Literature DB >> 30685513

Translating experimental paradigms into individual-differences research: Contributions, challenges, and practical recommendations.

Stephanie C Goodhew1, Mark Edwards2.   

Abstract

Psychological science has long been cleaved by a fundamental divide between researchers who experimentally manipulate variables and those who measure existing individual-differences. Increasingly, however, researchers are appreciating the value of integrating these approaches. Here, we used visual attention research as a case-in-point for how this gap can be bridged. Traditionally, researchers have predominately adopted experimental approaches to investigating visual attention. Increasingly, however, researchers are integrating individual-differences approaches with experimental approaches to answer novel and innovative research questions. However, individual differences research challenges some of the core assumptions and practices of experimental research. The purpose of this review, therefore, is to provide a timely summary and discussion of the key issues. While these are contextualised in the field of visual attention, the discussion of these issues has implications for psychological research more broadly. In doing so, we provide eight practical recommendations for proposed solutions and novel avenues for research moving forward.
Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attention; Correlational; Experimental; Individual differences; Methodology; Reliability; Variability; Visual attention

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30685513     DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2019.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conscious Cogn        ISSN: 1053-8100


  18 in total

1.  On the relationship between trait autobiographical episodic memory and spatial navigation.

Authors:  Carina L Fan; Hervé Abdi; Brian Levine
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2020-10-13

2.  A vigilance avoidance account of spatial selectivity in dual-stream emotion induced blindness.

Authors:  Matthew Proud; Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-04

3.  When cognitive control harms rather than helps: individuals with high working memory capacity are less efficient at infrequent contraction of attentional breadth.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-04-30

4.  The stability and reliability of attentional bias measures in the dot-probe task: Evidence from both traditional mean bias scores and trial-level bias scores.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Lin Fang
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2020-05-24

5.  Can we measure individual differences in cognitive measures reliably via smartphones? A comparison of the flanker effect across device types and samples.

Authors:  Thomas Pronk; Rebecca J Hirst; Reinout W Wiers; Jaap M J Murre
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-16

6.  Evaluating individual differences in rewarded Stroop performance: reliability and associations with self-report measures.

Authors:  Brent Pitchford; Karen M Arnell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-06-16

Review 7.  Don't look now! Emotion-induced blindness: The interplay between emotion and attention.

Authors:  Stephanie C Goodhew; Mark Edwards
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 2.199

8.  The domain-specificity of serial order working memory.

Authors:  Yingxue Tian; Margaret E Beier; Simon Fischer-Baum
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2021-12-27

9.  Differential Effects of Cerebellar Degeneration on Feedforward versus Feedback Control across Speech and Reaching Movements.

Authors:  Benjamin Parrell; Hyosub E Kim; Assaf Breska; Arohi Saxena; Richard Ivry
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Individual differences in infancy research: Letting the baby stand out from the crowd.

Authors:  Koraly Pérez-Edgar; Alicia Vallorani; Kristin A Buss; Vanessa LoBue
Journal:  Infancy       Date:  2020-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.