Kayla Morel1, Kelsey Nichols2, Yvonne Nong1, Nalini Charles3, Sarah Price4, Elsie Taveras4, Roberta Goldman5, Jennifer A Woo Baidal6. 1. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics (K Morel, K Nichols, Y Nong, and JA Woo Baidal); Institute of Human Nutrition (K Morel and Y Nong), Columbia University Medical Center. 2. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics (K Morel, K Nichols, Y Nong, and JA Woo Baidal). 3. New York Presbyterian Hospital Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (N Charles), New York, NY. 4. Division of General Academic Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, MassGeneral Hospital for Children (S Price and E Taveras), Boston, Mass. 5. Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University (R Goldman), Pawtucket, RI. 6. Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics (K Morel, K Nichols, Y Nong, and JA Woo Baidal). Electronic address: jw3286@cumc.columbia.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Novel approaches to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption during the first 1000 days-pregnancy through age 2 years-are urgently needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine perceptions of SSB consumption and acceptability of potential intervention strategies to promote SSB avoidance in low-income families in the first 1000 days. METHODS: In this qualitative research, we performed semistructured, in-depth interviews of 25 women and 7 nutrition/health care providers. Eligible women were Women, Infants, and Children program-enrolled and pregnant or had an infant younger than age 2 years. Eligible providers cared for families during the first 1000 days. Using immersion-crystallization techniques, we examined perceptions, barriers, and facilitators related to avoidance of SSB consumption; acceptability of messages framed as positive gains or negative losses; and perceived influence on SSB consumption of various intervention modalities. RESULTS: Themes related to SSB consumption included parental confusion about healthy beverage recommendations and maternal feelings of lack of control over beverage choices due to pregnancy cravings and infant tastes. Themes surrounding message frames included negative health consequences of sugary drink consumption are strong motivators for behavior change; and savings and cost count, but are not top priority. Highly acceptable intervention strategies included use of images showing health consequences of SSB consumption, illustrations of sugar content at the point of purchase, and multimodal delivery of messages. CONCLUSIONS: Messages focused on infant health consequences and parental empowerment to evaluate and select healthier beverages based on sugar content should be tested in interventions to reduce SSB consumption in the first 1000 days.
BACKGROUND: Novel approaches to reduce sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption during the first 1000 days-pregnancy through age 2 years-are urgently needed. OBJECTIVE: To examine perceptions of SSB consumption and acceptability of potential intervention strategies to promote SSB avoidance in low-income families in the first 1000 days. METHODS: In this qualitative research, we performed semistructured, in-depth interviews of 25 women and 7 nutrition/health care providers. Eligible women were Women, Infants, and Children program-enrolled and pregnant or had an infant younger than age 2 years. Eligible providers cared for families during the first 1000 days. Using immersion-crystallization techniques, we examined perceptions, barriers, and facilitators related to avoidance of SSB consumption; acceptability of messages framed as positive gains or negative losses; and perceived influence on SSB consumption of various intervention modalities. RESULTS: Themes related to SSB consumption included parental confusion about healthy beverage recommendations and maternal feelings of lack of control over beverage choices due to pregnancy cravings and infant tastes. Themes surrounding message frames included negative health consequences of sugary drink consumption are strong motivators for behavior change; and savings and cost count, but are not top priority. Highly acceptable intervention strategies included use of images showing health consequences of SSB consumption, illustrations of sugar content at the point of purchase, and multimodal delivery of messages. CONCLUSIONS: Messages focused on infant health consequences and parental empowerment to evaluate and select healthier beverages based on sugar content should be tested in interventions to reduce SSB consumption in the first 1000 days.
Authors: Jennifer A Woo Baidal; Lindsey M Locks; Erika R Cheng; Tiffany L Blake-Lamb; Meghan E Perkins; Elsie M Taveras Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2016-02-22 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Gayathri Kumar; Stephen Onufrak; Deena Zytnick; Beverly Kingsley; Sohyun Park Journal: Public Health Nutr Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.022
Authors: Matthew W Gillman; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Silvia Fernandez-Barres; Ken Kleinman; Elsie M Taveras; Emily Oken Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2017-07-08 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: V Mazarello Paes; K Hesketh; C O'Malley; H Moore; C Summerbell; S Griffin; E M F van Sluijs; K K Ong; R Lakshman Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2015-08-07 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Kaitlyn M Eck; Aleksandr Dinesen; Elder Garcia; Colleen L Delaney; Oluremi A Famodu; Melissa D Olfert; Carol Byrd-Bredbenner; Karla P Shelnutt Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Jayneel Limbachia; Dipika Desai; Nora Abdalla; Russell J de Souza; Koon Teo; Katherine M Morrison; Zubin Punthakee; Milan Gupta; Scott A Lear; Sonia S Anand Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2022-09-29
Authors: Jamie M Zoellner; Brittany M Kirkpatrick; Dylan A Allanson; Kayla M Mariner; Diana Cuy-Castellanos; M Elizabeth Miller; Zachary Foster; Tara Martin Journal: Matern Child Health J Date: 2022-09-20
Authors: C Miller; K Wright; J Dono; S Pettigrew; M Wakefield; J Coveney; G Wittert; D Roder; S Durkin; J Martin; K Ettridge Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-06-22 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Ana Laura de la Garza; Bianca Romero-Delgado; Alejandra Mayela Martínez-Tamez; Marcela Cárdenas-Tueme; Bianka Dianey Camacho-Zamora; Daniel Matta-Yee-Chig; Mónica Sánchez-Tapia; Nimbe Torres; Alberto Camacho-Morales Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-01-07 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Jennifer A Woo Baidal; Kelsey Nichols; Nalini Charles; Lauren Chernick; Ngoc Duong; Morgan A Finkel; Jennifer Falbe; Linda Valeri Journal: Nutrients Date: 2021-12-05 Impact factor: 5.717