Literature DB >> 11239810

Do action systems resist visual illusions?

D P. Carey1.   

Abstract

Arguments about the relative independence of visual modules in the primate brain are not new. Recently, though, these debates have resurfaced in the form of arguments about the extent to which visuomotor reaching and grasping systems are insensitive to visual illusions that dramatically bias visual perception. The first wave of studies of illusory effects on perception and action have supported the idea of independence of motor systems, but recent findings have been more critical. In this article, I review several of these studies, most of which (but not all) can be reconciled with the two-visual-systems model.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11239810     DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01592-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  41 in total

1.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociating perception and action in Kanizsa's compression illusion.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2002-12

3.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  When does action resist visual illusions? Effector position modulates illusory influences on motor responses.

Authors:  Nicola Bruno; Paolo Bernardis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Abstraction from a sensori-motor perspective: can we get a quick hold on simple perception?

Authors:  Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Visual processing for action resists similarity of relevant and irrelevant object features.

Authors:  Markus Janczyk; Wilfried Kunde
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-06

8.  The visual control of stepping operates in real time: Evidence from a pictorial illusion.

Authors:  Elizabeth M McCarville; David A Westwood
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Does an auditory perceptual illusion affect on-line auditory action control? The case of (de)accentuation and synchronization.

Authors:  Bruno H Repp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-22       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  How does action resist visual illusion? Uncorrected oculomotor information does not account for accurate pointing in peripersonal space.

Authors:  Paolo Bernardis; Paul Knox; Nicola Bruno
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.