Jacob R Brooks1, Devendra H Dusane1, Kelly Moore1, Tripti Gupta1, Craig Delury2, Sean S Aiken2, Phillip A Laycock2, Anne C Sullivan3, Jeffrey F Granger3, Matthew V Dipane4, Edward J McPherson4, Paul Stoodley1,3,5. 1. Department of Microbial Infection and Immunity, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 2. Biocomposites Ltd., Keele Science Park, Keele, Staffordshire, ST5 5NL, UK. 3. Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University, Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA. 4. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Santa Monica, California, USA. 5. National Centre for Advanced Tribology at Southampton (nCATS), National Biofilm Innovation Centre (NBIC), Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Abstract
Introduction: Bacterial biofilms are an important virulence factor in chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and other orthopedic infection since they are highly tolerant to antibiotics and host immunity. Antibiotics are mixed into carriers such as bone cement and calcium sulfate bone void fillers to achieve sustained high concentrations of antibiotics required to more effectively manage biofilm infections through local release. The effect of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (ALCS-B) in combination with PMMA bone cement spacers on the spread and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Xen41 (PA-Xen41) biofilm was investigated using a "large agar plate" model scaled for clinical relevance. Methods: Bioluminescent PA-Xen41 biofilms grown on discs of various orthopedic materials were placed within a large agar plate containing a PMMA full-size mock "spacer" unloaded or loaded with vancomycin and tobramycin, with or without ALCS-B. The amount of biofilm spread and log reduction on discs at varying distances from the spacer was assessed by bioluminescent imaging and viable cell counts. Results: For the unloaded spacer control, PA-Xen41 spread from the biofilm to cover the entire plate. The loaded spacer generated a 3 cm zone of inhibition and significantly reduced biofilm bacteria on the discs immediately adjacent to the spacer but low or zero reductions on those further away. The combination of ALCS-B and a loaded PMMA spacer greatly reduced bacterial spread and resulted in significantly greater biofilm reductions on discs at all distances from the spacer. Discussion: The addition of ALCS-B to an antibiotic-loaded spacer mimic increased the area of antibiotic coverage and efficacy against biofilm, suggesting that a combination of these depots may provide greater physical antibiotic coverage and more effective dead space management, particularly in zones where the spread of antibiotic is limited by diffusion (zones with little or no fluid motion). Copyright:
Introduction: Bacterial biofilms are an important virulence factor in chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) and other orthopedic infection since they are highly tolerant to antibiotics and host immunity. Antibiotics are mixed into carriers such as bone cement and calcium sulfate bone void fillers to achieve sustained high concentrations of antibiotics required to more effectively manage biofilm infections through local release. The effect of antibiotic diffusion from antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (ALCS-B) in combination with PMMA bone cement spacers on the spread and killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Xen41 (PA-Xen41) biofilm was investigated using a "large agar plate" model scaled for clinical relevance. Methods: Bioluminescent PA-Xen41 biofilms grown on discs of various orthopedic materials were placed within a large agar plate containing a PMMA full-size mock "spacer" unloaded or loaded with vancomycin and tobramycin, with or without ALCS-B. The amount of biofilm spread and log reduction on discs at varying distances from the spacer was assessed by bioluminescent imaging and viable cell counts. Results: For the unloaded spacer control, PA-Xen41 spread from the biofilm to cover the entire plate. The loaded spacer generated a 3 cm zone of inhibition and significantly reduced biofilm bacteria on the discs immediately adjacent to the spacer but low or zero reductions on those further away. The combination of ALCS-B and a loaded PMMA spacer greatly reduced bacterial spread and resulted in significantly greater biofilm reductions on discs at all distances from the spacer. Discussion: The addition of ALCS-B to an antibiotic-loaded spacer mimic increased the area of antibiotic coverage and efficacy against biofilm, suggesting that a combination of these depots may provide greater physical antibiotic coverage and more effective dead space management, particularly in zones where the spread of antibiotic is limited by diffusion (zones with little or no fluid motion). Copyright:
Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a complex problem in total joint
arthroplasty (TJA) and occurs in 2 %–2.4 % of all total hip and knee
replacement procedures
(Kurtz
et al., 2012; Rasouli et al., 2014). While infrequent, PJI has a dramatic
effect on the patient's health, often resulting in joint dysfunction,
morbidity, and mortality
(Vrgoc
et al., 2014; Boddapati et al., 2018; Zmistowski et al., 2013). The
financial burden placed on patients and the healthcare system is staggering
(Kurtz
et al., 2012; Kamath et al., 2015). A major complicating factor in treating
PJI is microbiota-produced biofilms
(Gbejuade et al., 2015; McConoughey
et al., 2014). Biofilms are pathogenic communities that adhere to living and
nonliving surfaces and exhibit greatly increased antibiotic tolerance and
resistance against host immunity. The establishment of biofilms is assisted
by the presence of foreign materials of orthopedic implant components, such
as various metals and polymers
(Zimmerli,
2014; Moley et al., 2019).Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative opportunistic nosocomial pathogen and is cultured up to
20 % of the time in chronic Gram-negative PJI
(McConoughey
et al., 2014; Zmistowski et al., 2011; Rodríguez-Pardo et al., 2014).
In previous in vitro studies, P. aeruginosa has shown the ability to display tolerance and resistance to antibiotics commonly used to treat PJIs
(Dusane et
al., 2019). Although the Gram-positive Staphylococci are the most commonly
isolated pathogens from PJI, the infecting organism (or organisms) may not
be cultured as much as up to 25 % of the time
(Kapadia
et al., 2016; Pulido et al., 2008; Choi et al., 2013) or treatment is
started before culture data are available. Thus, in treating PJI,
combinations of antibiotics are commonly used to provide broad-spectrum
coverage (Ciofu et al., 2017). Vancomycin
and/or aminoglycosides (most commonly gentamicin or tobramycin) can be mixed
into polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) bone cement and mineral-based absorbable bone fillers such as calcium sulfate dihydrate (CaSO HO) to be administered as spacers
(Hansen et al., 2014) and beads
(McPherson et al., 2013) in the
joint space and medullary canals. These depot forms have been shown to
release high concentrations of antibiotic required to more effectively
prevent or manage biofilms that cannot be achieved by systemic
administration (Mandell
et al., 2019). There is promising yet inconclusive clinical data suggesting that ALCS-B used as an adjuvant in revision arthroplasty result in more
favorable outcomes (Abosala and Ali,
2020). However, it is not known how ALCS-B used in combination with
antibiotic-loaded PMMA may impact the area of antimicrobial potency against biofilms, particularly in those areas such as dead zones where there is little fluid flow, and the spread of the antibiotic is limited by diffusion.Previous studies using in vitro biofilms of the bioluminescent P. aeruginosa Xen41 (PA-Xen41) showed that the number and spacing of ALCS-B were important in the rate and extent
of killing of an agar lawn biofilm
(Dusane et al.,
2019). Further, we have previously shown in a similar model that the
antibiotic loading concentration in ALCS-B did not significantly change the
effective area of antibiotic activity over the observed time frame, from
which we concluded that the area of antibiotic potency was limited primarily
by diffusion, not the loading potency
(Dusane et
al., 2017). While we expect that increasing the area of spread of antibiotic
depots will result in increased spatial coverage of antibiotic activity, we
wish to determine the spatial effect of adding ALCS-B to an antibiotic-loaded spacer mimic on the spread of bacteria from biofilm-colonized materials, as well as the killing efficacy of biofilm bacteria on those
materials in a scaled-up in vitro model. In the present study, we evaluate the effect of ALCS-B and antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers (ALBC-S) on containing both the spread and killing of P. aeruginosa biofilms using a “large agar plate”
model. We used P. aeruginosa Xen41 in part because of its strong bioluminescent signal, allowing for more sensitive and illustrative monitoring of the effect of
antibiotic diffusing from the PMMA or ALSC-B by an in vitro imaging system (IVIS).
Materials and methods
Bacterial growth
A bioluminescent derivative strain of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 (PA-Xen41; Xenogen Corp., USA)
was used. Stock culture was streaked onto 1.5 % tryptic soy agar (TSA;
Becton, Dickinson & Company, MD, USA) and incubated for 24 h. A single
colony was transferred aseptically to 15 mL of tryptic soy broth (TSB;
Becton, Dickinson & Company, MD, USA) and incubated overnight at
37 C, 5 % CO on a rotary shaker at 200 rpm. We used
PA-Xen41 for our studies because it gives off a very strong signal, allowing
for our long-term non-destructive monitoring of the spread of antibiotics on
activity and killing of the lawn biofilms, and as mentioned previously, P. aeruginosa is
a relevant Gram-negative PJI pathogen.
Formation of biofilms on circular discs
Overnight cultures were diluted to 0.1 % and used to inoculate sterile,
circular discs (BioSurface Technologies, MT, USA) of hydroxyapatite (HA),
ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE), 316L stainless steel
(SS-316), and titanium (Ti). The “as received” roughnesses measured by contact profilometry were 976, 3867, 224, and 300 nm, respectively.
The discs had a diameter of 9.5 mm and a thickness of 2 mm. Four milliliters of the diluted culture was added to four different wells of a six-well plate and
three discs of each material were aseptically submerged in the inoculum. The
plate was incubated at 37 C, 5 % CO for 72 h to
establish 3 d biofilms.
Preparation of antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads (ALCS-B)
ALCS-B were prepared using Stimulan® Rapid Cure
(Biocomposites, Ltd., Keele, UK) 10-cc mixing kits. Twenty grams of
CaSO powder was mixed with 1000 mg of vancomycin hydrochloride powder
(VAN; Tokyo Chemical Industry, Tokyo, Japan) and 240 mg of tobramycin
sulfate powder (TOB; VWR International, PA). Once
blended, 6 mL of sterile liquid included in the kit was added and the mixture stirred into a uniform paste for 30 s. The paste was pressed
into a flexible mold (Biocomposites, Ltd., Keele, UK) with bead sizes of 4.8 mm in diameter and allowed to set for 10–15 min at 20 C.
Although Xen41 is resistant to vancomycin
(Dusane et
al., 2017), we used a combination of vancomycin and tobramycin since the
combination of vancomycin with an aminoglycoside (tobramycin or gentamicin)
has been mixed in PMMA and ALCS-B clinically to provide broad-spectrum coverage (Anagnostakos, 2017; Hanssen
and Spangehl, 2004). Additionally, we wanted to be consistent with previous
experiments using ALCS-B
(McConoughey
et al., 2015, 2014; Dusane et al., 2017; Howlin et al., 2017) and avoid
changing the release characteristics and set time by changing the loading
formulation.
Preparation of antibiotic-loaded (LS) and unloaded (US) PMMA bone cement spacer mimics
PMMA bone cement spacer mimics were prepared using
Simplex™ P SpeedSet™
Radiopaque Bone Cement construction kits (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI), which are commonly used clinically. Antibiotic-loaded spacers were fabricated using 2 g VAN powder, 2 g TOB powder, and 40 g PMMA powder. Unloaded spacers were prepared with only
PMMA bone cement powder. Twenty milliliters of sterile methyl methacrylate monomer (liquid) was added to the powder mixture, stirred into a dough-like mass, formed into a “hockey puck-like” disc using a 7 cm
diameter circular mold (Silikomart Professional Silicone Baking Mold,
Cylinder 6 Cavities, Amazon, WA) and allowed to set for 30 min at 20 C.Side-view schematic showing the construction of the large plate agar model. This model allows for the spread of antibiotic released from
ALCS-B and an antibiotic-loaded spacer (ALBC-S) as it diffuses through the agar. Three discs of each material containing 3 d biofilms were placed at
distances of 1, 3, and 5 cm radiating linearly from the edge of the PMMA
spacer mimic. ALCS-B were only included in the LS ALCS-B antibiotic
condition.
Large plate model
Fifty milliliters of 1.5 % TSA was added to a 21 cm diameter glass pie baking dish sterilized with 70 % EtOH and allowed to solidify, followed by central
placement of a PMMA spacer followed by another 100 mL of molten agar. Once
set, three discs of each material (12 in total, each colonized with
pre-grown 3 d biofilms) were placed on top of the agar layer radiating
outwards (Fig. 1). For the experiments with ALCS-B, a 10-cc pack of beads
was sprinkled somewhat randomly around the spacer with greater bead density
closer to the spacer mimic. While sprinkling the ALCS-B without careful
placement in a specified pattern may cause difficulty with interpretation,
we wished to more closely mimic how they might be applied clinically, where
they might not be spread evenly. Also, small diameter antibiotic depots such
as ALCS-B can fill smaller void spaces than the larger PMMA beads and thus
can be distributed more thoroughly.After adding the beads, another 100 mL of cooled ( 50 C)
liquid agar was poured to cover the discs and beads and the plate covered
with plastic film wrap for incubation and imaging. The antibiotic-loaded spacer and biofilm-colonized discs were embedded within layers of agar to allow for the diffusion of antibiotic and bacteria from all surfaces. These
agar “layers” merged to form one cohesive block (Fig. 1). The following
conditions were tested: (1) unloaded PMMA spacer only (US), (2) a VANTOB
antibiotic-loaded spacer only (LS), and (3) a VANTOB-loaded spacer with a 10-cc pack of ALCS-B (LS ALCS-B). The plates were incubated at
37 C, 5 % CO for 5 d and imaged daily. Previously we
demonstrated that the spreads of tobramycin as a function of time () over a 4 d period to achieve killing of the Xen41 agar lawn biofilms from PMMA
and ALCS beads were 4.2 t mm and 3.6 t mm respectively, with the loading concentration making little difference, suggesting the
transport through the agar was limited by diffusion
(Dusane et
al., 2017).
Bioluminescent imaging (BLI)
BLI was executed using an in vitro imaging system (IVIS 100, Xenogen, MA) that semi-quantitatively measures the relative amount of metabolically active
biofilm. Each quadrant of the large plate model was individually imaged and
then stitched together (Photoshop, Adobe, CA) to show the whole plate. Red
represented the highest metabolic activity and blue or black low or no
metabolic activity. White-light (plain) images of each plate were captured with a cellphone.
Viable cell counting
Colony-forming unit (CFU) counts were performed on mimicked sets of discs, one set on the 3 d biofilms and one set after incubation in the large
plate model. CFUs were performed as previously described
(Moley et al., 2018).
These discs were rinsed and then vortexed with 10 mL of phosphate-buffered
saline (PBS; Dulbecco's, Gibco, Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) in 15 mL
Falcon tubes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA); 10 of each dilution of a 10-fold dilution series was spotted onto TSA. The plates were incubated at
37 C, 5 % CO for 24 h and colonies enumerated to determine CFU per area of disc (CFU/cm). CFU counts after the
incubation were done by first extracting the embedded discs as an “agar
plug” in which a 1.35 cm diameter circular glass tube was used to punch out the coupons.
Statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in triplicate. The effect of the different
conditions on the log reduction of biofilm at different proximities from the
spacer was compared by first performing a log transformation and the
geometric means used to calculate log reductions. Our CFU detection limit
was 3.5 log CFU/cm. Discs that displayed no CFU growth are
shown as equal to or less than this limit. The log reductions of the LS and LS ALCS-B antibiotic conditions were compared by a Student's test assuming unequal variances, where was considered statistically
significant. Data were analyzed and graphed using Excel software (version 2102, Microsoft 365).
Results
Prevention of biofilm spread by LS and ALCS-B
The bioluminescence of P. aeruginosa Xen41 allowed biofilm on the discs and the spread of
bacteria from these discs to be easily visualized while remaining in situ in the large plate model over the 5 d (Fig. 2a). The unloaded spacer (US)
condition of the large plate, containing no antibiotic, showed substantial
bacterial spread from the discs and was confirmed by white-light imaging, showing P. aeruginosa coverage throughout the large plate (Fig. 2b).IVIS (a) and white-light (b) images tracking the suppression of P. aeruginosa Xen41 biofilm spread from biofilm-colonized discs of four different
orthopedic materials for three different antibiotic conditions. Plates were
imaged every 24 h for 5 d. At the periphery of all plates, there is a
loss of bioluminescence over time, even in the non-antibiotic control. This is likely due to nutrient depletion and a loss of metabolic activity in this region.The antibiotic-loaded spacer (LS) alone exhibited anti-bacterial activity generating a zone of inhibition (ZOI) of approximately 2.4–3.0 cm from the
edge of the spacer (Fig. 2a). After 3 d a small number of colonies were observed growing a few millimeters within the edge ZOI (Fig. 2a). These were possibly antibiotic tolerant phenotypes and
have been observed previously
(Dusane et al.,
2019).The LS ALCS-B condition, which contained the addition of VANTOBALCS-B,
prevented the formation of antibiotic-tolerant phenotypes and suppressed the spreading of PA-Xen41 to sparse areas near the peripheral edge of the plate,
where the bead density was lowest, or in areas where beads were absent (Fig. 2).Quantification of viable bacteria (by CFU) on discs containing P. aeruginosa Xen41
3 d biofilm. Counts are reported in terms of log CFUs per surface area of the disc (in cm).
Region of biofilm killing by viable cell counts
After 3 d of inoculation, the amount of PA-Xen41 biofilm grown on
various discs was quantified by cell counting (CFU). This analysis was
completed to confirm biofilm growth on each type of disc before
implementation into the large plate model. All four disc materials displayed
sizeable biofilm growth of CFU/cm,
although there was no statistically significant difference in growth between
any of the four materials (). UHMWPE discs garnered the
largest number of bacteria with a count of 10.6 log CFU/cm
(Fig. 3), followed by HA, SS-316, and Ti, indicating a weak trend with
increasing roughness.Log reduction of P. aeruginosa Xen41 biofilms, after being grown for 3 d
in TSB media and then introduced into the large plate model against one of
three antibiotic conditions for 5 d. CFU counts of SS-316 (a), Ti (b), HA (c), and UHMWPE (d) from the biofilm-colonized discs, varying in distance from the edge of the PMMA spacer, were compared to those on an unloaded
spacer (US) control. denotes discs eradicated of biofilm bacteria to
below the CFU detection limit (3.54 log CFU/cm) and indicates
that the reduction could be greater than or equal to the value listed in the
graph. * represents statistically significant () differences
in log reductions between LS and LS ALCS-B antibiotic conditions.The LS alone reduced biofilm concentrations on the closest discs (1 cm from
the spacer's edge), with bacterial reduction ranging from 1.5 to 5.5 log CFU/cm depending on the material type (Fig. 4a–d). For
the more distant discs (3 and 5 cm from the spacer), reduction of bacteria
drastically decreased to a range of no reduction to 3.8
log CFU/cm. The addition of loaded beads (LS ALCS-B) promoted
the log reduction of the more distant discs to levels of 2.5 to 6.6
log CFU/cm, depending on the material. Furthermore, the
addition of ALCS-B eradicated biofilm to below detection limits (3.5
log CFU/cm) on SS-316 and Ti discs 5 cm from the spacer (Fig. 4a, b), a statistically significant reduction compared to the LS alone. In UHMWPE (Fig. 4d), the LS ALCS-B condition produced
significantly more () biofilm reduction in discs at every
distance. The Ti discs 3 and 5 cm from the edge of the spacer (Fig. 4b), the
HA disc 3 cm from the spacer (Fig. 4c), and the SS-316 disc 5 cm from the
spacer (Fig. 4a) also showed statistically significant biofilm killing in
the LS ALCS-B condition compared to the LS alone ().
Discussion
Here we show in our diffusion-based model that ALCS-B significantly reduced
() P. aeruginosa Xen41 biofilm growth on materials common to orthopedic
implants in vitro while also increasing the zone of antimicrobial potency beyond that achieved by an antibiotic-loaded PMMA spacer alone. Furthermore, our work demonstrates how such beads sprinkled around the spacer may more
effectively manage dead space and control the spread of bacteria from such
implant surfaces, particularly in those locations where the spread of
released antibiotics is limited by diffusion, as would be expected in the
periprosthetic tissue, areas of a joint space, or the medullary canal. In a
well-mixed system, the specific distribution of antibiotic depots will be
less important since the antibiotics will be well distributed by the mixing,
but when the rate of spread of antibiotics is limited by diffusion, then the
spatial distribution becomes significant.The observed spread of bacteria from the discs over the surrounding agar
appears similar to how biofilm is thought to spread throughout a joint space
infection (Zimmerli and Sendi, 2017; Jenkins et
al., 2010). Antibiotics loaded into PMMA cement in the form of both beads
and spacers have been successfully used to treat PJI for many years
(Hanssen and Spangehl, 2004). However, there
are limitations to the use of PMMA alone with respect to the release of
local antibiotics at a surgical site. Once an antibiotic has eluted to below
MIC levels, the PMMA itself becomes a surface for bacterial biofilm
formation
(Ma et
al., 2018; Stoodley et al., 2008). Further, even though retrieved PMMA
spacers are still shown to elute antibiotics and produce a ZOI in laboratory
testing, the infection can persist, suggesting that the zone of
antimicrobial potency may be limited
(Swearingen et al., 2016).Antibiotic-loaded PMMA beads have been used to increase the effective area of antibiotic activity, but they have limited penetration into small spaces
and require surgical removal. Additionally, their relatively large size
( cm diameter) limits the number that can be packed into a
given volume. In contrast, ALCS-B allow for the rapid, full release of
antibiotics
(Dusane et
al., 2017), and our visual demonstration of ZOI produced by loaded PMMA
spacers alone, compared to spacers with ALCS-B, indicates how ALCS-B can aid
in releasing antibiotics to areas beyond the spacer.We also note that since the beads in our study were deliberately not
positioned carefully but rather scattered semi-randomly, ALCS-B either ended up relatively close to one or more of the distant (3 and 5 cm) discs
or fell farther away. This resulted in variability of killing efficacy. If
beads fell close to a biofilm-colonized disc, then there was a significant log reduction or eradication to below-detection limits, while discs further
away from beads exhibited less or no reduction. This spatial variation is
evidenced by some of the large error bars (Fig. 4a–d) and illustrates the
importance of adequate spatial coverage within a periprosthetic joint or
other infected surgical sites. Nevertheless, our in vitro data as well as those found clinically
(Morgenstern
et al., 2018; Ciofu et al., 2017), and data from other in vitro studies (Howlin
et al., 2015, 2017; Laycock et al., 2018; Knecht et al., 2018) support the
use of ALCS-B as an effective means of releasing antibiotic to prevent
biofilm spread and kill pre-grown bacterial biofilms.We recognize limitations in our study. Our study was conducted with only one
bacterial strain. While we have shown similar efficacy with other Gram-negative and -positive species with respect to prevention and killing
efficacy by antibiotics released from beads alone
(Howlin
et al., 2017, 2015), to add rigor to our conclusions, we would need to
include more pathogenic species and clinical strains. In addition, we used a
relatively young biofilm grown for 3 d which may be less antibiotic-tolerant and less clinically relevant than more mature biofilms. Also, our
in vitro model is simplistic compared to the complex mechanical and chemical environment of surrounding bones, particularly that of an articulating human
joint space. By design our model lacks any fluid flow, which would be
expected to enhance the spread of antibiotic from the spacer mimic and the
ALCS-B while also removing antibiotic from the system (i.e., there is no infinite sink where antibiotic can be removed from the system). A
pharmacokinetic study by Hayes et al. (2014) found the intra-articular concentration of gentamicin released
from a sponge in a dog dropped rapidly from approximately 2400
to 4 after 22.4 h. They concluded that this drop was due to
vascular exchange and inflammation. However, conventional in vitro studies of elution kinetics from antibiotic-loaded depots are also oversimplified. In these studies, the depot is placed in a reservoir of saline and the
concentration measured periodically. In some cases there is periodic
complete or partial exchange of the saline to create an infinite sink, where
the flux of the released drug is not limited by its build-up in the
reservoir (Fu and Kao, 2010). While these established
kinetic studies are useful for directly comparing the release kinetics of
different materials and indeed have been used to demonstrate faster release from ALCS-B than from PMMA beads
(McConoughey et al., 2015), these are
completely mixed systems and there are no gradients other than in the mass
boundary layer at the depot surface. Thus, they provide no information about
how the spatial arrangement of such depots may influence the local
distribution of antibiotics. Our diffusion model represents the opposite
extreme of a completely mixed system, yet we argue it has value for
illustrating how antibiotics may spread from depots when transport is
limited by diffusion and how the size, number, and spatial arrangement of
such depots may influence such spread. In a healthy knee, the flow of
synovial fluid caused by flexion of the joint during cyclic loading cycles
is thought to provide enough convective transport to deliver nutrients to
periarticular tissues, which can be up to 1 cm away from blood vessels
(Levick, 1995). Such a mechanism is
also expected to distribute antibiotics eluted from local carriers or
delivered systemically from the vasculature. However, it is not well
understood how well this transport mechanism functions in a reconstructed,
revised, and potentially immobilized joint. Radical debridement of the PJI
joint has been shown to compromise local blood flow to regions of the affected joint, especially bone. While such debridement may be necessary to rid the infected area of biofilm to the best extent possible, when
vasculature is compromised, the spread of antibiotics through bone and joint
tissues may be expected to be largely limited by diffusion
(Thabit et al., 2019). Other complicating
factors such as diabetes, kidney disease, or osteonecrosis secondary to
osteomyelitis may also limit the flow of systemic fluids. Diffusion is a
much slower process, particularly over longer distances, making ALCS-B a
potentially useful adjunct to antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacers (or other forms) for distributing the necessary amount of antibiotics in a
timely and effective manner. It is also possible that the lack of flow may
have resulted in pH changes or high calcium levels in the vicinity of the
beads. In previous studies we have demonstrated that unloaded beads alone do
not have antibacterial activity
(McConoughey et al., 2015), though we
did not investigate antibiotic–local chemistry interactions.The results from our in vitro study may support the adjuvant use of ALCS-B in the management of PJI, particularly for the release of antibiotics to the
interstices of the periprosthetic joint space in light of limited PMMA
diffusion with compromised vasculature. However, further work is required in
order to determine how our in vitro findings relate to the spread of antibiotics in the human joint or may relate to clinical outcomes. Such studies are not
trivial since measuring antibiotic concentrations at different locations in
tissues and fluids in a joint space requires multiple samplings at different
times, since sampling of joint fluid may not represent conditions everywhere
bacteria or biofilm may be present. We are currently developing a continuous
flow reactor system which can accommodate clinically relevant antibiotic-loaded spacer mimics and beads, where we match the flow rate with reported
clinical drainage rates following TKA revision. Such a system may provide
further insight into the complex interplay between antibiotic release
kinetics from various administration methods, including addition of
antibiotic powder.
PJI
Periprosthetic joint infection
TJA
Total joint arthroplasty
PMMA
Polymethyl methacrylate
ALBC-S
Antibiotic-loaded bone cement spacer
ALCS-B
Antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads
PA-Xen41
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Xen41
TSA
Tryptic soy agar
TSB
Tryptic soy broth
HA
Hydroxyapatite
UHMWPE
Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene
SS-316
316L stainless steel
Ti
Titanium
VAN
Vancomycin
TOB
Tobramycin
US
Unloaded spacer
LS
Loaded spacer
LS + ALCS-B
Loaded spacer and antibiotic-loaded calcium sulfate beads
Authors: R P Howlin; M J Brayford; J S Webb; J J Cooper; S S Aiken; P Stoodley Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2014-10-13 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Stephen J McConoughey; Robert P Howlin; Jessica Wiseman; Paul Stoodley; Jason H Calhoun Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2014-08-20 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: Jonathan B Mandell; Sara Orr; John Koch; Blake Nourie; Dongzhu Ma; Daniel D Bonar; Neel Shah; Kenneth L Urish Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: M Morgenstern; A Vallejo; M A McNally; T F Moriarty; J Y Ferguson; S Nijs; W J Metsemakers Journal: Bone Joint Res Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 5.853
Authors: Phillip A Laycock; John J Cooper; Robert P Howlin; Craig Delury; Sean Aiken; Paul Stoodley Journal: Materials (Basel) Date: 2018-11-13 Impact factor: 3.623
Authors: Edward J McPherson; Jessica A Jennings; Omar Yunis; Michael A Harris; Matthew V Dipane; Nora L Curtin; Madhav Chowdhry; Andrew J Wassef; Joel D Bumgardner; Scott P Noel Journal: J Bone Jt Infect Date: 2022-05-17