0.9 | |
| Air filled porosity | (%) | 8.58 ± 5.47 | |
| Total C | (%) | 2.8 | |
| Total N | (%) | 0.30 | |
| C:N ratio | 9.9 |
Fig. 1Abundance of SSU rRNA barcoded amplicon reads in water and sediment samples of acidic stream. Figure was performed under R programing environment using basic R packages
Fig. 2Taxonomic classification of microbial community from metagenomic DNA sequencing data. Taxonomic classification was obtained using 1GraftM, classifying short reads belonging to marker genes from metagenomic datasets. Graphical representation was performed under R programing environment using basic R packages. https://github.com/geronimp/graftM (This program does not have a publication yet, but they suggest to cite their github page)
Fig. 316S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic reconstruction of Thermoplasmatales clones from Parys Mt samples obtained in the course of this work. V3-V4 hypervariable region amplicon sequences and sequences extracted from metagenome contigs are highlighted by green. Number of amplified sequence variants, corresponding to each branch indicated in brackets. Reference sequences (brown) were taken from the Silva SSU 132 Ref NR 99 database (see the methods section). ‘Plus’ sign denotes presence of corresponding sequences in 16S V3-V4 amplicon, environmental and enrichment metagenomes
Fig. 416S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic relationships of microorganisms from the Terrestrial Miscellaneous Euryarchaeotal Group (TMEG). The tree was constructed using a total of 82 16S rRNA sequences that were assigned and documented in the literature to TMEG, including the clone described in this research (referred as PM clone) and two sequences from Methanosarcina sp. and Methanomassiliicoccus luminyensis, respectively. Environmental pH is shown by coloured dots from acidic (purple) to neutral-low basic (green). Sequences from environments with unknown pH are shown in black. Two distinct clusters of sequences can be identified, corresponding to sequences from acidic (red cluster) and non-acidic environments (green cluster). The list of analysed sequences is presented in the Additional file 2: Table S2 ‘TMEG Data’
Fig. 5Abundance of archaea and bacteria according to the results of metagenomic sequencing of DNA isolated from enrichment cultures with differential pre-processing methods (samples EP, ES and EF). Proportion of classified (pink) vs. unclassified (light green) reads is shown by small pie-charts on top right corner of each bar