| Literature DB >> 30678100 |
Zi-Shu Lu1, Qian-Si Chen2, Qing-Xia Zheng3, Juan-Juan Shen4, Zhao-Peng Luo5, Kai Fan6, Sheng-Hao Xu7, Qi Shen8, Ping-Ping Liu9.
Abstract
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) is a common source of biological stress that significantly affects plant growth and development. It is also useful as a model in studies designed to clarify the mechanisms involved in plant viral disease. Plant responses to abiotic stress were recently reported to be regulated by complex mechanisms at the post-translational modification (PTM) level. Protein phosphorylation is one of the most widespread and major PTMs in organisms. Using immobilized metal ion affinity chromatography (IMAC) enrichment, high-pH C18 chromatography fraction, and high-accuracy mass spectrometry (MS), a set of proteins and phosphopeptides in both TMV-infected tobacco and control tobacco were identified. A total of 4905 proteins and 3998 phosphopeptides with 3063 phosphorylation sites were identified. These 3998 phosphopeptides were assigned to 1311 phosphoproteins, as some proteins carried multiple phosphorylation sites. Among them, 530 proteins and 337 phosphopeptides corresponding to 277 phosphoproteins differed between the two groups. There were 43 upregulated phosphoproteins, including phosphoglycerate kinase, pyruvate phosphate dikinase, protein phosphatase 2C, and serine/threonine protein kinase. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first phosphoproteomic analysis of leaves from a tobacco cultivar, K326. The results of this study advance our understanding of tobacco development and TMV action at the protein phosphorylation level.Entities:
Keywords: isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) labeling; nano-LC–MS/MS; phosphoproteomic; proteomic; tobacco; tobacco mosaic virus (TMV)
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678100 PMCID: PMC6406717 DOI: 10.3390/biom9020039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomolecules ISSN: 2218-273X
Figure 1Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) expression determined by qRT-PCR after 48 h of TMV infection.
Figure 2Overview of the identified proteins and phosphopeptides. (A) The numbers of identified proteins, phosphoproteins, phosphopeptides and phosphorylation sites (FDR <1%); (B) The distribution of the number of peptides defining each protein; (C) The numbers of phosphoserine (pS), phosphothreonine (pT) and phosphotyrosine (pY) residues in the phosphorylation sites.
Figure 3(A) Distribution of up-, mid-, and downregulated specifically expressed proteins (SEPs) in the identified proteins; (B) Distribution of up-, mid-, and downregulated significant changes in phosphorylation level (SCPL) proteins in the identified phosphoproteins.
Figure 4Hierarchical clustering of all of the differentially expressed protein (A) and phosphoprotein (B) profiles of tobacco leaves in control and TMV-infected plants.
Figure 5Gene ontology (GO) analysis of SEPs (A) and SCPL proteins (B). (A) The cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions of differentially expressed proteins in samples; (B) The cellular components, biological processes, and molecular functions of differentially expressed phosphoproteins in samples.
Figure 6Phosphorylation motifs extracted from the overrepresented phosphopeptide dataset by Motif-X. (A)–(D) Five enriched motifs from phosphoserine; (E) Enriched motif from phosphothreonine.
Figure 7Protein–protein interaction networks of some important phosphoproteins in five functional categories.