| Literature DB >> 30678028 |
Rachel L Washburn1, James E Cox2, Joseph B Muhlestein3, Heidi T May4, John F Carlquist5, Viet T Le6, Jeffrey L Anderson7, Benjamin D Horne8.
Abstract
Intermittent fasting (IF) has been connected with health benefits such as weight loss, lower risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and diabetes, increased longevity, and improved quality of life. However, the mechanisms of these IF benefits in humans require further investigation. This study sought to elucidate some of these mechanisms through secondary analyses of the Fasting and ExprEssion of Longevity Genes during fOOD abstinence (FEELGOOD) trial, in which apparently healthy participants were randomized in a Latin square design to a 24-h water-only fast and a 24-h ad libitum fed day. Two pathways were investigated, with trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) levels measured due to their association with elevated risk of CAD, along with conductance of a broad panel of metabolic analytes. Measurements were made at baseline, at the end of the fasting day, and at the end of the fed day. A fasting mean of 14.3 ng in TMAO was found versus the baseline mean of 27.1 ng with p = 0.019, although TMAO levels returned to baseline on refeeding. Further, acute alterations in levels of proline, tyrosine, galactitol, and urea plasma levels were observed along with changes in 24 other metabolites during the fasting period. These acute changes reveal short-term mechanisms which, with consistent repeated episodes of IF, may lead to improved health and reduced risk of CAD and diabetes.Entities:
Keywords: coronary artery disease; diabetes; intermittent energy restriction; intermittent fasting; metabolic analytes; trimethylamine N-oxide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30678028 PMCID: PMC6412259 DOI: 10.3390/nu11020246
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Figure 1Boxplot of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO) levels when fed at baseline upon completion of fasting day and upon completion of the fed day using 24-h values of TMAO. Comparing baseline to fasting (p = 0.049) and fed to fasting (p = 0.019) showed significance, but the comparison of baseline to fed (p = 0.93) did not show significance.
Figure 2Boxplot comparing TMAO change on the 24-h fasting day versus the 24-h fed day. Fasting mean was −10.8 ng and fed mean was +2.6 ng (p = 0.25).
Figure 3Boxplots displaying the similarity of TMAO changes for the group that fasted on the first day compared to those who fasted on the second day for the 24-h fasting period (p = 0.41) and for the 24-h fed day (p = 0.29).
Figure 4TMAO levels returned to the baseline level at 48 h after study start for those randomized to the group that fasted first, with baseline mean of 22.5 ng TMAO and 48-h mean (24 h after fasting completion) of 28.8 ng (p = 0.55).
Of the 74 metabolic analytes measured, 30 achieved suggestive significance at p ≤ 0.05, including four that had p < 0.000676 (Figure 5). Six fatty acids increased through fasting and 16 amino acids were reduced through fasting. Values for each metabolite are relative measures based on the internal standard as determined from the area under the curve.
| Metabolic Analyte | Baseline | Fasting Change | Fed Change | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyruvate | 39.2 ± 15.5 | −13.7 ± 21.7 | 3.7 ± 20.5 | 0.031 |
| Glycerol | 403 ± 118 | 155 ± 289 | −64 ± 282 | 0.046 |
| Lysine | 563 ± 215 | −204 ± 340 | 109 ± 360 | 0.023 |
| Valine | 2270 ± 579 | −497 ± 983 | 364 ± 954 | 0.017 |
| Isoleucine | 658 ± 182 | −201 ± 343 | 131 ± 384 | 0.019 |
| Threonine | 107 ± 33 | −31.8 ± 38.9 | 19.5 ± 46.0 | 0.003 |
| Glycine | 75.0 ± 23.6 | −12.0 ± 17.2 | 4.3 ± 18.7 | 0.012 |
| Alanine | 172 ± 39 | −56.4 ± 69.0 | 30.8 ± 64.9 | 0.0009 |
| Glutamic Acid | 29.7 ± 15.4 | −12.9 ± 22.2 | 5.4 ± 21.4 | 0.030 |
| Glutamine | 228 ± 50 | −39.2 ± 65.8 | 17.7 ± 55.5 | 0.009 |
| Proline | 2386 ± 751 | −1068 ± 932 | 494 ± 950 | 0.00002 |
| Aspartic Acid | 43.7 ± 19.3 | −16.1 ± 22.0 | 7.8 ± 18.5 | 0.002 |
| Methionine | 130 ± 45 | −50.1 ± 61.7 | 30.4 ± 67.5 | 0.002 |
| Phenylalanine | 251 ± 59 | −62.1 ± 92.0 | 25.5 ± 86.0 | 0.0111 |
| Tyrosine | 101 ± 31 | −43.3 ± 43.6 | 22.7 ± 46.9 | 0.0003 |
| Tryptophan | 535 ± 194 | −187 ± 221 | 70 ± 240 | 0.005 |
| Histidine | 46.8 ± 23.4 | −14.1 ± 25.6 | 6.4 ± 27.9 | 0.006 |
| Ornithine | 16.2 ± 6.4 | −5.66 ± 7.08 | 2.19 ± 8.14 | 0.006 |
| Phosphoglycerol | 44.9 ± 31.1 | −23.9 ± 27.0 | 6.6 ± 32.5 | 0.005 |
| Fructose | 166 ± 113 | −118 ± 182 | 61 ± 202 | 0.010 |
| Galactitol | 0.67 ± 0.71 | −0.72 ± 0.87 | 0.68 ± 1.47 | 0.00058 |
| Inositol | 225 ± 71 | -58.2 ± 66.0 | 29.4 ± 75.4 | 0.001 |
| Myoinositol Phosphate | 117 ± 34 | -36.9 ± 53.7 | 7.5 ± 57.1 | 0.030 |
| Lauric Acid | 21.3 ± 11.9 | 12.3 ± 27.4 | −8.8 ± 24.0 | 0.034 |
| Myristic Acid | 116 ± 64 | 71.1 ± 119 | −27.1 ± 94.5 | 0.012 |
| Palmitelaidic Acid | 12.9 ± 11.7 | 36.2 ± 48.8 | −10.5 ± 46.2 | 0.009 |
| Linoleic Acid | 167 ± 77 | 64.6 ± 147 | −19.1 ± 99.8 | 0.049 |
| Oleic Acid | 264 ± 174 | 418 ± 534 | −118 ± 481 | 0.004 |
| Elaidic Acid | 20.8 ± 17.2 | 32.8 ± 40.9 | −7.5 ± 38.2 | 0.004 |
| Urea | 3410 ± 1228 | −786 ± 1083 | 456 ± 880 | 0.0003 |
Figure 5After 24 h of the fasting intervention, reductions were noted in proline, tyrosine, urea, and galactitol as compared to the observed changes on the ad libitum fed day that were statistically significant when corrected for the 74 comparisons. (a) Proline achieved p = 0.00002. (b) Tyrosine achieved p = 0.00033. (c) Urea achieved p = 0.00034. (d) Galactitol achieved p = 0.00058. Displayed values are relative measures of each metabolite compared to the internal d4-succinate standard. The bottom of the box is the 25th percentile and the top is the 75th percentile of data, while the whiskers extend up to 1.5 times beyond the height of the box (if data points exist within that interval). Open circles represent outliers that are more than 3-fold greater or less than the height of the box (see panel b where most baseline values were tightly clustered in a small interval but three values were quite divergent).