Literature DB >> 30689056

Temporal variability of suspended solids in construction runoff and evaluation of time-paced sampling strategies.

Raja Umer Sajjad1,2, Ma Cristina Paule-Mercado1, Imran Salim1, Sheeraz Memon3, Chinzorig Sukhbaatar4, Chang-Hee Lee5.   

Abstract

The construction sites have been considered the type of land use with the highest pollution potential, especially due to the erosion of exposed soil surfaces. The runoff monitoring of the construction site was carried out since June 2011 through December 2015. Based on land use land cover (LULC) classification, the monitoring period was divided into active and post-construction phases. Total suspended solids (TSS) showed evident inter-phase variability in average annual event mean concentration (AAEMC) and wash-off pattern. We suggested that stringent runoff control measures should be adopted during active construction phase. Similarly, Personalized Computer Storm Water Management Model (PCSWMM) was applied to evaluate the performance of the time-paced discrete and composite sampling scheme in continuously changing LC scenario. It was found that even though the time-paced composite sampling scheme is more cost effective, it showed lower performance in EMC estimation when compared with the time-paced discrete sampling approach. The results also showed that the storm event monitored at a time discrete frequency of 5 min, 10 min, and 15 min, the maximum expected mean bias will be under the accepted level of 10% of the true EMC value. We concluded that construction phase-specific modifications in sampling scheme provides a view to generate near accurate estimates.

Keywords:  Land use; Mass emission; Modeling; Sampling design; Stormwater

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30689056     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-019-7195-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

1.  Assessment of efficient sampling designs for urban stormwater monitoring.

Authors:  Molly K Leecaster; Kenneth Schiff; Liesl L Tiefenthaler
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 11.236

2.  Sensitivity to experimental data of pollutant site mean concentration in stormwater runoff.

Authors:  M Mourad; J L Bertrand-Krajewski; G Chebbo
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.915

3.  Design of stormwater monitoring programs.

Authors:  Haejin Lee; Xavier Swamikannu; Dan Radulescu; Seung-jai Kim; Michael K Stenstrom
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-05-18       Impact factor: 11.236

4.  Unit soil loss rate from various construction sites during a storm.

Authors:  Marla C Maniquiz; Soyoung Lee; Eunju Lee; Dong-Soo Kong; Lee-Hyung Kim
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.915

5.  Accuracy of a stormwater monitoring program for urban landuses.

Authors:  Krish Madarang; Joo-Hyon Kang
Journal:  Water Environ Res       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.946

6.  Influence of land development on stormwater runoff from a mixed land use and land cover catchment.

Authors:  M A Paule-Mercado; B Y Lee; S A Memon; S R Umer; I Salim; C-H Lee
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2017-05-29       Impact factor: 7.963

7.  Monitoring and predicting the fecal indicator bacteria concentrations from agricultural, mixed land use and urban stormwater runoff.

Authors:  M A Paule-Mercado; J S Ventura; S A Memon; D Jahng; J-H Kang; C-H Lee
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 7.963

8.  Uncertainties in stormwater E. coli levels.

Authors:  D T McCarthy; A Deletic; V G Mitchell; T D Fletcher; C Diaper
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2007-11-17       Impact factor: 11.236

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.