| Literature DB >> 30691470 |
Peter MacPherson1,2, McEwen Khundi3, Marriott Nliwasa4, Augustine T Choko3,5, Vincent K Phiri3, Emily L Webb6, Peter J Dodd7, Ted Cohen8, Rebecca Harris3,5, Elizabeth L Corbett3,9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A sizeable fraction of tuberculosis (TB) cases go undiagnosed. By analysing data from enhanced demographic, microbiological and geospatial surveillance of TB registrations, we aimed to identify modifiable predictors of inequitable access to diagnosis and care.Entities:
Keywords: Access to care; Bayesian regression analysis; Epidemiology; Gender; HIV; Inequality; Poverty; Spatial analysis; Surveillance; Tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30691470 PMCID: PMC6350280 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-019-1260-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med ISSN: 1741-7015 Impact factor: 8.775
Fig. 1Health Surveillance Assistant boundaries and populations 2015, Blantyre, Malawi. Population counts from study census conducted from October to December 2015. Boundaries are community health worker catchment areas, recorded by circumferential walks recording global positioning satellite coordinates by community health worker study team during October to December 2015. Black triangles are TB registration clinics. White areas in the centre of the map are mountainous areas or business districts with few residents that were not enumerated in the census or mapped by CHWs. The black triangle in the far north of map is a health centre with a TB registration clinic located outside of Blantyre District that may be used by Blantyre residents; to increase accuracy of case notification rates, we captured TB registrations at this clinic
Baseline characteristics of TB cases recorded in enhanced surveillance system in Blantyre
| CHW resident ( | Non-CHW resident ( | Total ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Year | |||
| 2015 | 994 (26.7%) | 666 (28.3%) | 1660 (27.3%) |
| 2016 | 1314 (35.3%) | 886 (37.6%) | 2200 (36.2%) |
| 2017 | 1415 (38.0%) | 802 (34.1%) | 2217 (36.5%) |
| Sex | |||
| Female | 1358 (36.5%) | 992 (42.1%) | 2350 (38.7%) |
| Male | 2365 (63.5%) | 1362 (57.9%) | 3727 (61.3%) |
| Age (mean, sd) | 35.0 (13.5) | 36.1 (16.0) | 35.4 (14.5) |
| TB classification | |||
| Missing | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Extrapulmonary TB | 1395 (37.5%) | 1052 (44.7%) | 2447 (40.3%) |
| Pulmonary TB | 2327 (62.5%) | 1302 (55.3%) | 3629 (59.7%) |
| Clinic registration sputum smear status | |||
| Missing/not done | 2087 | 1437 | 3524 |
| Smear negative | 618 (37.8%) | 399 (43.5%) | 1017 (39.8%) |
| Smear positive | 1018 (62.2%) | 518 (56.5%) | 1536 (60.2%) |
| HIV status | |||
| Missing | 99 | 63 | 162 |
| HIV negative | 1146 (31.6%) | 805 (35.1%) | 1951 (33.0%) |
| HIV positive | 2478 (68.4%) | 1486 (64.9%) | 3964 (67.0%) |
| Laboratory sputum smear status | |||
| Not done/lab issue | 911 | 698 | 1609 |
| Scanty positive | 18 (0.6%) | 5 (0.3%) | 23 (0.5%) |
| Smear negative | 1524 (54.2%) | 1000 (60.4%) | 2524 (56.5%) |
| Smear positive | 1270 (45.2%) | 651 (39.3%) | 1921 (43.0%) |
| Laboratory sputum TB culture status | |||
| Not done/lab issue | 1013 | 758 | 1771 |
| Culture negative | 1113 (41.1%) | 808 (50.6%) | 1921 (44.6%) |
| Culture positive | 1597 (58.9%) | 788 (49.4%) | 2385 (55.4%) |
| Laboratory TB species | |||
| Not done/lab issue | 2230 | 1625 | 3855 |
| | 1493 (100.0%) | 729 (100.0%) | 2222 (100.0%) |
| Microbiologically confirmed TB | |||
| Microbiologically confirmed TB | 1700 (45.7%) | 845 (35.9%) | 2545 (41.9%) |
| Not microbiologically confirmed TB | 2023 (54.3%) | 1509 (64.1%) | 3532 (58.1%) |
CHW community health worker
Fig. 2Annual Health Surveillance Assistant TB case notification rates, Blantyre, Malawi: 2015–2017. a All TB cases. b Microbiologically confirmed TB cases. Case notification rates per 100,000 population per year. Boundaries are community health worker catchment areas. Black triangles are TB registration clinics. White areas in the centre of the map are mountainous areas or business districts with few residents that were not enumerated in the census. The black triangle in the far north of the map is a health centre with a TB registration clinic located outside of Blantyre District that may be used by Blantyre residents; to increase accuracy of case notification rates, we captured TB registrations at this clinic
Posterior distributions of population-level covariates in a Bayesian spatial model for predicting tuberculosis case notification rates in Blantyre, Malawi: 2015–2017
| Adjusted relative rate | Lower 95% credible interval | Upper 95% credible interval | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analysis 1: all TB cases | |||
| Mean number of people per household | 1.00 | 0.78 | 1.27 |
| Log10 population density (people/km2) | 0.90 | 0.70 | 1.16 |
| Log10 distance to nearest TB clinic (m) | 0.60 | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Mean proportion of population living in poverty | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| Adult male-to-female ratio | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.72 |
| Proportion of population aged ≥15 years | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.02 |
| Sputum smear positive to negative ratio | 0.79 | 0.65 | 0.97 |
| Analysis 2: microbiologically confirmed TB cases | |||
| Mean number of people per household | 0.93 | 0.70 | 1.24 |
| Log10 population density (people/km2) | 0.95 | 0.70 | 1.29 |
| Log10 distance to nearest TB clinic (m) | 0.55 | 0.36 | 0.84 |
| Mean proportion of population living in poverty | 0.97 | 0.95 | 0.98 |
| Adult male-to-female ratio | 0.24 | 0.08 | 0.74 |
| Proportion of population aged ≥ 15 years | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.02 |
| Sputum smear positive to negative ratio | 1.18 | 0.95 | 1.48 |
Estimated by fitting a Bayesian spatial regression model with Poisson response, a k nearest-neighbours conditional spatial autocorrelation prior (with k = 6 for analysis 1 and k = 4 for analysis 2), with linear terms fitted for community health worker catchment area log10 population density, adult M:F ratio, mean number of people per household, log10 Cartesian distance from geographical centroid to the nearest TB clinic, percentage of population aged 15 years or older, mean percentage living on less than US $2 per day, offset term for log10 population size, and with weakly informative prior on the population-level effects intercept (Gaussian: mean = 0, sd = 10), and predictor intercept (Gaussian, mean = 0, sd = 10)
Fig. 3Marginal effects of covariates on TB case notification rates, Blantyre, 2015–2017. Red: analysis 1 (all TB); blue: analysis 2 (microbiologically confirmed TB). Estimated by fitting a Bayesian spatial regression model with Poisson response, a k nearest-neighbours conditional spatial autocorrelation prior (with k = 6 for analysis 1 and k = 4 for analysis 2), with linear terms fitted for community health worker catchment area log10 population density, adult M:F ratio, mean number of people per household, log10 Cartesian distance from geographical centroid to the nearest TB clinic, percentage of population aged 15 years or older, mean percentage living on less than US $2 per day, offset term for log10 population size, and with weakly informative prior on the population-level effects intercept (Gaussian: mean = 0, sd = 10), and predictor intercept (Gaussian, mean = 0, sd = 10). Lines are medians, estimated from 100 draws from posterior samples. Shaded areas are 95% credible intervals. Each marginal distribution estimated by holding all other variables constant at their median