Literature DB >> 30686843

Estimating the Causal Effect of Treatment in Observational Studies with Survival Time Endpoints and Unmeasured Confounding.

Jaeun Choi1, A James O'Malley2.   

Abstract

Estimation of the effect of a treatment in the presence of unmeasured confounding is a common objective in observational studies. The Two Stage Least Squares (2SLS) Instrumental Variables (IV) procedure is frequently used but is not applicable to time-to-event data if some observations are censored. We develop a simultaneous equations model (SEM) to account for unmeasured confounding of the effect of treatment on survival time subject to censoring. The identification of the treatment effect is assisted by IVs (variables related to treatment but conditional on treatment not to the outcome) and the assumed bivariate distribution underlying the data generating process. The methodology is illustrated on data from an observational study of time to death following endovascular or open repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. As the IV and the distributional assumptions cannot be jointly assessed from the observed data, we evaluate the sensitivity of the results to these assumptions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Comparative effectiveness research; Instrumental variable; Observational study; Simultaneous equations model; Survival analysis

Year:  2016        PMID: 30686843      PMCID: PMC6345269          DOI: 10.1111/rssc.12158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat        ISSN: 0035-9254            Impact factor:   1.864


  16 in total

1.  Administrative and artificial censoring in censored regression models.

Authors:  M M Joffe
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  A causal proportional hazards estimator for the effect of treatment actually received in a randomized trial with all-or-nothing compliance.

Authors:  T Loeys; E Goetghebeur
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Estimating probit models with self-selected treatments.

Authors:  Jay Bhattacharya; Dana Goldman; Daniel McCaffrey
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  The effect of medicare health maintenance organizations on hospitalization rates for ambulatory care-sensitive conditions.

Authors:  Feng Zeng; June F O'Leary; Elizabeth M Sloss; Melissa Succi Lopez; Nasreen Dhanani; Glenn Melnick
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Two-stage residual inclusion estimation: addressing endogeneity in health econometric modeling.

Authors:  Joseph V Terza; Anirban Basu; Paul J Rathouz
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 3.883

7.  Preference-based instrumental variable methods for the estimation of treatment effects: assessing validity and interpreting results.

Authors:  M Alan Brookhart; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Int J Biostat       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 0.968

8.  Inference for the effect of treatment on survival probability in randomized trials with noncompliance and administrative censoring.

Authors:  Hui Nie; Jing Cheng; Dylan S Small
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  Use of radical cystectomy for patients with invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  John L Gore; Mark S Litwin; Julie Lai; Elizabeth M Yano; Rodger Madison; Claude Setodji; John L Adams; Christopher S Saigal
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-04-16       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies.

Authors:  Jaclyn L F Bosco; Rebecca A Silliman; Soe Soe Thwin; Ann M Geiger; Diana S M Buist; Marianne N Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Reina Haque; Feifei Wei; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 6.437

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nonparametric Bayesian Instrumental Variable Analysis: Evaluating Heterogeneous Effects of Coronary Arterial Access Site Strategies.

Authors:  Samrachana Adhikari; Sherri Rose; Sharon-Lise Normand
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 5.033

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.