BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcome measures are an important metric in evaluating treatment efficacy of reconstructive surgery. Toe-to-hand transfer can restore vital prehensile function; however, this surgery is complex, extensive rehabilitation is required, and there are concerns about donor-site morbidity. This study longitudinally explores the benefits of this procedure, from the patient's perspective, using patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent free toe-to-hand transfers from 2012 to 2015 were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the following validated questionnaires: the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Lower Limb Outcomes Questionnaire. Subgroup analysis was performed between dominant and nondominant reconstructed hands. RESULTS: Mechanism of injury was crush in 83 percent; the remainder sustained cutting, avulsion, and burn injuries. Thirty-four toes were transferred: nine great toes, 20 second toes, and five third toes. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire results showed significant improvement in overall activities of daily living, work, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). The results of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey showed significant improvements in physical and emotional roles (p < 0.05). The Lower Limb Outcomes Questionnaire showed no deterioration of foot function (p = 0.55). Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients undergoing dominant hand reconstruction but no difference between thumb reconstruction and finger-only reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate the significant utility of toe-to-hand transfer procedures in both functional and psychosocial domains in that there are relatively greater benefits in reconstructing the dominant hand, and that donor-site morbidity is well tolerated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.
BACKGROUND:Patient-reported outcome measures are an important metric in evaluating treatment efficacy of reconstructive surgery. Toe-to-hand transfer can restore vital prehensile function; however, this surgery is complex, extensive rehabilitation is required, and there are concerns about donor-site morbidity. This study longitudinally explores the benefits of this procedure, from the patient's perspective, using patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: Twenty-three patients who underwent free toe-to-hand transfers from 2012 to 2015 were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively using the following validated questionnaires: the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, and the Lower Limb Outcomes Questionnaire. Subgroup analysis was performed between dominant and nondominant reconstructed hands. RESULTS: Mechanism of injury was crush in 83 percent; the remainder sustained cutting, avulsion, and burn injuries. Thirty-four toes were transferred: nine great toes, 20 second toes, and five third toes. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire results showed significant improvement in overall activities of daily living, work, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction (p < 0.05). The results of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey showed significant improvements in physical and emotional roles (p < 0.05). The Lower Limb Outcomes Questionnaire showed no deterioration of foot function (p = 0.55). Subgroup analysis showed significant improvement in patient-reported outcome measures for patients undergoing dominant hand reconstruction but no difference between thumb reconstruction and finger-only reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS:Patient-reported outcome measures demonstrate the significant utility of toe-to-hand transfer procedures in both functional and psychosocial domains in that there are relatively greater benefits in reconstructing the dominant hand, and that donor-site morbidity is well tolerated. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.