BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] has proven to be effective for optimising anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Nevertheless, the majority of data refer to infliximab and reactive testing or association studies. We aimed to compare the long-term outcome of patients with IBD who received at least one proactive TDM of adalimumab, with standard of care, defined as empirical dose escalation and/or reactive TDM. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients on maintenance adalimumab therapy from June 2006 to December 2015 were eligible. We analysed time to treatment failure from start of adalimumab until the end of follow-up [July 2016]. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation for secondary loss of response or serious adverse event or need for IBD-related surgery. Serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies to adalimumab were measured using the Prometheus homogeneous mobility shift assay. RESULTS: A total of 382 patients with IBD [Crohn's disease, n = 311, 81%] were included and received either at least one proactive TDM [n = 53] or standard of care [empirical dose escalation, n = 279; reactive TDM, n = 50]. Patients were followed for a median of 3.1 years [interquartile range, 1.4-4.8 years]. Multiple Cox regression analyses showed that at least one proactive TDM was independently associated with a reduced risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-0.9; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study reflecting real-life clinical practice provides the first evidence that proactive TDM of adalimumab may be associated with a lower risk of treatment failure compared with standard of care in patients with IBD.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Therapeutic drug monitoring [TDM] has proven to be effective for optimising anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]. Nevertheless, the majority of data refer to infliximab and reactive testing or association studies. We aimed to compare the long-term outcome of patients with IBD who received at least one proactive TDM of adalimumab, with standard of care, defined as empirical dose escalation and/or reactive TDM. METHODS: This was a multicentre retrospective cohort study. Patients on maintenance adalimumab therapy from June 2006 to December 2015 were eligible. We analysed time to treatment failure from start of adalimumab until the end of follow-up [July 2016]. Treatment failure was defined as drug discontinuation for secondary loss of response or serious adverse event or need for IBD-related surgery. Serum adalimumab concentrations and antibodies to adalimumab were measured using the Prometheus homogeneous mobility shift assay. RESULTS: A total of 382 patients with IBD [Crohn's disease, n = 311, 81%] were included and received either at least one proactive TDM [n = 53] or standard of care [empirical dose escalation, n = 279; reactive TDM, n = 50]. Patients were followed for a median of 3.1 years [interquartile range, 1.4-4.8 years]. Multiple Cox regression analyses showed that at least one proactive TDM was independently associated with a reduced risk for treatment failure (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.4; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.2-0.9; p = 0.022). CONCLUSIONS: This multicentre, retrospective cohort study reflecting real-life clinical practice provides the first evidence that proactive TDM of adalimumab may be associated with a lower risk of treatment failure compared with standard of care in patients with IBD.
Authors: Andres J Yarur; Anjali Jain; Scott I Hauenstein; Maria A Quintero; Jamie S Barkin; Amar R Deshpande; Daniel A Sussman; Sharat Singh; Maria T Abreu Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2016-02 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Karen A Chachu; Ravy K Vajravelu; Byron P Vaughn; Josephine Ni; Mark T Osterman; Adam S Cheifetz Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2017-03-30 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Omoniyi J Adedokun; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Paul Rutgeerts; Zhenhua Xu; Colleen W Marano; Jewel Johanns; Honghui Zhou; Hugh M Davis; Freddy Cornillie; Walter Reinisch Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Mark T Osterman; Kevin Haynes; Elizabeth Delzell; Jie Zhang; Meenakshi Bewtra; Colleen Brensinger; Lang Chen; Fenlong Xie; Jeffrey R Curtis; James D Lewis Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2013-06-28 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Byron P Vaughn; Manuel Martinez-Vazquez; Vilas R Patwardhan; Alan C Moss; William J Sandborn; Adam S Cheifetz Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Bram Verstockt; Gitte Moors; Sumin Bian; Thomas Van Stappen; Gert Van Assche; Séverine Vermeire; Ann Gils; Marc Ferrante Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2018-08-15 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Konstantinos Papamichael; Adam S Cheifetz; Gil Y Melmed; Peter M Irving; Niels Vande Casteele; Patricia L Kozuch; Laura E Raffals; Leonard Baidoo; Brian Bressler; Shane M Devlin; Jennifer Jones; Gilaad G Kaplan; Miles P Sparrow; Fernando S Velayos; Thomas Ullman; Corey A Siegel Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2019-03-27 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Jennifer Hellmann; Renee K Etter; Lee A Denson; Phillip Minar; Denise Hill; Dana M Dykes; Michael J Rosen Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2021-05-05
Authors: Arne Carlsen; Roald Omdal; Lars Karlsen; Jan Terje Kvaløy; Lars Aabakken; Øyvind Steinsbø; Nils Bolstad; David Warren; Knut Erik Aslaksen Lundin; Tore Grimstad Journal: JGH Open Date: 2019-10-06