BACKGROUND: Infliximab (IFX) is effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; however, the effect is often not durable. It is unknown if proactive therapeutic concentration monitoring (TCM) of IFX improves outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study examining the use of proactive TCM and titration of IFX to a target concentration for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission at a tertiary care center. The primary aim was to describe the clinical course of patients who had proactive TCM. A secondary analysis was done to assess if this strategy was superior to the standard of care. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified as having proactive TCM. Fifteen percent had an initial undetectable trough concentration. Twenty-five percent (12 of 48) of patients escalated IFX after the first proactive TCM while 15% (7 of 48) of patients de-escalated IFX therapy over the study period. A control group of 78 patients was identified. Patients who had proactive TCM had a greater probability of remaining on IFX than controls (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6; log rank test; P = 0.0006). The probability of remaining on IFX was greatest for patients who achieved a trough concentration >5 μg/mL (hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.1; P < 0.0001 versus trough <5 μg/mL). Fewer patients in the proactive TCM group stopped IFX (10% versus 31%, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot observational study, proactive TCM of IFX frequently identified patients with low or undetectable trough concentrations and resulted in a greater probability of remaining on IFX.
BACKGROUND:Infliximab (IFX) is effective in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease; however, the effect is often not durable. It is unknown if proactive therapeutic concentration monitoring (TCM) of IFX improves outcomes. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study examining the use of proactive TCM and titration of IFX to a target concentration for patients with inflammatory bowel disease in clinical remission at a tertiary care center. The primary aim was to describe the clinical course of patients who had proactive TCM. A secondary analysis was done to assess if this strategy was superior to the standard of care. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were identified as having proactive TCM. Fifteen percent had an initial undetectable trough concentration. Twenty-five percent (12 of 48) of patients escalated IFX after the first proactive TCM while 15% (7 of 48) of patients de-escalated IFX therapy over the study period. A control group of 78 patients was identified. Patients who had proactive TCM had a greater probability of remaining on IFX than controls (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-0.6; log rank test; P = 0.0006). The probability of remaining on IFX was greatest for patients who achieved a trough concentration >5 μg/mL (hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.1; P < 0.0001 versus trough <5 μg/mL). Fewer patients in the proactive TCM group stopped IFX (10% versus 31%, P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot observational study, proactive TCM of IFX frequently identified patients with low or undetectable trough concentrations and resulted in a greater probability of remaining on IFX.
Authors: Jean Frédéric Colombel; William J Sandborn; Walter Reinisch; Gerassimos J Mantzaris; Asher Kornbluth; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Simon Lichtiger; Geert D'Haens; Robert H Diamond; Delma L Broussard; Kezhen L Tang; C Janneke van der Woude; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Paul Rutgeerts; William J Sandborn; Brian G Feagan; Walter Reinisch; Allan Olson; Jewel Johanns; Suzanne Travers; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Stephen B Hanauer; Gary R Lichtenstein; Willem J S de Villiers; Daniel Present; Bruce E Sands; Jean Frédéric Colombel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Filip Baert; Maja Noman; Severine Vermeire; Gert Van Assche; Geert D' Haens; An Carbonez; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-02-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Stephen B Hanauer; Brian G Feagan; Gary R Lichtenstein; Lloyd F Mayer; S Schreiber; Jean Frederic Colombel; Daniel Rachmilewitz; Douglas C Wolf; Allan Olson; Weihang Bao; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Lancet Date: 2002-05-04 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jean-Frédéric Colombel; Brian G Feagan; William J Sandborn; Gert Van Assche; Anne M Robinson Journal: Inflamm Bowel Dis Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 5.325
Authors: Gert Van Assche; Geert D'Haens; Maja Noman; Séverine Vermeire; Martin Hiele; Katrien Asnong; Joris Arts; Andre D'Hoore; Freddy Penninckx; Paul Rutgeerts Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Casper Steenholdt; Mark A Ainsworth; Michael Tovey; Tobias W Klausen; Ole O Thomsen; Jørn Brynskov; Klaus Bendtzen Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2013-08 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Freddy Cornillie; Stephen B Hanauer; Robert H Diamond; Jianping Wang; Kezhen L Tang; Zhenhua Xu; Paul Rutgeerts; Séverine Vermeire Journal: Gut Date: 2014-01-28 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Diane R Mould; Richard N Upton; Jessica Wojciechowski; Becky L Phan; Stacy Tse; Marla C Dubinsky Journal: AAPS J Date: 2018-06-14 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Jessica Wojciechowski; Richard N Upton; Diane R Mould; Michael D Wiese; David J R Foster Journal: AAPS J Date: 2017-04-25 Impact factor: 4.009