Literature DB >> 20628281

Using technology to improve data capture and integration of patient-reported outcomes into clinical care: pilot results in a busy colorectal unit.

Brooke Gurland1, Patricia C Alves-Ferreira, Timothy Sobol, Ravi P Kiran.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Patient-reported outcomes are traditionally collected through paper questionnaires. This process is labor intensive and costly. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of using tablet computing technology to streamline the questionnaire intake process and integrate patient-reported outcomes into electronic health records for access at the point of care.
METHODS: Response-driven electronic questionnaires for patients with colorectal disorders were designed. The impact of this technology on clinical workflow and questionnaire response rates was assessed. Historical data on paper questionnaire response rates over a similar time period were compared with the electronic data.
RESULTS: From June through July 2009, data from 103 patient visits to 2 surgeons over 8 clinic days were included. Females comprised 69.7% of the sample with a median age of 49 (range, 18-84) years. When patients checked in 30 minutes early, 82% completed the forms by their scheduled visit time. The questionnaires response rate was 96%. Scores were calculated automatically and included in the electronic health record. Median questionnaire completion time was 15 (interquartile range, 8-21) minutes. Conversely, collection rates of historical data for the same surgeons over a 2-month period revealed that 152 patient visits yielded 38 paper questionnaires, a response rate of 25%.
CONCLUSION: Collection of patient-reported outcomes by use of tablet technology and automatic transmission into the electronic chart with data storage for later use is feasible. This process can overcome many of the inefficiencies associated with paper questionnaires.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20628281     DOI: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181d87468

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  12 in total

1.  Should we offer ventral rectopexy to patients with recurrent external rectal prolapse?

Authors:  Brooke Gurland; Maria Emilia Carvalho E Carvalho; Beri Ridgeway; Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Tracy Hull; Massarat Zutshi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Electronic medical records in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Matthias Turina; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2013-03

3.  Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.

Authors:  Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jessica Quinn; David J Klein; Stephanie Wagner; Cassandra Thomson; Melody Wu; Sarah Onorato; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.107

4.  Multiple sclerosis and fatigue: understanding the patient's needs.

Authors:  Karon F Cook; Alyssa M Bamer; Toni S Roddey; George H Kraft; Jiseon Kim; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 1.784

Review 5.  The role of informatics in promoting patient-centered care.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Albert W Wu; Robert S Miller; Roxanne E Jensen; Elissa T Bantug; Antonio C Wolff
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.360

6.  Colectomy for slow transit constipation: effective for patients with coexistent obstructed defecation.

Authors:  Avraham Reshef; Patricia Alves-Ferreira; Massarat Zutshi; Tracy Hull; Brooke Gurland
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-03-23       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Advancing the use of patient-reported outcomes in practice: understanding challenges, opportunities, and the potential of health information technology.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Hsiao; Christine Dymek; Bryan Kim; Brigid Russell
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Perineal wound healing following ileoanal pouch excision.

Authors:  Pasha J Nisar; Matthias Turina; Ian C Lavery; Ravi P Kiran
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Detecting dissonance in clinical and research workflow for translational psychiatric registries.

Authors:  Luciana Cofiel; Débora U Bassi; Ryan Kumar Ray; Ricardo Pietrobon; Helena Brentani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Electronic capture of patient-reported and clinician-reported outcome measures in an elective orthopaedic setting: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Karan Malhotra; Olatunbosun Buraimoh; James Thornton; Nicholas Cullen; Dishan Singh; Andrew J Goldberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.