BACKGROUND: Current noninvasive risk stratification methods offer limited prediction of arrhythmic events when selecting patients for ICD implantation. Our laboratory has recently developed a signal processing metric called Layered Symbolic Decomposition frequency (LSDf) that quantifies the percentage of hidden QRS wave frequency components in signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) recordings. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether LSDf can be predictive of ventricular arrhythmia or death in an ICD patient cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two ICD patients were recruited from 2008 to 2009. These were followed for a mean of 8.5 ± 0.4 years for the primary outcome of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmia (VT/VF) or death. Thirty-four subjects met the primary outcome. LSDf was significantly lower, and 12-lead QRS duration was significantly greater in patients meeting the primary outcome (12.14 ± 3.97% vs. 16.45 ± 3.73%; p = 0.001) and (111.59 ± 14.96 ms vs. 97.69 ± 13.51 ms; p = 0.012) respectively. A 13.25% LSDf threshold (0.74 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity) was selected based on an ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted; patients above the 13.25% threshold demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes (log-rank p < 0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, the LSDf threshold (13.25%) was compared to LVEF (28.5%), 12-lead QRSd (100 ms), age, % male sex, NYHA classification, and antiarrhythmic usage. LSDf was a predictor of the primary outcome (p = 0.005) and an independent predictor for solely ventricular arrhythmia (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Layered Symbolic Decomposition frequency analysis in SAECG recordings may be a viable predictor of negative ICD survival outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Current noninvasive risk stratification methods offer limited prediction of arrhythmic events when selecting patients for ICD implantation. Our laboratory has recently developed a signal processing metric called Layered Symbolic Decomposition frequency (LSDf) that quantifies the percentage of hidden QRS wave frequency components in signal-averaged ECG (SAECG) recordings. The purpose of this pilot study was to determine whether LSDf can be predictive of ventricular arrhythmia or death in an ICDpatient cohort. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-two ICDpatients were recruited from 2008 to 2009. These were followed for a mean of 8.5 ± 0.4 years for the primary outcome of first appropriately treated ventricular arrhythmia (VT/VF) or death. Thirty-four subjects met the primary outcome. LSDf was significantly lower, and 12-lead QRS duration was significantly greater in patients meeting the primary outcome (12.14 ± 3.97% vs. 16.45 ± 3.73%; p = 0.001) and (111.59 ± 14.96 ms vs. 97.69 ± 13.51 ms; p = 0.012) respectively. A 13.25% LSDf threshold (0.74 sensitivity and 0.85 specificity) was selected based on an ROC curve. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted; patients above the 13.25% threshold demonstrated significantly better survival outcomes (log-rank p < 0.001). In Cox multivariate regression analysis, the LSDf threshold (13.25%) was compared to LVEF (28.5%), 12-lead QRSd (100 ms), age, % male sex, NYHA classification, and antiarrhythmic usage. LSDf was a predictor of the primary outcome (p = 0.005) and an independent predictor for solely ventricular arrhythmia (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Layered Symbolic Decomposition frequency analysis in SAECG recordings may be a viable predictor of negative ICD survival outcomes.
Authors: Leslie A Saxon; David L Hayes; F Roosevelt Gilliam; Paul A Heidenreich; John Day; Milan Seth; Timothy E Meyer; Paul W Jones; John P Boehmer Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-11-22 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Moloy Das; Adrian M Suszko; Sachin Nayyar; Karthik Viswanathan; Danna A Spears; George Tomlinson; Arnold Pinter; Eugene Crystal; Rupin Dalvi; Sridhar Krishnan; Vijay S Chauhan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2017-07
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Emelia J Benjamin; Alan S Go; Donna K Arnett; Michael J Blaha; Mary Cushman; Sarah de Ferranti; Jean-Pierre Després; Heather J Fullerton; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Suzanne E Judd; Brett M Kissela; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; Simin Liu; Rachel H Mackey; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Paul Muntner; Michael E Mussolino; Khurram Nasir; Robert W Neumar; Graham Nichol; Latha Palaniappan; Dilip K Pandey; Mathew J Reeves; Carlos J Rodriguez; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Amytis Towfighi; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Joshua Z Willey; Daniel Woo; Robert W Yeh; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2014-12-17 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Ilan Goldenberg; John Gillespie; Arthur J Moss; W Jackson Hall; Helmut Klein; Scott McNitt; Mary W Brown; Iwona Cygankiewicz; Wojciech Zareba Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Yee Guan Yap; Trinh Duong; J Martin Bland; Marek Malik; Christian Torp-Pedersen; Lars Køber; Mark M Gallagher; A John Camm Journal: Heart Date: 2007-01-19 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: Mithilesh K Das; Hussam Suradi; Waddah Maskoun; Mark A Michael; Changyu Shen; Jonathan Peng; Gopi Dandamudi; Jo Mahenthiran Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2008-07-14