| Literature DB >> 30691453 |
Natalia Siwinska1, Marcin Michalek2, Agnieszka Zak2, Malwina Slowikowska2, Agnieszka Noszczyk-Nowak2, Artur Niedzwiedz2, Urszula Paslawska2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Precise understanding of the dimensions of the vascular lumina is essential for accurate interpretation of cardiac vessels imaging. To the authors' best knowledge, this is the first study focusing on the ultrasound measurement of the right coronary artery (RCA) in the horse. The aim of this study was to determine both the ultrasonographic range of the normal diameter and lumen area of the RCA in horses and the influence of gender, age and level of training on the RCA dimensions. An additional aim of the study was to assess intra- and inter-observer repeatability of the collected measurements.Entities:
Keywords: Arteries; Coronary vessel; Equine; Heart; Ultrasound
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30691453 PMCID: PMC6348654 DOI: 10.1186/s12917-019-1792-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Vet Res ISSN: 1746-6148 Impact factor: 2.741
Fig. 1Right parasternal long axis view in 2D ultrasound image of the RCA. The RCA is visible in the middle of the image (white arrow). The right atrium (RA) lies dorsal to the RCA, the right ventricular outflow track (RVOT) is visible lateroventrally to the RCA, the pulmonary artery (PA) is visible ventrally to the RCA while the right ventricle (RV) lies lateral to the RCA
Fig. 2(a) 2D ultrasound image portraying the RCA (right parasternal long axis view). (b) Imaging of the inner lumen RCA diameter using the inner to inner method. (c) Measuring the inner lumen area of the RCA using an ultrasound contour caliper
Fig. 3Ultrasound right parasternal long axis view of the RCA in systole (a) and diastole (b)
Mean values of the clinical examination and measurements of the heart and the right coronary artery using two-dimensional and M-mode ultrasonography in horses divided into three groups: group I – racing horses, group II – sport horses, group III – retired horses
| Group I ( | Group II ( | Group III ( | All ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 5.5 ± 1.6 *^ | 8.9 ± 2.6 # | 21.6 ± 3.2 | 12.9 ± 7.6 |
| Height (cm) | 156.6 ± 3.3 | 161.9 ± 15.7 | 163.4 ± 9.2 | 161.8 ± 10.7 |
| Body weight (kg) | 490 ± 61 | 536.8 ± 98.7 | 535.4 ± 76.8 | 523.3 ± 81.5 |
| HR (per min.) | 32.8 ± 4.5 *^ | 37.3 ± 2.9 | 38.0 ± 3.1 | 36.3 ± 4.1 |
| IVSd (mm) | 32.3 ± 5.1 | 31.6 ± 7.6 | 31.2 ± 5.7 | 31.6 ± 6.1 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 114.2 ± 9.5 | 113 ± 14.4 | 109.7 ± 14.4 | 112.2 ± 13 |
| LVFWd (mm) | 22.6 ± 2.8 *^ | 36.5 ± 3.8 | 26.1 ± 3.4 | 25.3 ± 3.7 |
| IVSs (mm) | 47.5 ± 4.7 | 46.6 ± 5.9 | 48.1 ± 7.3 | 47.5 ± 6.1 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 66. ± 7.6 | 61.2 ± 11 | 56.4 ± 11.3 | 60.9 ± 10.9 |
| LVFWs (mm) | 43.1 ± 3.6 | 42.1 ± 7.9 | 42 ± 5.9 | 42.4 ± 6 |
| FS (%) | 41.9 ± 3.8 ^ | 45.9 ± 6.8 | 48.8 ± 5.9 | 45.9 ± 6.4 |
| EF (%) | 77.4 ± 6.4 ^ | 75.1 ± 7.5 | 69.4 ± 4.5 | 74.1 ± 7 |
| LVM (g) | 3849.1 ± 483.2 | 3756.8 ± 1025.5 | 3601.3 ± 910.5 | 3721.9 ± 842.3 |
| RCA systole diameter (mm) | 13.6 ± 1.3 | 13.1 ± 1.5 | 12.8 ± 1.5 | 13.1 ± 1.5 |
| RCA diastole diameter (mm) | 11 ± 1.3 | 11.8 ± 1.4 | 11.5 ± 1.3 | 11.5 ± 1.3 |
| RCA systole area (cm2) | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | 1.3 ± 0.2 |
| RCA diastole area (cm2) | 1 ± 0.2 ^ | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
*statistically significant differences p < 0.05 between group I and II; ^ statistically significant differences p < 0.05 between group I and III; # statistically significant differences p < 0.05 between group II and III
The influence of sex on RCA values and the correlation between age, body weight, height, heart dimensions, left ventricle mass and right coronary artery measurements. The correlation coefficient (r) and statistical significance (p)
| Systole | Diastole | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCA diameter | RCA area | RCA diameter | RCA area | |||||
| Parameter | r | p | r | p | r | p | r | p |
| Gender | – | 0.21 | – | 0.72 | – | 0.94 | – | 0.62 |
| HR | 0.248 | 0.144 | 0.041 | 0.814 | −0.04 | 0.819 | 0.02 | 0.908 |
| Body weight | 0.39* | 0.019 | 0.389* | 0.019 | 0.448* | 0.006 | 0.174 | 0.31 |
| Height | 0.37* | 0.026 | 0.455* | 0.005 | 0.415* | 0.012 | 0.226 | 0.186 |
| Age | −0.068 | 0.695 | 0.317 | 0.06 | 0.18 | 0.294 | −0.47* | 0.004 |
| IVSd | 0.27 | 0.117 | 0.34* | 0.046 | 0.23 | 0.184 | −0.02 | 0.909 |
| LVIDd | 0.18 | 0.301 | 0.25 | 0.148 | 0.14 | 0.422 | −0.12 | 0.492 |
| LVFWd | 0.04 | 0.82 | 0.01 | 0.954 | 0.22 | 0.204 | 0.39* | 0.034 |
| IVSs | 0.22 | 0.204 | 0.28 | 0.103 | 0.24 | 0.165 | 0.00 | 0.99 |
| LVIDs | 0.18 | 0.301 | 0.14 | 0.422 | 0.04 | 0.82 | −0.13 | 0.457 |
| LVFWs | 0.2 | 0.249 | −0.01 | 0.954 | 0.12 | 0.492 | −0.04 | 0.82 |
| FS | −0.13 | 0.457 | −0.04 | 0.82 | 0.05 | 0.775 | 0.1 | 0.568 |
| EF | −0.14 | 0.422 | −0.05 | 0.775 | 0.05 | 0.775 | 0.13 | 0.457 |
| LVM | 0.21 | 0.226 | 0.21 | 0.226 | 0.13 | 0.457 | −0.12 | 0.492 |
*correlation present at a p-value < 0.05
Intra- and inter-observer measurements of the mean values of the right coronary artery obtained from racehorses (n = 10), comparison of the mean values and an analysis of statistically significant differences (p-value) as well as the calculation of the coefficient of variation (CV)
| Interobserver | Intraobserver | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCA | Mean ± SD I | CV (%) | Mean ± SD II | CV (%) | p-value | Mean ± SD I | CV (%) | Mean ± SD II | CV (%) | |
| Diameter systole (mm) | 13.65 ± 1.27 | 9.29 | 13.7 ± 1.26 | 9.18 | 0.688 | 13.7 ± 1.26 | 9.18 | 13.47 ± 1.26 | 9.38 | 0.199 |
| Diameter diastole (mm) | 10.98 ± 1.27 | 11.57 | 11.25 ± 1.37 | 12.15 | 0.202 | 11.25 ± 1.37 | 12.15 | 11.48 ± 1.02 | 8.89 | 0.579 |
| Area systole (cm2) | 1.28 ± 0.2 | 15.23 | 1.34 ± 0.19 | 14.18 | 0.042 | 1.34 ± 0.19 | 14.18 | 1.27 ± 0.18 | 13.78 | 0.232 |
| Area diastole (cm2) | 0.97 ± 0.16 | 16.79 | 0.98 ± 0.17 | 16.99 | 0.591 | 0.98 ± 0.17 | 16.99 | 1.0 ± 0.12 | 12.44 | 0.611 |
Fig. 4Bland-Altman plots showing the coefficient repeatability of RCA measurements in racehorses obtained by one observer using two ultrasound machines (method A and method B). a – RCA diameter in systole; b – RCA diameter in diastole; c – RCA area in systole; d – RCA area in diastole
Fig. 5Bland-Altman plots showing the agreement between of RCA measurements in racehorses obtained by two observer using the same ultrasound machines (method A and method B). a – RCA diameter in systole; b – RCA diameter in diastole; c – RCA area in systole; d – RCA area in diastole