Literature DB >> 30683732

Gap perception in bumblebees.

Sridhar Ravi1,2, Olivier Bertrand3, Tim Siesenop3, Lea-Sophie Manz3,4, Charlotte Doussot3, Alex Fisher2, Martin Egelhaaf3.   

Abstract

A number of insects fly over long distances below the natural canopy, where the physical environment is highly cluttered consisting of obstacles of varying shape, size and texture. While navigating within such environments, animals need to perceive and disambiguate environmental features that might obstruct their flight. The most elemental aspect of aerial navigation through such environments is gap identification and 'passability' evaluation. We used bumblebees to seek insights into the mechanisms used for gap identification when confronted with an obstacle in their flight path and behavioral compensations employed to assess gap properties. Initially, bumblebee foragers were trained to fly though an unobstructed flight tunnel that led to a foraging chamber. After the bees were familiar with this situation, we placed a wall containing a gap that unexpectedly obstructed the flight path on a return trip to the hive. The flight trajectories of the bees as they approached the obstacle wall and traversed the gap were analyzed in order to evaluate their behavior as a function of the distance between the gap and a background wall that was placed behind the gap. Bumblebees initially decelerated when confronted with an unexpected obstacle. Deceleration was first noticed when the obstacle subtended around 35 deg on the retina but also depended on the properties of the gap. Subsequently, the bees gradually traded off their longitudinal velocity to lateral velocity and approached the gap with increasing lateral displacement and lateral velocity. Bumblebees shaped their flight trajectory depending on the salience of the gap, indicated in our case by the optic flow contrast between the region within the gap and on the obstacle, which decreased with decreasing distance between the gap and the background wall. As the optic flow contrast decreased, the bees spent an increasing amount of time moving laterally across the obstacles. During these repeated lateral maneuvers, the bees are probably assessing gap geometry and passability.
© 2019. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cluttered environment; Flight; Optic flow; Sensorimotor system; Vision

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30683732     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.184135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  9 in total

1.  Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; William H Warren; Stacey A Combes; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  From Paths to Routes: A Method for Path Classification.

Authors:  Andrea Gonsek; Manon Jeschke; Silvia Rönnau; Olivier J N Bertrand
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.558

4.  Analysing Head-Thorax Choreography During Free-Flights in Bumblebees.

Authors:  Luise Odenthal; Charlotte Doussot; Stefan Meyer; Olivier J N Bertrand
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 3.558

5.  Information Is Where You Find It: Perception as an Ecologically Well-Posed Problem.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-03-22

6.  Spatial tuning of translational optic flow responses in hawkmoths of varying body size.

Authors:  Rebecca Grittner; Emily Baird; Anna Stöckl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Minding the gap: learning and visual scanning behaviour in nocturnal bull ants.

Authors:  Muzahid Islam; Sudhakar Deeti; J Frances Kamhi; Ken Cheng
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 8.  Ecological Entomology: How Is Gibson's Framework Useful?

Authors:  Aimie Berger Dauxère; Julien R Serres; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field.

Authors:  Nicholas P Burnett; Marc A Badger; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.