Literature DB >> 30679026

Impact of Sex on Chemotherapy Toxicity and Efficacy Among Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Pooled Analysis of 5 Randomized Trials.

Omar Abdel-Rahman1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of sex on toxicity and efficacy outcomes among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line 5-fluorouracil-based regimens. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A pooled analysis of data sets from 5 clinical trials (NCT00115765, NCT00364013, NCT00272051, NCT00305188, NCT00384176) was performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank testing were used to assess the differences in overall and progression-free survival between male and female subjects. Chi-square testing was used to examine the differences in the incidence of different toxicities between male and female subjects. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted for age, body mass index, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, race, bevacizumab-containing treatment, and panitumumab-containing treatment) was further utilized to assess the impact of gender on different toxicities. Most of the patients were treated with FOLFOX (folinic acid, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin)-based regimens.
RESULTS: A total of 3223 participants were included in the pooled cohort, among which were 1925 male and 1298 female subjects. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank testing were utilized to compare overall and progression-free survival outcomes between male and female subjects. For both end points, there was no difference between male and female subjects (P = .884; P = .647, respectively). Comparing female to male subjects, female subjects were more likely to experience alopecia (20% vs. 8.6%; P < .001), all-grade diarrhea (60.3% vs. 56.7%; P = .039), all-grade nausea and vomiting (68.7% vs. 56.6%; P < .001), high-grade nausea and vomiting (7.1% vs. 4.5%; P = .002), all-grade anemia (19.6% vs. 14.2%; P < .001), all-grade neutropenia (51.1% vs. 36.6%; P < .001), and high-grade neutropenia (37.1% vs. 24.1%; P < .001). These differences were further confirmed in multivariate logistic regression analyses.
CONCLUSION: Female subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy demonstrated higher rates of a number of toxicities (essentially hematologic and gastrointestinal in nature). Additional studies into the differential effect of systemic therapy on female versus male subjects are needed.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  5-FU; Adverse events; Female; Male; Survival

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30679026     DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2018.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer        ISSN: 1533-0028            Impact factor:   4.481


  9 in total

1.  ECOG performance score 0 versus 1: impact on efficacy and safety of first-line 5-FU-based chemotherapy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer included in five randomized trials.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  A real-world, population-based study of the outcomes of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer to the peritoneum treated with or without cytoreductive surgery.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Impact of age on toxicity and efficacy of 5-FU-based combination chemotherapy among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer; a pooled analysis of five randomized trials.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Rahman; Hatim Karachiwala
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  A Real-World, Population-Based Analysis of the Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer Patients with Isolated Synchronous Liver or Lung Metastases Treated with Metastasectomy.

Authors:  Hani Oweira; Arianeb Mehrabi; Christoph Reissfelder; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Expected and paradoxical effects of obesity on cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Marco Gallo; Valerio Adinolfi; Viola Barucca; Natalie Prinzi; Valerio Renzelli; Luigi Barrea; Paola Di Giacinto; Rosaria Maddalena Ruggeri; Franz Sesti; Emanuela Arvat; Roberto Baldelli; Emanuela Arvat; Annamaria Colao; Andrea Isidori; Andrea Lenzi; Roberto Baldell; M Albertelli; D Attala; A Bianchi; A Di Sarno; T Feola; G Mazziotti; A Nervo; C Pozza; G Puliani; P Razzore; S Ramponi; S Ricciardi; L Rizza; F Rota; E Sbardella; M C Zatelli
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 6.514

6.  Sex- and Gender-Based Pharmacological Response to Drugs.

Authors:  Franck Mauvais-Jarvis; Heiner K Berthold; Ilaria Campesi; Juan-Jesus Carrero; Santosh Dakal; Flavia Franconi; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold; Mark L Heiman; Alexandra Kautzky-Willer; Sabra L Klein; Anne Murphy; Vera Regitz-Zagrosek; Karen Reue; Joshua B Rubin
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 25.468

7.  Lurbinectedin-induced thrombocytopenia: the role of body surface area.

Authors:  Apostolos Papachristos; Mark J Ratain
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.288

Review 8.  Individualized Dosing of Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy to Prevent Severe Fluoropyrimidine-Related Toxicity: What Are the Options?

Authors:  Jonathan E Knikman; Hans Gelderblom; Jos H Beijnen; Annemieke Cats; Henk-Jan Guchelaar; Linda M Henricks
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  Risk Factors for Infections, Antibiotic Therapy, and Its Impact on Cancer Therapy Outcomes for Patients with Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Ondřej Kubeček; Pavla Paterová; Martina Novosadová
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.