Literature DB >> 30687941

Mapping bacterial biofilms on recovered orthopaedic implants by a novel agar candle dip method.

James P Moley1, Mary S McGrath1, Jeffrey F Granger2, Anne C Sullivan2, Paul Stoodley1,2,3, Devendra H Dusane1.   

Abstract

While the detrimental effects of periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are well known, the process of biofilm formation on orthopaedic hardware is unclear. Previous work has shown that encasement of explant hardware in agar can aid in identifying biofilms. This study tested the utility of agar 'candle dip' method in detecting and mapping the location of biofilm on infected orthopedic components. Explant components from 15 patients were rinsed, briefly submerged in agar to create a surface coating, and incubated. Larger components were coated by pipetting agar over them. After incubation, colony outgrowth on the component surface was documented (candle dip status). Data were compared with clinical laboratory results (clinical culture status) and the PJI diagnosis using Musculoskeletal Infection Society criteria (MSIS status). All six patients classified as MSIS and clinical culture positive were also positive with the candle dip technique. Of the nine candle dip negative cases, four were positive and five were negative for both MSIS and clinical culture status. Candle dip may be negative in few cases due to the residual antibiotic eluting from the spacers, limiting the growth of bacterial biofilms on the components. The candle dip method shows promise for biofilm mapping but requires additional testing to evaluate the clinical diagnostic potential.
© 2019 APMIS. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biofilm; bacteria; implant; mapping; orthopaedic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30687941      PMCID: PMC6372321          DOI: 10.1111/apm.12923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  APMIS        ISSN: 0903-4641            Impact factor:   3.205


  10 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms in orthopedic infections: a review of laboratory methods.

Authors:  Alex C Dibartola; Matthew C Swearingen; Jeffrey F Granger; Paul Stoodley; Devendra H Dusane
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.205

2.  Definition of periprosthetic joint infection.

Authors:  Javad Parvizi; Thorsten Gehrke
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-03-21       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 3.  Treating periprosthetic joint infections as biofilms: key diagnosis and management strategies.

Authors:  Alice Tzeng; Tony H Tzeng; Sonia Vasdev; Kyle Korth; Travis Healey; Javad Parvizi; Khaled J Saleh
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.803

4.  16S rRNA analysis provides evidence of biofilms on all components of three infected periprosthetic knees including permanent braided suture.

Authors:  Matthew C Swearingen; Alex C DiBartola; Devendra Dusane; Jeffrey Granger; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2016-08-21       Impact factor: 3.166

5.  Periprosthetic joint infection increases the risk of one-year mortality.

Authors:  Benjamin Zmistowski; Joseph A Karam; Joel B Durinka; David S Casper; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Usefulness of sonication for diagnosing infection in explanted orthopaedic implants.

Authors:  R Erivan; G Villatte; G Eymond; A Mulliez; S Descamps; S Boisgard
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 2.256

7.  Economic burden of periprosthetic joint infection in the United States.

Authors:  Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Heather Watson; Jordana K Schmier; Javad Parvizi
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Characterization of a mixed MRSA/MRSE biofilm in an explanted total ankle arthroplasty.

Authors:  Paul Stoodley; Stephen F Conti; Patrick J DeMeo; Laura Nistico; Rachael Melton-Kreft; Sandra Johnson; Ali Darabi; Garth D Ehrlich; J William Costerton; Sandeep Kathju
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  2011-03-22

9.  Antibiotic loaded calcium sulfate bead and pulse lavage eradicates biofilms on metal implant materials in vitro.

Authors:  Cory S Knecht; James P Moley; Mary S McGrath; Jeffrey F Granger; Paul Stoodley; Devendra H Dusane
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.494

Review 10.  Biofilms in periprosthetic orthopedic infections.

Authors:  Stephen J McConoughey; Rob Howlin; Jeff F Granger; Maurice M Manring; Jason H Calhoun; Mark Shirtliff; Sandeep Kathju; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.165

  10 in total
  2 in total

1.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm killing beyond the spacer by antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jacob R Brooks; Devendra H Dusane; Kelly Moore; Tripti Gupta; Craig Delury; Sean S Aiken; Phillip A Laycock; Anne C Sullivan; Jeffrey F Granger; Matthew V Dipane; Edward J McPherson; Paul Stoodley
Journal:  J Bone Jt Infect       Date:  2021-03-23

2.  Implant surface culture may be a useful adjunct to standard tissue sampling culture for identification of pathogens accounting for fracture-device-related infection: a within-person randomized agreement study of 42 patients.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Yan-Jun Hu; Qing-Rong Lin; Peng Chen; Hao-Yang Wan; Si-Ying He; Paul Stoodley; Bin Yu
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 3.925

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.