| Literature DB >> 30687219 |
Nikos Konstantinou1, Eva Pettemeridou2,3, Emmanuel A Stamatakis4, Ioannis Seimenis5, Fofi Constantinidou2,3.
Abstract
TBI results in significant cognitive impairments and in altered brain functional connectivity. However, no studies explored so far, the relationship between global functional connectivity and cognitive outcome in chronic moderate-severe TBI. This proof of principle study employed the intrinsic connectivity contrast, an objective voxel-based metric of global functional connectivity, in a small sample of chronic moderate-severe TBI participants and a group of healthy controls matched on gender (males), age, and education. Cognitive tests assessing executive functions, verbal memory, visual memory, attention/organization, and cognitive reserve were administered. Group differences in terms of global functional connectivity maps were assessed and the association between performance on the cognitive measures and global functional connectivity was examined. Next, we investigated the spatial extent of functional connectivity in the brain regions found to be associated with cognitive performance, using traditional seed-based analyses. Global functional connectivity of the TBI group was altered, compared to the controls. Moreover, the strength of global functional connectivity in affected brain areas was associated with cognitive outcome. These findings indicate that impaired global functional connectivity is a significant consequence of TBI suggesting that cognitive impairments following TBI may be partly attributed to altered functional connectivity between brain areas involved in the specific cognitive functions.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive outcome; functional connectivity; intrinsic connectivity contrast; resting state; traumatic brain injury
Year: 2019 PMID: 30687219 PMCID: PMC6335280 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.01163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Demographics and mechanisms of injury for TBI participants.
| 1 | M | 24 | 15 | 4 | 36 | 60 | Yes | Motor cycle injury |
| 2 | M | 29 | 12 | 8 | 28 | 166 | No | Fall (work or other non-sports related injury) |
| 3 | M | 29 | 14 | 5 | 70 | 176 | No | Fall (work or other non-sports related injury) |
| 4 | M | 60 | 11 | 5 | 7 | 156 | Yes | Motor vehicle crash |
| 5 | M | 24 | 14 | 3 | 61 | 84 | No | Pedestrian with vehicle collision |
| 6 | M | 47 | 12 | 6 | 30 | 274 | No | Motor vehicle crash |
| 7 | M | 30 | 18 | 7 | 30 | 179 | Yes | Motor cycle injury |
| 8 | M | 35 | 17 | 7 | 25 | 27 | No | Fall (work or other non-sports related injury) |
| 9 | M | 29 | 16 | 8 | 7 | 24 | Yes | Object fall |
M, male; GOSe, Glaston Outcome Scale Extended; TSI, Time since injury.
Performance of TBI participants on cognitive measures.
| Verbal Memory | −0.77 (0.93) | 2.12 | 18 | 0.025 | 0.87 |
| Visual Memory | −0.73 (1.36) | 1.63 | 18 | 0.060 | 0.70 |
| Executive Functions | −3.10 (4.47) | 2.29 | 18 | 0.017 | 0.93 |
| Attention/Organization | −1.46 (1.79) | 2.50 | 18 | 0.011 | 0.99 |
| Cognitive Reserve | −0.90 (1.69) | 1.56 | 18 | 0.070 | 0.67 |
SD, standard deviation; df, degrees of freedom; P, one-tailed.
Figure 1Within-group ICC maps for both groups. Results are presented on inflated brains created using the BrainNet tool (72). Images are displayed in neurological convention (left is left). Color scale represents t-score values.
Within-group correlations between ICC and cognitive measures (p-FDR < 0.05 corrected) for the TBI patients.
| Executive Functions | L Inferior Temporal gyrus | Positive | −40 | 8 | −40 | 38 | 9.58 | 0.000 | 0.011 |
| L Putamen | Negative | −10 | 8 | −6 | 219 | −13.30 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| Verbal Memory | L Medial Temporal pole | Positive | −50 | 8 | −28 | 74 | 12.36 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| L Middle Temporal gyrus | Positive | −62 | −14 | −12 | 50 | 10.83 | 0.000 | 0.001 | |
| R Inferior Frontal gyrus | Positive | 42 | 30 | −22 | 43 | 10.70 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
| L Superior Parietal lobule | Positive | −24 | −68 | 64 | 22 | 9.28 | 0.002 | 0.033 | |
| R Superior Medial Frontal gyrus | Positive | 16 | 62 | 14 | 22 | 6.52 | 0.002 | 0.033 | |
| R Precuneus | Negative | 30 | −56 | 20 | 68 | −14.18 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| R Angular gyrus | Negative | 42 | −46 | 22 | 52 | −9.54 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
| Visual Memory | L Middle Temporal gyrus | Positive | −52 | −6 | −24 | 37 | 7.39 | 0.000 | 0.021 |
| L Putamen | Negative | −18 | 20 | −6 | 79 | −17.08 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| R Anterior Cingulate | Negative | 10 | 28 | −2 | 77 | −11.73 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| L Superior Orbital Frontal gyrus | Negative | −12 | 22 | −18 | 66 | −10.92 | 0.000 | 0.000 | |
| L Hippocampus | Negative | −30 | −32 | −6 | 25 | −10.47 | 0.000 | 0.021 | |
| L Pallidum | Negative | −8 | 2 | −4 | 21 | −8.95 | 0.002 | 0.037 | |
| Attention | L Superior Temporal gyrus | Positive | −46 | 10 | −24 | 77 | 8.48 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| L Putamen | Negative | −22 | 14 | −6 | 52 | −11.38 | 0.000 | 0.002 | |
| R Caudate Nucleus | Negative | 12 | 16 | −10 | 34 | −8.44 | 0.000 | 0.013 | |
| Cognitive Reserve | L Superior Temporal gyrus | Positive | −46 | 10 | −26 | 61 | 7.82 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
L, left hemisphere; R, right hemisphere; p-unc, p-value for the cluster uncorrected; p-FDR, p-value for the cluster corrected for multiple comparisons; T-value, t-value for peak voxel.
Figure 2Voxel-wise correlations between ICC extracted from brain regions depicted on the right-hand panels and individual scores in the cognitive constructed measures along with the corresponding scatter plots (left-hand panels). The scatter plots on the left show in detail the relationship between ICC and cognitive measures in each of the statistical peaks for both groups (TBI: solid lines, closed circles, HC: dashed lines, open circles). Results are overlaid onto a standard single subject T1-weighted MR-image (ch2-template) in the MRICroN software (71). (A) Correlation between the cognitive measure of executive function and right middle Temporal gyrus in both groups. The correlation of ICC with executive function scores was positive in participants with TBI [r(6) = 0.70; p = 0.04] and negative in the healthy controls [r(9) = −0.92; p < 0.001] for the right middle temporal gyrus [peak at x, y, z = 44, −70, 8; t(1, 16) = 6.66; p-FDR < 0.05]. (B) Correlation between verbal memory and right inferior Temporal gyrus in both groups. The correlation of ICC with verbal memory scores was negative in participants with TBI [r(6) = 0.79; p = 0.01] and positive in the healthy controls [r(9) = 0.85; p = 0.001] for the right inferior Temporal gyrus [peak at x, y, z = 38, 2, −42; t(1, 16) = 6.01; p-FDR = 0.04]. (C) Correlation between cognitive reserve and right middle Frontal gyrus in both groups. The correlation of ICC with cognitive reserve scores exhibited a negative trend in participants with TBI but did not reach statistical significance [r(6) = −0.46; p = 0.21], whereas it was positive in the healthy controls [r(9) = 0.90; p < 0.001] for the right middle frontal gyrus [peak at x, y, z = 32, 54, 30; t(1, 16) = 6.13; p-FDR < 0.001]. (D) Correlation between cognitive reserve and left Temporal pole in both groups. The correlation of ICC with cognitive reserve scores was positive in participants with TBI [r(6) = 0.84; p = 0.005] and negative in the healthy controls [r(9) = −0.88; p < 0.001) for the left temporal pole [peak at x, y, z = −46, 24, −28; t(1, 16) = 6.46; p-FDR < 0.001). (E) Correlation between cognitive reserve and left Subcallosal cortex in both groups. The correlation of ICC with cognitive reserve scores was positive in participants with TBI [r(6) = 0.68; p < 0.05] and negative in the healthy controls [r(9) = −0.89; p < 0.001] for the left subcallosal cortex [peak at x, y, z = −6, 12, −26; t(1, 16) = 6.80; p-FDR < 0.001]. Percent signal change, p.s.c.
Figure 3Within-group functional connectivity maps calculated from seed areas showing significant correlations with the TBI participants. Voxels showing significant positive functional connectivity are shown in red–yellow color scale, and voxels showing significant negative functional connectivity are shown in green-blue color scale.
Figure 4Within-group functional connectivity maps calculated from seed areas showing a significant interaction between the healthy controls and the TBI participants. Voxels showing significant positive functional connectivity are shown in red–yellow color scale, and voxels showing significant negative functional connectivity are shown in green-blue color scale.
Figure 5Results of the between-group comparisons of the seed-based analyses overlaid on a template brain. Blue represents greater functional connectivity in the TBI participants compared to the healthy controls. Red color represents greater functional connectivity in the healthy controls compared to the TBI participants. Small brain images with green circles represent the seed area. Results are overlaid onto a standard single subject T1-weighted MR-image (ch2bet-template) in the MRICroN software (71). Images are displayed in neurological convention (left is left). (A) Seed, left middle temporal pole. Peak, left middle frontal sulcus at x, y, z = −22, 8, 48; t(1, 16) = 3.69; pDFR = 0.022. (B) Seed, left putamen. Peak, right postcentral gyrus at x, y, z = 56, −8, 36; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.036. (C) Seed, left pallidum. Peak, left superior medial frontal gyrus at x, y, z = 6, 72, 10; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.001. (D) Seed, left hippocampus. Peak, right middle frontal sulcus at x, y, z = 30, 38, 26; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.003. (E) Seed, left hippocampus. Peak, right precuneus at x, y, z = 16, −78, 48; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.039. (F) Seed, left hippocampus. Peak, right precentral sulcus at x, y, z = 42, −12, 36; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.039. (G) Seed, left hippocampus. Peak, left superior occipital lobule [peak at x, y, z = −10, −80, 42; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.047]. (H) Seed, left hippocampus. Peak, right precentral sulcus at x, y, z = 42, 2, 34; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.047. (I) Seed, left superior orbito-frontal gyrus. Peak, left calcarine sulcus [peak at x, y, z = −14, −80, 10; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.048]. (J) Seed, left superior orbito-frontal gyrus. Peak, left inferior orbito-frontal gyrus at x, y, z = −14, 14, −26; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.048. (K) Seed, right angular gyrus. Peak, left precuneus at x, y, z = −10, −80, 42; t(1, 17) = 3.65; pDFR = 0.001. (L) Seed, left middle temporal gyrus. Peak, left anterior cingulum at x, y, z = 0, 42, 0; t(1, 18) = 3.61; pDFR = 0.017.