Literature DB >> 30684479

Sutureless Aortic Valve and Pacemaker Rate: From Surgical Tricks to Clinical Outcomes.

Ferdinand Vogt1, Marco Moscarelli2, Anna Nicoletti3, Renato Gregorini3, Francesco Pollari4, Jurji M Kalisnik5, Steffen Pfeiffer6, Theodor Fischlein6, Giuseppe Santarpino7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several studies reported high rates of postoperative permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation, which has been described as the "Achilles' heel" of sutureless aortic valve replacement (AVR).
METHODS: From July 2010 to December 2017, 3,158 patients with symptomatic, severe aortic valve stenosis were referred to the Department of Cardiac Surgery (Klinikum Nürnberg - Paraclesus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany), and 512 received a Perceval sutureless bioprosthesis (LivaNova PLC, London, United Kingdom). Thirty-nine patients who had been discharged with concomitant PPM implantation were reevaluated.
RESULTS: After a cumulative follow-up of 1,534 months (100% complete, median 50 months, interquartile range 30 months, maximum 76 months, minimum 3 months), a total of 22 patients were still pacemaker dependent. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed pacemaker-dependent rhythm in 92.0%, 80.0%, 49.4%, and 32.3% of patients at 1, 2, 4, and 5 years, respectively. At Cox regression analysis, pressure during valve deployment (hazard ratio, 79.41; p = 0.0003) and "late-onset" atrioventricular block were found to be independent predictors of sinus rhythm restoration (hazard ratio, 0.16; p = 0.0061). Log-rank test showed significantly lower pacemaker dependency rates in patients with "low-pressure" prosthesis implantation (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that several technical measures, including appropriate annulus decalcification, precise positioning of guiding sutures, release of traction sutures applied to the valve commissures, and ballooning with reduced pressure, all reduce the rate of PPM implantation after sutureless AVR. Furthermore, a high proportion of patients were found to be no longer pacemaker dependent at follow-up.
Copyright © 2019 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30684479     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.12.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  11 in total

1.  Long-term outcomes of sutureless and rapid-deployment aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael L Williams; Campbell D Flynn; Andrew A Mamo; David H Tian; Utz Kappert; Manuel Wilbring; Thierry Folliguet; Antonio Fiore; Antonio Miceli; Augusto D'Onofrio; Giorgia Cibin; Gino Gerosa; Mattia Glauber; Theodor Fischlein; Francesco Pollari
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-07

2.  Conduction disorders after aortic valve replacement: what is the real impact of sutureless and rapid deployment valves?

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Luca Montecchiani; Fabio Vagnarelli; Mariano Cefarelli; Jacopo Alfonsi; Carlo Zingaro; Filippo Capestro; Michele D Pierri; Alessandro D'alfonso; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

3.  Aortic valve replacement using stented or sutureless/rapid deployment prosthesis via either full-sternotomy or a minimally invasive approach: a network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kei Woldendorp; Mathew P Doyle; Paul G Bannon; Martin Misfeld; Tristan D Yan; Giuseppe Santarpino; Paolo Berretta; Marco Di Eusanio; Bart Meuris; Alfredo Giuseppe Cerillo; Pierluigi Stefàno; Niccolò Marchionni; Jacqueline K Olive; Tom C Nguyen; Marco Solinas; Giacomo Bianchi
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-09

4.  Avoiding oversizing in sutureless valves leads to lower transvalvular gradients and less permanent pacemaker implants postoperatively.

Authors:  Delphine Szecel; Marie Lamberigts; Filip Rega; Peter Verbrugghe; Christophe Dubois; Bart Meuris
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2022-07-09

5.  Surgical technique modifies the postoperative atrioventricular block rate in sutureless prostheses.

Authors:  Miguel González Barbeito; Francisco Estévez-Cid; Patricia Pardo Martínez; Carlos Velasco García de Sierra; Carmen Iglesias Gil; Cristina Quiñones Laguillo; José Joaquín Cuenca Castillo
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  A pooled analysis of pacemaker implantation after Perceval sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Santarpino; Thanos Athanasiou; Pasquale Mastroroberto; Khalil Fattouch; Giuseppe Nasso; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-10-04

7.  Recovery of conduction disorders after sutureless aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Ka Yan Lam; Naomi Timmermans; Ferdi Akca; Erwin Tan; Niels J Verberkmoes; Kim de Kort; Mohamed Soliman-Hamad; Albert H M van Straten
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-10

8.  Sex-specific differences and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive and sternotomy valve surgery.

Authors:  Marco Moscarelli; Roberto Lorusso; Gianni D Angelini; Nicola Di Bari; Domenico Paparella; Khalil Fattouch; Alberto Albertini; Giuseppe Nasso; Francesca Fiorentino; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 4.191

9.  The Aortic Annulus Stabilization Technique Prevents Paravalvular Leaks after Rapid Deployment Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Elena Caporali; Roberto Lorusso; Tiziano Torre; Francesca Toto; Alberto Pozzoli; Giovanni Pedrazzini; Stefanos Demertzis; Enrico Ferrari
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Sutureless aortic valve replacement in multivalve procedures.

Authors:  Alina Zubarevich; Marcin Szczechowicz; Konstantin Zhigalov; Anja Osswald; Jef Van den Eynde; Arian Arjomandi Rad; Robert Vardanyan; Daniel Wendt; Bastian Schmack; Arjang Ruhparwar; Alexander Weymann
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.