Literature DB >> 30683958

The Uznadze illusion reveals similar effects of relative size on perception and action.

Stefano Uccelli1, Veronica Pisu2, Lucia Riggio2, Nicola Bruno2.   

Abstract

Milner and Goodale (the visual brain in action, Oxford University Press Inc., Oxford, 1995) proposed a functional dissociation between vision-for-action and vision-for-perception (i.e., the "two-visual system hypothesis", TVSH). Supporting the TVSH, it has been claimed that visual illusions affect perception but not actions. However, at least for the Ebbinghaus illusion, numerous studies have revealed consistent illusion effects on grasping. Thus, whether illusions affect actions remains controversial. To further investigate the dissociation predicted by the TVSH, we used a visual version of the Uznadze illusion (the same stimulus will feel smaller after feeling a larger stimulus and larger after feeling a smaller stimulus). Based on kinematic recordings of finger aperture in a motor (precision grip) and a perceptual task (manual estimation), we report two main findings. First, both action and perception are strongly affected by the Uznadze illusion. Second, the illusion decreases similarly in both tasks when inducing-induced pairs had different shape and color, in comparison to the equivalent condition where these features are the same. These results are inconsistent with a perception-action dissociation as predicted by the TVSH and suggest that, at least in the present conditions, vision-for-perception and vision-for-action are similarly affected by contextual cues.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Action; Grasping; Perception; Similarity; Uznadze effect

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30683958     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05480-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  41 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Do action systems resist visual illusions?

Authors:  D P. Carey
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  The dissociation between perception and action in the Ebbinghaus illusion: nonillusory effects of pictorial cues on grasp.

Authors:  A M Haffenden; K C Schiff; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Grasping visual illusions: no evidence for a dissociation between perception and action.

Authors:  V H Franz; K R Gegenfurtner; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-01

6.  Action does not resist visual illusions.

Authors:  Volker H. Franz
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-11-01       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  When does action resist visual illusions?

Authors:  N Bruno
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  On the psychophysical law.

Authors:  S S STEVENS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1957-05       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Grasping the past. delay can improve visuomotor performance.

Authors:  A D Milner; H C Dijkerman; L Pisella; R D McIntosh; C Tilikete; A Vighetto; Y Rossetti
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 10.834

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Semantics of Natural Objects and Tools in the Brain: A Combined Behavioral and MEG Study.

Authors:  Elisa Visani; Davide Rossi Sebastiano; Dunja Duran; Gioacchino Garofalo; Fabio Magliocco; Francesco Silipo; Giovanni Buccino
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-01-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.