Dan Annie Zhu1,2, Lena Mary Houlihan1, Helen M Mohan3, Morgan McCourt1, Emmet Andrews1,2. 1. Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland. 2. School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland. 3. Department of Surgery, Cork University Hospital, Wilton Road, Cork, Ireland. helen.mohan@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Management of anorectal abscess is traditionally by incision and drainage with packing. This study assessed the use of mushroom catheters compared with packing of anorectal abscess after incision and drainage in adults. Placement of a mushroom catheter to allow ongoing drainage of the cavity may have advantages by eliminating the need for painful dressing changes. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Following ethical approval, a chart review of 167 patients treated for anorectal abscess with either packing or mushroom catheter at Cork University Hospital from 2010 to 2015 was performed. Treatment decision was based on individual surgeon preference. Outcome measures included recurrence and fistula development. Telephone follow-up was also performed to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients were treated with incision and drainage with packing, and 38 patients were treated with mushroom catheter. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence (p = 0.691) or fistula development (p = 0.299) between the groups. Twenty-three patients had Crohn's disease, 17 patients had diabetes and 66 patients were smokers. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence or fistula development between the treatment groups in Crohn's (p = 0.493), diabetics (p = 0.949) and smokers (p = 0.275). On average, patients treated with mushroom catheter reported a statistically significant higher satisfaction score (9.2 ± 1.0) than patients treated with packing (7.6 ± 1.8, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: Mushroom catheter drainage of anorectal abscesses is a safe alternative to traditional packing and results in higher patient satisfaction. This study provides a rationale for a future randomised controlled trial.
PURPOSE: Management of anorectal abscess is traditionally by incision and drainage with packing. This study assessed the use of mushroom catheters compared with packing of anorectal abscess after incision and drainage in adults. Placement of a mushroom catheter to allow ongoing drainage of the cavity may have advantages by eliminating the need for painful dressing changes. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study. Following ethical approval, a chart review of 167 patients treated for anorectal abscess with either packing or mushroom catheter at Cork University Hospital from 2010 to 2015 was performed. Treatment decision was based on individual surgeon preference. Outcome measures included recurrence and fistula development. Telephone follow-up was also performed to assess patient satisfaction and quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine patients were treated with incision and drainage with packing, and 38 patients were treated with mushroom catheter. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence (p = 0.691) or fistula development (p = 0.299) between the groups. Twenty-three patients had Crohn's disease, 17 patients had diabetes and 66 patients were smokers. There was no statistically significant difference in recurrence or fistula development between the treatment groups in Crohn's (p = 0.493), diabetics (p = 0.949) and smokers (p = 0.275). On average, patients treated with mushroom catheter reported a statistically significant higher satisfaction score (9.2 ± 1.0) than patients treated with packing (7.6 ± 1.8, p = 0.013). CONCLUSION:Mushroom catheter drainage of anorectal abscesses is a safe alternative to traditional packing and results in higher patient satisfaction. This study provides a rationale for a future randomised controlled trial.
Authors: Darren M Tonkin; Elizabeth Murphy; Mark Brooke-Smith; Paul Hollington; Nicholas Rieger; Simon Hockley; Nigel Richardson; David A Wattchow Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Stella R Smith; Katy Newton; Jennifer A Smith; Jo C Dumville; Zipporah Iheozor-Ejiofor; Lyndsay E Pearce; Paul J Barrow; Laura Hancock; James Hill Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2016-08-26