| Literature DB >> 30678175 |
Masresha Tessema1,2,3, Hugo De Groote4, Inge D Brouwer5, Edith J M Feskens6, Tefera Belachew7, Dilnesaw Zerfu8, Adamu Belay9, Yoseph Demelash10, Nilupa S Gunaratna11.
Abstract
To our knowledge, the relationships among soil zinc, serum zinc and children's linear growth have not been studied geographically or at a national level in any country. We use data from the cross-sectional, nationally representative Ethiopian National Micronutrient Survey (ENMS) (n = 1776), which provided anthropometric and serum zinc (n = 1171) data on children aged 6⁻59 months. Soil zinc levels were extracted for each child from the digital soil map of Ethiopia, developed by the Africa Soil Information Service. Children's linear growth was computed using length/height and age converted into Z-scores for height-for-age. Multi-level mixed linear regression models were used for the analysis. Nationally, 28% of children aged 6⁻59 months were zinc deficient (24% when adjusted for inflammation) and 38% were stunted. Twenty percent of households in the ENMS were located on zinc-deficient soils. Soil zinc (in mg/kg) was positively associated with serum zinc (in µg/dL) (b = 0.9, p = 0.020) and weight-for-height-Z-score (b = 0.05, p = 0.045) but linear growth was not associated with soil zinc (p = 0.604) or serum zinc (p = 0.506) among Ethiopian preschool children. Intervention studies are needed to determine whether there are causal links between soil and human zinc status.Entities:
Keywords: Ethiopia; linear growth; preschool children; serum zinc; soil fertility; soil zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678175 PMCID: PMC6413067 DOI: 10.3390/nu11020221
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1A conceptual framework describing the relationships among soil zinc, serum zinc status and linear growth of children (based on a framework to achieve optimum child nutrition and development from Black et al [26]).
Characteristics of study participants (children under five years) from the Ethiopian National Micronutrient Survey (ENMS).
| Indicators |
| Median (25th, 75th Percentiles) or % |
|---|---|---|
| Age in months | 1776 | 36 (24, 48) |
| Age categories | ||
| Age (6–11 months) | 118 | 7% |
| Age (12–23 months) | 288 | 16% |
| Age (24–59 months) | 1370 | 77% |
| Sex (female) | 1776 | 48% |
| Child had diarrhoea in preceding two weeks | 1776 | 15% |
| Child received medication during the diarrheal episode | 1776 | 5% |
| Child consumed meat or meat products in the last 24 h | 1776 | 11% |
| Unadjusted serum zinc (μg/dL) | 1171 | 74.1 (63.4, 87.4) |
| AGP (g/L) | 1180 | 0.95 (0.75, 1.20) |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1164 | 0.64 (0.25, 2.20) |
Prevalence and geographical distribution of soil zinc deficiency, child serum zinc deficiency and child stunting in Ethiopia by region.
| Percentage of Households on Zinc-Deficient Soils (<1.5 mg/kg), | Prevalence Serum Zinc Deficiency 1 (<65 μg/dL), | Prevalence of Stunting (HAZ < −2.0), | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | Adjusted 2,3 | |||
|
| ||||
| Tigray | 50 | 36 | 29 | 44 |
| Afar | 87 | 40 | 34 | 31 |
| Amhara | 25 | 30 | 28 | 42 |
| Oromia | 17 | 25 | 22 | 35 |
| Somali | 33 | 24 | 22 | 36 |
| Benishangul | 15 | 20 | 16 | 36 |
| SNNPR | 2 | 29 | 22 | 37 |
| Gambella | 42 | 13 | 11 | 21 |
| Harari | 46 | 32 | 28 | 29 |
| Addis Ababa | 25 | 60 | 60 | 16 |
| Dire Dawa | 20 | 29 | 29 | 32 |
|
| ||||
| Age (6–11 months) | 31 | 28 | 20 | 6 |
|
| ||||
| Boys | 20 | 26 | 23 | 41 |
| Girls | 20 | 29 | 25 | 34 |
|
| ||||
| Urban | 24 | 32 | 25 | 26 |
| Rural | 20 | 27 | 24 | 39 |
|
| 20 | 28 | 24 | 38 |
1 All subjects were non-fasting. 2 BRINDA internal regression correction approach, which accounts for both CRP and AGP, was applied to calculate the adjusted prevalence of zinc deficiency [32]. 3 Adjusted for inflammation = exp(unadjusted ln serum zinc−(regression coefficient for CRP) × (CRP− (maximum of lowest decile for CRP))−(regression coefficient for AGP) × (AGP−(maximum of lowest decile for AGP))). 4 Prevalence of soil zinc deficiency, serum zinc deficiency and stunting was weighted using a regional weight factor.
Figure 2Geographical distribution of poor soil zinc, poor serum zinc status and poor linear growth of children in Ethiopia. NMS=National Micronutrient Survey; EAs = Enumeration Areas; Serum zinc deficiency (%) = Percent of under-five children who are deficient as measured by serum zinc; CU5s = children under five.
Spearman’s rank correlations between soil zinc, serum zinc, inflammation biomarkers child’s growth, incidence of diarrhoea in children and household food insecurity.
| Indicators | Soil Zinc | Serum Zinc | AGP | CRP | HAZ | WHZ | Diarrhoea |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Serum zinc (µg/dL) | 0.09 ** | ||||||
| AGP (g/L) 1 | 0.12 ** | −0.08 * | |||||
| CRP (mg/L) 2 | 0.07 * | -0.05 | 0.55 ** | ||||
| HAZ 3 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.02 | −0.03 | |||
| WHZ 4 | 0.08 ** | 0.02 | −0.01 | −0.0006 | −0.05 * | ||
| Diarrhoea | 0.06 ** | −0.05 | 0.08** | −0.001 | −0.01 | −0.07 ** | |
| FIES 5 | −0.03 | 0.0001 | 0.04 | −0.02 | −0.02 | −0.07 * | 0.09 ** |
*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01. 1 AGP = α-1-glycoprotein protein concentration. 2 CRP = C-reactive protein concentration. 3 HAZ = Height-for-age Z-score. 4 WHZ= Weight-for-height-Z-score. 5 FIES = The Food Insecurity Experience Scale.
Multi-level mixed linear regression model predicting serum zinc (n = 1171).
| Fixed Effects | Estimate 1 | SE |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Soil zinc (mg/kg) | 0.9 | 0.4 | 0.020 |
| Diarrhoea in past two weeks | −1.9 | 1.8 | 0.284 |
| CRP (mg/L) and AGP (g/L) (ref = normal) | |||
| Elevated CRP only (mg /L) | −4.4 | 6.5 | 0.503 |
| Elevated AGP only (g/L) | −4.1 | 1.4 | 0.003 |
| Elevated AGP (g/L) and CRP (mg/L) | −6.8 | 2.0 | 0.0008 |
| Age in months (Ref = 6–11 months) | |||
| Age category 2 (12–23 months) | −1.5 | 3.5 | 0.655 |
| Age category 3 (24–59 months) | −1.2 | 3.1 | 0.702 |
| Sex of child (female) | −1.9 | 1.2 | 0.127 |
| Wealth status (Ref = wealthier) | |||
| Wealth status (poorer) | 1.8 | 1.8 | 0.301 |
| Wealth status (medium) | 2.6 | 1.6 | 0.111 |
| Time since most recent meal (hr) | −6.3 | 3.3 | 0.057 |
| FIES 2 | −0.1 | 0.2 | 0.693 |
| Consumption of meat or meat products in the last 24 h | −3.0 | 2.0 | 0.136 |
|
| |||
| Intercept (cluster) | 29.7 | 11.5 | 0.0049 |
1 Models adjusted for regions as fixed effects. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method was used to estimate the parameters. 2 FIES = The Food Insecurity Experience Scale.
Multi-level mixed linear regression models predicting height-for-age Z-score 1 (n = 1673).
| Model 1 2 | Model 2 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Effects | Estimate | SE |
| Estimate | SE |
|
| Soil zinc (mg/kg) | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.6035 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.522 |
| Serum zinc (μg/dL) | −0.002 | 0.003 | 0.506 | |||
| Diarrhoea in past two weeks | −0.30 | 0.16 | 0.0654 | −0.3 | 0.2 | 0.091 |
| CRP (mg/L) and AGP (g/L) (Ref = normal) | ||||||
| Elevated CRP only (mg/L) | 0.01 | 0.57 | 0.9842 | −0.11 | 0.60 | 0.848 |
| Elevated AGP only (g/L) | −0.09 | 0.13 | 0.4751 | −0.04 | 0.13 | 0.753 |
| Elevated CRP (mg/L) and AGP (g/L) | −0.10 | 0.18 | 0.5839 | −0.05 | 0.19 | 0.781 |
| Age in months (Ref = 6–11 months) | ||||||
| Age category 2 (12–23 months) | −0.40 | 0.3 | 0.199 | −38 | 0.32 | 0.235 |
| Age category 3 (24–59 months) | −1.1 | 0.3 | <0.0001 | −1.1 | 0.28 | <0.0001 |
| Sex (female) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.054 | 0.2 | 0.12 | 0.036 |
| Wealth status (Ref = wealthier) | ||||||
| Wealth status (poorer) | −0.2 | 0.2 | 0.214 | −0.13 | 0.16 | 0.435 |
| Wealth status (medium) | −0.2 | 0.1 | 0.269 | −0.11 | 0.15 | 0.451 |
| FIES 3 | −0.02 | 0.02 | 0.286 | −0.03 | 0.02 | 0.175 |
|
| ||||||
| Intercept(cluster) | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.007 | 0.2 | 0.08 | 0.009 |
1 Models adjusted for regions as fixed effects. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method was used to estimate the parameters. 2 Model 1 adjusted for soil zinc, model 2 adjusted for soil zinc and serum zinc. 3 FIES = The Food Insecurity Experience Scale.
Multi-level mixed linear regression models predicting weight-for-height-Z-score1 (n = 1673).
| Model 1 2 | Model 2 2 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fixed Effects | Estimate | SE |
| Estimate | SE |
|
| Soil zinc (mg/kg) | 0.05 | 0.02 | 0.026 | 0.05 | 0.023 | 0.045 |
| Serum zinc (μg/dL) | 0.002 | 0.002 | 0.488 | |||
| Diarrhoea in past two weeks | −0.16 | 0.12 | 0.162 | −0.184 | 0.118 | 0.121 |
| CRP (mg/L) and AGP (g/L) (Ref = normal) | ||||||
| Elevated CRP only (mg/L) | −0.14 | 0.40 | 0.737 | −0.104 | 0.426 | 0.808 |
| Elevated AGP only (g/L) | 0.04 | 0.09 | 0.694 | 0.037 | 0.093 | 0.687 |
| Elevated CRP (mg/L) and AGP (g/L) | −0.01 | 0.13 | 0.916 | −0.0002 | 0.134 | 0.999 |
| Age in months (Ref = 6–11 months) | ||||||
| Age category 2(12–23 months) | −0.04 | 0.23 | 0.846 | −0.020 | 0.228 | 0.931 |
| Age category 3 (24–59 months) | 0.07 | 0.20 | 0.734 | 0.044 | 0.201 | 0.827 |
| Sex (female) | −0.03 | 0.08 | 0.717 | −0.031 | 0.082 | 0.704 |
| Wealth status (Ref = wealthier) | ||||||
| Wealth status (poorer) | −0.40 | 0.11 | 0.001 | −0.434 | 0.117 | 0.0002 |
| Wealth status (medium) | −0.09 | 0.10 | 0.366 | −0.141 | 0.107 | 0.187 |
| FIES 3 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.703 | 0.008 | 0.015 | 0.604 |
|
| ||||||
| Intercept(cluster) | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.005 | 0.124 | 0.048 | 0.005 |
1 Models adjusted for regions as fixed effects. The restricted maximum likelihood (REML) method was used to estimate the parameters. 2 Model 1 adjusted for soil zinc, model 2 adjusted for soil zinc and serum zinc. 3 FIES = The Food Insecurity Experience Scale.