Literature DB >> 33229535

Bumblebees perceive the spatial layout of their environment in relation to their body size and form to minimize inflight collisions.

Sridhar Ravi1,2, Tim Siesenop3, Olivier Bertrand3, Liang Li4,5,6, Charlotte Doussot3, William H Warren7, Stacey A Combes8, Martin Egelhaaf3.   

Abstract

Animals that move through complex habitats must frequently contend with obstacles in their path. Humans and other highly cognitive vertebrates avoid collisions by perceiving the relationship between the layout of their surroundings and the properties of their own body profile and action capacity. It is unknown whether insects, which have much smaller brains, possess such abilities. We used bumblebees, which vary widely in body size and regularly forage in dense vegetation, to investigate whether flying insects consider their own size when interacting with their surroundings. Bumblebees trained to fly in a tunnel were sporadically presented with an obstructing wall containing a gap that varied in width. Bees successfully flew through narrow gaps, even those that were much smaller than their wingspans, by first performing lateral scanning (side-to-side flights) to visually assess the aperture. Bees then reoriented their in-flight posture (i.e., yaw or heading angle) while passing through, minimizing their projected frontal width and mitigating collisions; in extreme cases, bees flew entirely sideways through the gap. Both the time that bees spent scanning during their approach and the extent to which they reoriented themselves to pass through the gap were determined not by the absolute size of the gap, but by the size of the gap relative to each bee's own wingspan. Our findings suggest that, similar to humans and other vertebrates, flying bumblebees perceive the affordance of their surroundings relative their body size and form to navigate safely through complex environments.

Entities:  

Keywords:  affordances; cluttered environments; insect flight; navigation; self-size perception

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33229535      PMCID: PMC7733852          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2016872117

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Biomechanical strategies for mitigating collision damage in insect wings: structural design versus embedded elastic materials.

Authors:  Andrew M Mountcastle; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Locomotor behaviour of children while navigating through apertures.

Authors:  Kate Wilmut; Anna L Barnett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Drosophila Acquires a Long-Lasting Body-Size Memory from Visual Feedback.

Authors:  Tammo Krause; Laura Spindler; Burkhard Poeck; Roland Strauss
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 10.834

4.  Arboreal clambering and the evolution of self-conception.

Authors:  D J Povinelli; J G Cant
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.875

5.  Perceiving affordances: visual guidance of stair climbing.

Authors:  W H Warren
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Preferred viewing directions of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.) when learning and approaching their nest site.

Authors:  Natalie Hempel de Ibarra; Andrew Philippides; Olena Riabinina; Thomas S Collett
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 7.  Honey bees as a model for vision, perception, and cognition.

Authors:  Mandyam V Srinivasan
Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 19.686

Review 8.  Motion as a source of environmental information: a fresh view on biological motion computation by insect brains.

Authors:  Martin Egelhaaf; Roland Kern; Jens Peter Lindemann
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  Elephants know when their bodies are obstacles to success in a novel transfer task.

Authors:  Rachel Dale; Joshua M Plotnik
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Bumblebees minimize control challenges by combining active and passive modes in unsteady winds.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Dmitry Kolomenskiy; Thomas Engels; Kai Schneider; Chun Wang; Jörn Sesterhenn; Hao Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  6 in total

1.  Discrimination of edge orientation by bumblebees.

Authors:  Marie Guiraud; Mark Roper; Stephan Wolf; Joseph L Woodgate; Lars Chittka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Bumblebees display characteristics of active vision during robust obstacle avoidance flight.

Authors:  Sridhar Ravi; Tim Siesenop; Olivier J Bertrand; Liang Li; Charlotte Doussot; Alex Fisher; William H Warren; Martin Egelhaaf
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Gap affordance judgments in bumblebees: Same as humans?

Authors:  Martin Giurfa; Marion Luyat
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Information Is Where You Find It: Perception as an Ecologically Well-Posed Problem.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2021-03-22

Review 5.  Ecological Entomology: How Is Gibson's Framework Useful?

Authors:  Aimie Berger Dauxère; Julien R Serres; Gilles Montagne
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 2.769

6.  Wind and route choice affect performance of bees flying above versus within a cluttered obstacle field.

Authors:  Nicholas P Burnett; Marc A Badger; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.