| Literature DB >> 30682082 |
Gentaro Kumagai1, Kanichiro Wada1, Hitoshi Kudo1, Toru Asari1, Daisuke Chiba1, Seiya Ota1, On Takeda1, Kazushige Koyama1, Shigeyuki Nakaji2, Yasuyuki Ishibashi1.
Abstract
The physical and biochemical factors related to cervical disc degeneration (CDD), which is involved in several spinal disorders, remain uncertain. We investigated associations between CDD and muscle strength in a general Japanese population. We used mid-sagittal-plane MRIs to assess CDD in 344 subjects recruited from participants in our community health-check project, and measured body mass index (BMI), skeletal muscle index (SMI), and muscle strength in the neck, trunk, hands, and legs. CDD was scored based on the prevalence and severity of intravertebral disc degeneration. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to evaluate whether the SMI or muscle-strength values were correlated with the disc degenerative score. Stepwise multiple linear regression analyses were then conducted with the CDD score as the dependent variable, and age, sex, BMI, and muscle strength as independent variables, for each gender. These analyses used the muscle-strength parameters that were found to be correlated with the CDD scores in the single correlation analyses. The CDD scores were similar in men and women. Men had significantly more muscle strength in the neck, trunk, hands, and legs. There was a significant negative corelation between the CDD score and the trunk strength in both sexes, handgrip in men, and leg strength in women in the single-variable correlation analysis. Including age and the limb- or trunk-muscle strength comprehensively, multiple linear regression analyses showed that age was the strongest factor that was independently associated with CDD in both sexes, and that the effects were attenuated by limb and trunk muscle strength.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30682082 PMCID: PMC6347163 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210802
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics, degenerative score, and muscle strength of study participants.
| Men ( | Women ( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 54.3 ± 15.1 | 55.6 ± 14.6 | .432 | ||
| 20–39 | 30 | 38 | |||
| 40–59 | 60 | 68 | |||
| 60–79 | 59 | 82 | |||
| 80–99 | 2 | 5 | |||
| Current Smoker, | 33 (21.9) | 18 (9.3) | < .0001# | ||
| Exercises regularly, | 37 (24.5) | 47 (24.4) | .916 | ||
| BMI | 23.9 ± 3.3 | 22.3 ± 3.3 | < .001* | ||
| SMI | 18.9 ± 1.6 | 15.4 ± 1.5 | < .001* | ||
| Degenerative score | 8.4 ± 3.5 | 8.1 ± 3.4 | .509 | ||
| Neck strength | ( | ( | |||
| 1.2 ± 0.4 | 0.9 ± 0.5 | < .0001* | |||
| 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.7 | .003* | |||
| Trunk strength | ( | ( | |||
| 2.1 ± 0.7 | 1.6 ± 0.6 | < .0001* | |||
| 5.2 ± 1.3 | 3.5 ± 1.2 | < .0001* | |||
| Handgrip strength | ( | ( | |||
| 40.5 ± 8.0 | 23.8 ± 4.7 | < .0001* | |||
| 38.8 ± 7.9 | 23.0 ± 4.6 | < .0001* | |||
| Leg strength | ( | ( | |||
| 1.5 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | < .0001* | |||
| 2.8 ± 0.8 | 2.0 ± 0.5 | < .0001* | |||
BMI, body mass index. SMI, skeletal muscle index.
aMean ± S.D.
bSignificant differences (P < .05) between values for men and women were calculated by *Mann-Whitney U or #Chi-square test.
Relationships between degenerative score and muscle strength.
| Partial correlation coefficient: | Degenerative score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.637 | < .0001* | 151 | |
| SMI, kg/m2 | −0.06 | .935 | 151 | |
| Neck strength, kg | ||||
| 0.102 | .214 | 151 | ||
| -0.040 | .629 | 151 | ||
| Trunk strength, Nm/kg | ||||
| −0.247 | .006* | 125 | ||
| −0.011 | .903 | 126 | ||
| Handgrip strength, kg | ||||
| −0.178 | .046* | 127 | ||
| −0.254 | .004* | 127 | ||
| Leg strength, Nm/kg | ||||
| −0.177 | .054 | 119 | ||
| −0.158 | .087 | 119 | ||
| Age | 0.683 | < .0001* | 193 | |
| SMI, kg/m2 | 0.233 | .001* | 193 | |
| Neck strength, kg | ||||
| -0.048 | .510 | 190 | ||
| -0.021 | .776 | 190 | ||
| Trunk strength, Nm/kg | ||||
| −0.272 | .001* | 158 | ||
| -0.051 | 0.523 | 157 | ||
| Handgrip strength, kg | ||||
| −0.169 | .032 | 162 | ||
| −0.152 | .054 | 162 | ||
| Leg strength, Nm/kg | ||||
| −0.343 | < .0001* | 148 | ||
| −0.190 | .020* | 150 | ||
SMI: Skeletal muscle index. r = correlation coefficient. The relationship between degenerative score for Age, SMI and muscle strength were analyzed by Spearman’s rank partial correlation analysis. P-Values below 0.05* indicate significance.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis relative to degenerative score.
| Logistic regression (degenerative score) | B | β | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.179 | 0.802 | 0.139 to 0.218 | < .0001 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.106 | 0.107 | -0.065 to 0.276 | 0.222 | |
| Trunk strength, Nm/kg | |||||
| 0.460 | 0.098 | -0.334 to 1.255 | 0.253 | ||
| Handgrip strength, kg | |||||
| 0.047 | 0.113 | -0.054 to 0.147 | 0.360 | ||
| -0.082 | -0.192 | -0.183 to 0.020 | 0.114 | ||
| Age | 0.162 | 0.704 | 0.128 to 0.196 | < .0001 | |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.095 | 0.089 | -0.066 to 0.256 | 0.247 | |
| Trunk strength, Nm/kg | |||||
| 0.012 | 0.002 | -0.763 to 0.786 | 0.977 | ||
| Leg strength, Nm/kg | |||||
| -0.033 | -0.003 | -2.092 to 2.026 | 0.975 | ||
| 0.292 | 0.048 | -0.762 to 1.345 | 0.585 | ||
B, regression coefficient; β, standardized regression coefficient; r2, coefficient of determination (adjusted).
aStepwise multiple regression analysis was performed by gender using the degenerative score as the dependent variable and age, BMI, and muscle strength as independent variables. The muscle-strength parameters were those found to be correlated with the degenerative score in the single correlation analysis (trunk flexion and handgrip in men, and trunk flexion and leg strength in women).