Literature DB >> 33102177

Conduction disorders after aortic valve replacement: what is the real impact of sutureless and rapid deployment valves?

Paolo Berretta1, Luca Montecchiani1, Fabio Vagnarelli2, Mariano Cefarelli1, Jacopo Alfonsi1, Carlo Zingaro1, Filippo Capestro1, Michele D Pierri1, Alessandro D'alfonso1, Marco Di Eusanio1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although sutureless and rapid deployment aortic valve replacement (SURD-AVR) has been associated with an increased rate of permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation compared to conventional AVR (c-AVR), the predictors of new conduction abnormalities remain to be clarified. This study aimed to identify risk factors for conduction disorders in patients undergoing AVR surgery.
METHODS: Data from 243 patients receiving minimally invasive AVR were prospectively collected. SURD-AVR was performed in 103 (42.4%) patients and c-AVR in 140 (57.6%). The primary endpoint was the occurrence of new-onset conduction disorders, defined as first degree atrioventricular (AV) block, advanced AV block requiring PPM implantation, left anterior fascicular block (LAFB), left bundle branch block (LBBB) and right bundle branch block (RBBB).
RESULTS: The unadjusted comparison revealed that SURD-AVR was associated with a higher rate of advanced AV block requiring PPM when compared with c-AVR (10.5% vs. 2.1%, P=0.01). After adjusting for other measured covariates (OR: 1.6, P=0.58) and for the estimated propensity of SURD-AVR (OR: 5.1, P=0.1), no significant relationship between type of AVR and PPM implantation emerged. On multivariable analysis, preoperative first-degree AV block (OR: 6.9, P=0.04) and RBBB (OR: 6.9, P=0.03) were independent risk factors for PPM. Subgroup analysis of patients with normal preoperative conduction revealed similar incidence of PPM between SURD-AVR and c-AVR (1.3% vs. 1.9%, P=0.6). When compared with c-AVR, SURD-AVR was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative new onset LBBB (18.1% vs. 3.2%, P<0.001). This finding was confirmed after adjusting for the estimated propensity of SURD-AVR (OR: 6.3, P=0.009).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that the risk of PPM implantation in patients receiving surgical AVR is heavily influenced by the presence of pre-existing conduction disturbances rather than the type of valve prosthesis. Conversely, SURD-AVR emerged as an independent predictor for LBBB and was associated with an increased risk of PPM in patients presenting with RBBB. 2020 Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Sutureless aortic valve replacement; aortic valve replacement (AVR); conduction disorders; rapid deployment aortic valve replacement

Year:  2020        PMID: 33102177      PMCID: PMC7548213          DOI: 10.21037/acs-2020-surd-26

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 2225-319X


  28 in total

1.  Implementation of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in France.

Authors:  Virginia Nguyen; Morgane Michel; Helene Eltchaninoff; Martine Gilard; Christel Dindorf; Bernard Iung; Elias Mossialos; Alain Cribier; Alec Vahanian; Karine Chevreul; David Messika-Zeitoun
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 24.094

2.  Ultra fast track surgery: a rapid deployment aortic valve replacement through a J-ministernotomy.

Authors:  Paolo Berretta; Mariano Cefarelli; Walter Vessella; Michele D Pierri; Roberto Carozza; Giulia Abramucci; Christopher Munch; Hossein M Zahedi; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-05-08

3.  Operative outcome of patients at low, intermediate, high and 'very high' surgical risk undergoing isolated aortic valve replacement with sutureless and rapid deployment prostheses: results of the SURD-IR registry.

Authors:  Giuseppe Santarpino; Paolo Berretta; Theodor Fischlein; Thierry P Carrel; Kevin Teoh; Martin Misfeld; Carlo Savini; Utz Kappert; Mattia Glauber; Emmanuel Villa; Bart Meuris; Carmelo Mignosa; Alberto Albertini; Gianluca Martinelli; Thierry A Folliguet; Malak Shrestha; Marco Solinas; Günther Laufer; Kevin Phan; Tristan Yan; Marco Di Eusanio
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.191

4.  Perioperative Results and Complications in 15,964 Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacements: Prospective Data From the GARY Registry.

Authors:  Thomas Walther; Christian W Hamm; Gerhard Schuler; Alexander Berkowitsch; Joachim Kötting; Norman Mangner; Harald Mudra; Andreas Beckmann; Jochen Cremer; Armin Welz; Rüdiger Lange; Karl-Heinz Kuck; Friedrich W Mohr; Helge Möllmann
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2015-03-15       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Rapid Deployment Versus Conventional Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Stephan Ensminger; Buntaro Fujita; Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Beckmann; Raffi Bekeredjian; Sabine Bleiziffer; Sandra Landwehr; Christian W Hamm; Friedrich W Mohr; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Harringer; Thomas Walther; Christian Frerker
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Impact of new pacemaker implantation following surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on 1-year outcome.

Authors:  Buntaro Fujita; Tobias Schmidt; Sabine Bleiziffer; Timm Bauer; Andreas Beckmann; Raffi Bekeredjian; Helge Möllmann; Thomas Walther; Sandra Landwehr; Christian Hamm; Friedhelm Beyersdorf; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Harringer; Stephan Ensminger; Christian Frerker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 7.  Ultra fast-track minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: going beyond reduced incisions.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Walter Vessella; Roberto Carozza; Filippo Capestro; Alessandro D'Alfonso; Carlo Zingaro; Christopher Munch; Paolo Berretta
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.191

8.  Assessment of atrioventricular conduction in aortic valve disease.

Authors:  H S Friedman; Q Zaman; J I Haft; S Melendez
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1978-08

9.  Trends in practice and outcomes from 2011 to 2015 for surgical aortic valve replacement: an update from the German Aortic Valve Registry on 42 776 patients.

Authors:  Buntaro Fujita; Stephan Ensminger; Timm Bauer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Beckmann; Raffi Bekeredjian; Sabine Bleiziffer; Elke Schäfer; Christian W Hamm; Friedrich W Mohr; Hugo A Katus; Wolfgang Harringer; Thomas Walther; Christian Frerker
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  2016 Annual Report of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapy Registry.

Authors:  Frederick L Grover; Sreekanth Vemulapalli; John D Carroll; Fred H Edwards; Michael J Mack; Vinod H Thourani; Ralph G Brindis; David M Shahian; Carlos E Ruiz; Jeffrey P Jacobs; George Hanzel; Joseph E Bavaria; E Murat Tuzcu; Eric D Peterson; Susan Fitzgerald; Matina Kourtis; Joan Michaels; Barbara Christensen; William F Seward; Kathleen Hewitt; David R Holmes
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 24.094

View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: short-term efficacy of sutureless compared with stented bioprostheses.

Authors:  Domenico Paparella; Giuseppe Santarpino; Marco Moscarelli; Pietro Guida; Adriano De Santis; Khalil Fattouch; Luigi Martinelli; Roberto Coppola; Elisa Mikus; Alberto Albertini; Mauro Del Giglio; Renato Gregorini; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-26

2.  Commentary: Is the need for permanent pacemaker after aortic valve replacement such a big deal?

Authors:  Sarah Yousef; Danny Chu
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-10-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.