| Literature DB >> 30678712 |
Félicité Flore Djuikwo-Teukeng1, Alain Kouam Simo1, Jean-François Allienne2, Olivier Rey2, Arouna Njayou Ngapagna1, Louis Albert Tchuem-Tchuente3,4, Jérôme Boissier5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Schistosomiasis is neglected tropical parasitic disease affecting both humans and animals. Due to the human health impact, population genetic studies have focused on the three main human-infecting schistosome species: Schistosoma mansoni, S. haematobium and S. japonicum. Here we present novel data on the population genetic structure of Schistosoma bovis, a highly widespread and prevalent schistosome infecting ruminants, and therefore of veterinary importance.Entities:
Keywords: Barcoding; Population genetic structure; Schistosoma bovis
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678712 PMCID: PMC6346511 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-019-3307-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Parasit Vectors ISSN: 1756-3305 Impact factor: 3.876
Fig. 1Map of the areas from where the cows originated: Maroua, Garoua, Ngaoundéré and Bertoua. The different proportions of cattle breeding in each area are shown as a percentage [35]
The number of cows inspected, the prevalence of schistosomiasis and the numbers of schistosomes recovered from the 22 cows sampled from the four areas of Cameroon included in the study
| Origin of the cattle | No. of animals inspected | No. of positive animals | Prevalence of infection (%) | No. of animals sampled | No. of male/No. of female schistosomes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ngaoundéré | 70 | 23 | 13.5 | 7 | 36/34 |
| Maroua | 130 | 28 | 21.5 | 5 | 24/25 |
| Bertoua | 40 | 15 | 37.5 | 3 | 13/15 |
| Garoua | 140 | 28 | 20.0 | 7 | 38/33 |
| Total | 480 | 94 | 19.5 | 22 | 111/107 |
Heterozygosity (He), number of alleles (A), allelic richness (Ar) and Fis for each microsattelite locus in each of the four schistosome populations studied. Allelic richness is based on a minimum of 24 diploid individuals
| Loci | Ngaoundéré ( | Bertoua ( | Maroua ( | Garoua ( | All populations ( | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| He | A | Ar | F | He | A | Ar | F | He | A | Ar | F | He | A | Ar | F | He | A | Ar | |
| Sh9 | 0.90 | 19 | 14.62 | 0.54 | 0.90 | 13 | 12.67 | 0.53 | 0.85 | 15 | 12.88 | 0.64 | 0.86 | 13 | 11.62 | 0.44 | 0.88 | 21 | 13.80 |
| Sh3 | 0.94 | 22 | 17.82 | 0.00 | 0.95 | 20 | 19.33 | -0.05 | 0.94 | 22 | 18.37 | 0.05 | 0.95 | 24 | 18.81 | 0.02 | 0.95 | 27 | 18.71 |
| C102 | 0.53 | 9 | 6.24 | 0.24 | 0.35 | 3 | 2.86 | 0.19 | 0.54 | 7 | 5.69 | 0.34 | 0.49 | 6 | 4.18 | 0.19 | 0.48 | 11 | 5.41 |
| Sh1 | 0.89 | 15 | 12.25 | 0.00 | 0.87 | 11 | 10.67 | 0.05 | 0.86 | 14 | 11.05 | 0.03 | 0.83 | 12 | 10.22 | 0.02 | 0.86 | 16 | 10.94 |
| Sh14 | 0.83 | 15 | 10.76 | 0.00 | 0.86 | 13 | 12.10 | 0.21 | 0.77 | 13 | 10.06 | 0.02 | 0.83 | 15 | 10.99 | 0.09 | 0.82 | 21 | 10.74 |
| Sh6 | 0.87 | 13 | 10.32 | 0.36 | 0.88 | 11 | 10.80 | 0.44 | 0.86 | 11 | 9.32 | 0.36 | 0.86 | 12 | 9.51 | 0.44 | 0.87 | 13 | 9.88 |
| C111 | 0.49 | 4 | 2.97 | 0.63 | 0.55 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.39 | 0.48 | 5 | 4.19 | 0.46 | 0.47 | 2 | 2.00 | 0.36 | 0.50 | 6 | 3.15 |
| Sh13 | 0.94 | 19 | 16.37 | 0.06 | 0.89 | 16 | 15.21 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 20 | 16.21 | -0.02 | 0.93 | 20 | 15.92 | -0.01 | 0.92 | 23 | 16.06 |
| Sh4 | 0.92 | 18 | 14.76 | 0.07 | 0.90 | 11 | 10.83 | 0.08 | 0.92 | 16 | 14.01 | 0.00 | 0.92 | 18 | 14.26 | 0.02 | 0.91 | 19 | 14.23 |
| Sh11 | 0.69 | 6 | 5.81 | 0.27 | 0.73 | 6 | 5.84 | 0.02 | 0.69 | 6 | 5.47 | 0.14 | 0.72 | 8 | 6.44 | 0.09 | 0.71 | 8 | 5.97 |
| Sh15 | 0.25 | 3 | 2.83 | 0.11 | 0.34 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.05 | 0.26 | 3 | 2.87 | 0.12 | 0.32 | 3 | 2.82 | 0.09 | 0.29 | 3 | 2.84 |
| Sh2 | 0.92 | 18 | 14.35 | 0.04 | 0.92 | 15 | 14.39 | -0.09 | 0.92 | 17 | 14.68 | -0.02 | 0.91 | 20 | 14.14 | -0.05 | 0.92 | 23 | 14.19 |
| Sh5 | 0.84 | 12 | 10.00 | 0.23 | 0.86 | 12 | 11.40 | 0.21 | 0.85 | 12 | 10.65 | 0.36 | 0.81 | 13 | 10.12 | 0.29 | 0.84 | 15 | 10.41 |
| Sh12 | 0.60 | 5 | 4.23 | 0.19 | 0.51 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.29 | 0.55 | 3 | 3.00 | 0.37 | 0.56 | 5 | 3.88 | 0.36 | 0.56 | 6 | 3.83 |
| Mean | 0.76 | 12.71 | 10.24 | 0.20 | 0.75 | 10.00 | 9.65 | 0.17 | 0.74 | 11.71 | 9.89 | 0.20 | 0.75 | 12.21 | 9.64 | 0.17 | 0.75 | 15.14 | 10.01 |
| SE | 0.06 | 1.76 | 1.41 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.53 | 1.46 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 1.70 | 1.40 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 1.88 | 1.44 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 2.09 | 1.41 |
Abbreviation: SE standard error
Analysis of the molecular variance within and among the S. bovis populations using cox1 and microsatellite data. The sum of squares is the sum of squared differences of each observation from the mean. Variance component estimates the contribution of the source of the variation to the variance
| Genetic marker |
| Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among population | 3 | 2.599 | 0.01147 | 2.36 |
| Among animals within population | 18 | 10.904 | 0.04276 | 8.81 |
| Within animals | 69 | 29.750 | 0.43116 | 88.83 |
| Total | 90 | 43.253 | 0.48538 | |
| Microsatellite analysis | ||||
| Among populations | 3 | 20.779 | 0.00239 | 0.05 |
| Among animals within population | 18 | 12.239 | 0.09253 | 1.86 |
| Within animals | 408 | 1987.705 | 4.87182 | 98.09 |
| Total | 429 | 2128.723 | 4.96674 | |
Abbreviation: df degrees of freedom
Fig. 2Structure bar plots obtained showing the lack of population structure of S. bovis from the 4 sampling areas in Cameroon for K = 2 and K = 4
Pairwise estimates of Fst values (below the diagonal) of S. bovis parasite populations based on microsatellite DNA genotypes
| Ngaoundéré | Bertoua | Maroua | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ngaoundéré |
| ns | ns |
| Bertoua | 0.0048 |
| ns |
| Maroua | 0.0012 | 0.0043 |
|
| Garoua | 0.0019 | 0.0002 | 0.0017 |
Abbreviation: ns no statistically significant differences at the P < 0.05 level
Fig. 3Principal components analysis (PCA) plot. Each parasite is represented by a dot and the color label corresponds to their population origin. A total of 28 variables (14 microsatellites × 2 alleles) were used in the analysis. The first and the second axis explained 38.77% and 32.29% of the genetic variation, respectively
Allelic richness and genetic diversity for S. haematobium and S. bovis. Indices for S. haematobium are from Webster et al. [22]. Indices for S. bovis are from the present study. Allelic richness is based on 50 diploid individuals
| Locus | Allelic richness | Gene diversity (%) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Niger | Zanzibar | Cameroon | Niger | Zanzibar | Cameroon | |
| Sh9 | 6.0 | 9.0 | 16.90 | 77 | 87 | 88 |
| Sh3 | 14.0 | 13.0 | 22.39 | 87 | 87 | 95 |
| C102 | 5.0 | 2.0 | 7.26 | 37 | 2 | 50 |
| Sh1 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 12.86 | 73 | 81 | 86 |
| Sh14 | 11.0 | 13.0 | 13.89 | 86 | 89 | 83 |
| Sh6 | 5.0 | 8.0 | 11.53 | 45 | 76 | 86 |
| C111 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 4.05 | 68 | 69 | 49 |
| Sh13 | 12.0 | 13.0 | 18.89 | 72 | 65 | 93 |
| Sh4 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 16.59 | 79 | 80 | 92 |
| Sh11 | 6.0 | 6.0 | 6.45 | 59 | 69 | 70 |
| Sh15 | 5.0 | 7.0 | 2.98 | 66 | 47 | 28 |
| Sh2 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 17.15 | 91 | 90 | 91 |
| Sh5 | 12.0 | 7.0 | 12.32 | 82 | 48 | 83 |
| Sh12 | 3.0 | 6.0 | 4.51 | 6 | 66 | 57 |
| Mean | 8.42 | 8.86 | 11.98 | 66 | 68 | 75 |
| SE | 1.06 | 1.0 | 1.63 | 6 | 6 | 6 |
Abbreviation: SE standard error
Number of haplotypes, haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity of the cox1 sequences from S. bovis sampled at the four sites in Cameroon
| Area of origin | No. of haplotypes/no. of sequences | Haplotype diversity | Nucleotide diversity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ngaoundéré | 28/33 | 0.985 ± 0.014 | 0.00718 ± 0.00067 |
| Maroua | 12/20 | 0.847 ± 0.079 | 0.00407 ± 0.00077 |
| Bertoua | 9/12 | 0.909 ± 0.079 | 0.00451 ± 0.00129 |
| Garoua | 19/26 | 0.948 ± 0.034 | 0.00621 ± 0.00076 |
| All | 68/91 | 0.961 ± 0.012 | 0.00602 ± 0.00043 |